Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBenghazi committee springs a curious (UNTRUE) leak
Posted with permission.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/benghazi-committee-springs-curious-leak?cid=sm_fb_maddow
Benghazi committee springs a curious leak
07/06/15 11:20 AM
By Steve Benen
Three weeks ago, Politico published a fairly long, front-page piece with a provocative headline: Benghazi panel probes Sidney Blumenthals work for David Brock. At issue, of course, is the House Select Committee on Benghazi, already responsible for one of the longest congressional investigations in congressional history, and its meandering focus.
But the Politico article went further than most, highlighting some news that hadnt been reported elsewhere.
While still secretary of state, Clinton emailed back and forth with Blumenthal about efforts by one of the groups, Media Matters, to neutralize criticism of her handling of the deadly assault on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, sources tell POLITICO.
Got all this done. Complete refutation on Libya smear, Blumenthal wrote to Clinton in an Oct. 10, 2012, email into which he had pasted links to four Media Matters posts criticizing Fox News and Republicans for politicizing the Benghazi attacks and challenging claims of lax security around the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, according to a source who has reviewed the email exchange. Blumenthal signed off the email to Clinton by suggesting that one of her top aides, Philippe Reines, can circulate these links, according to the source. Clinton responded: Thanks, Im pushing to WH, according to the source.
The emails were not included in documents originally turned over by the State Department.
Got all this done. Complete refutation on Libya smear, Blumenthal wrote to Clinton in an Oct. 10, 2012, email into which he had pasted links to four Media Matters posts criticizing Fox News and Republicans for politicizing the Benghazi attacks and challenging claims of lax security around the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, according to a source who has reviewed the email exchange. Blumenthal signed off the email to Clinton by suggesting that one of her top aides, Philippe Reines, can circulate these links, according to the source. Clinton responded: Thanks, Im pushing to WH, according to the source.
The emails were not included in documents originally turned over by the State Department.
For the Republican Partys many Benghazi enthusiasts, the report painted a nefarious picture, based on information the State Department had kept under wraps. Indeed, the fact that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded, Thanks, Im pushing to WH, raised the prospect of Clinton urging the White House to shape its talking points based on Media Matters reports a revelation that might help explain the GOP-led panels interest in David Brock.
There was, however, a problem: the Politico report wasnt entirely accurate or more to the point, the Politico report was based in part on information leaked to the news outlet that turned out to be untrue.
This morning, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the ranking member on the committee, sent a letter to the panels chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), making the case that it it now appears that someone who was given access to the Select Committees documents leaked doctored information to the press in order to make unsubstantiated allegations against Secretary Clinton.
By all appearances, Cummings has a very good point. From his letter:
* First, the source claimed that Secretary Clinton wrote Thanks, Im pushing to WH in response to an email from Mr. Blumenthal on October 10. In fact, she did not make that statement in response to this email. Secretary Clinton was responding to a completely different email more than a week earlier, on October 1.
* Second, the source claimed that Secretary Clinton was responding to a suggestion from Mr. Blumenthal that Philippe Reines circulate links to four Media Matters articles that refuted the way the right-wing media was covering Republican statements about the Benghazi attacks. In fact, Secretary Clinton was responding to an email from Mr. Blumenthal forwarding an article from Salon.com reporting that Republicans were planning to claim inaccurately during the presidential debates that the White House had advance knowledge about the Benghazi attacks and failed to act on it. The article included no reference to Mr. Reines at all.
* Third, the source claimed that Secretary Clintons email saying Thanks, Im pushing to WH was not turned over by the State Department. In fact, that email was turned over to the Select Committee by the State Department on February 13, 2015, marked with Bates number STATE-SCB0045548-SCB0045550. The Select Committee has had that email for four months.
* Second, the source claimed that Secretary Clinton was responding to a suggestion from Mr. Blumenthal that Philippe Reines circulate links to four Media Matters articles that refuted the way the right-wing media was covering Republican statements about the Benghazi attacks. In fact, Secretary Clinton was responding to an email from Mr. Blumenthal forwarding an article from Salon.com reporting that Republicans were planning to claim inaccurately during the presidential debates that the White House had advance knowledge about the Benghazi attacks and failed to act on it. The article included no reference to Mr. Reines at all.
* Third, the source claimed that Secretary Clintons email saying Thanks, Im pushing to WH was not turned over by the State Department. In fact, that email was turned over to the Select Committee by the State Department on February 13, 2015, marked with Bates number STATE-SCB0045548-SCB0045550. The Select Committee has had that email for four months.
Politicos online edition ultimately ran a correction and deleted the sentence about Clintons Im pushing to WH email altogether.
But Politico obviously didnt make this up; it relied on a source that provided misleading information, apparently with a specific partisan agenda in mind.
To be sure, weve grown accustomed to some deceptive leaks from congressional Republicans, especially in the area of Benghazi conspiracy theories, but Gowdy has vowed to run a tight ship. In fact, the South Carolina Republican has specifically boasted, {S}erious investigations do not leak information or make selective releases of information without full and proper context.
So, whats the explanation here? And if this leak was bogus, what else has Gowdys Republican-run panel leaked to the press that also wasnt true?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 730 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Benghazi committee springs a curious (UNTRUE) leak (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jul 2015
OP
randys1
(16,286 posts)1. The America hating American Taliban terrorist org, of which Gowdy is a major player
wants to destroy America, burn it to the ground.
And Rebuild it white and ugly.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)2. K & R
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)3. It sounds like Gowdy doody time.