Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 05:52 PM Jul 2015

2005 deposition: Bill Cosby admits buying Quaaludes to give women he wanted to have sex with.

And admitted to giving them to at least one woman. In other words, he admitted to rape.

The higher they fall . . . .

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3151522/Cosby-said-got-drugs-women-sex.html

Bill Cosby admitted in a 2005 deposition that he obtained Quaaludes with the intent of giving them to young women he wanted to have sex with. He admitted giving the sedative to at least one woman.

The Associated Press went to court to compel the release of the documents, and they were made public Monday.

Cosby's lawyers had objected on the grounds that it would embarrass their client.

The 77-year-old comedian was testifying under oath in a lawsuit filed by a former Temple University employee. He testified he gave her three half-pills of Benadryl.

The lawsuit accused Cosby of drugging and sexually assaulting the woman at Cosby's home. Cosby's lawyer argued that his client's deposition could reveal details of Cosby's marriage, sex life and prescription drug use.


SNIP

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bill-cosby-deposition-reveals-he-806963

A decade ago, Bill Cosby admitted under oath that he gave women drugs for the purpose of sex.

In a deposition on September 29, 2005, the comedian was asked, "When you got the Quaaludes, was it in your mind that you were going to use these Quaaludes for young women that you wanted to have sex with?"

"Yes," responded Cosby.

The document obtained by The Hollywood Reporter was revealed after a Pennsylvania judge agreed to unseal old court filings in a settled case brought by Andrea Constand, who was the first woman to publicly come forward with allegations that he drugged and sexually assaulted her. The settlement happened in the midst of discovery as Cosby confronted charges that there were other women who were victims.

72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2005 deposition: Bill Cosby admits buying Quaaludes to give women he wanted to have sex with. (Original Post) pnwmom Jul 2015 OP
The man had a great life and shit all over it. nt SunSeeker Jul 2015 #1
And, obviously, he shat on and ruined many other lives. RadiationTherapy Jul 2015 #2
But it is about him and his actions. He is responsible for ruining all those lives. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #4
Yeah, but my first thought is not for his life. RadiationTherapy Jul 2015 #5
I agree. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #7
apparently he has been a rapist all during his career, ugh Liberal_in_LA Jul 2015 #24
If a rich respected celebrity needed to use drugs to get laid, something was very wrong JPZenger Jul 2015 #3
Don't confuse rape with "getting laid". He preferred to rape and figured out a bettyellen Jul 2015 #6
Thank you for this excellent post. yardwork Jul 2015 #12
It makes me nuts when people don't get it. bettyellen Jul 2015 #15
Thank you. nt. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #40
I think comparing the two is an awful mistake that leads people to think its not so awful. bettyellen Jul 2015 #43
He didn't need to. He preferred his women unconscious, which IS very wrong. n/t pnwmom Jul 2015 #9
OK, for those very few people who still doubt the truth of the accusations against Cosby, Nye Bevan Jul 2015 #8
Oddly silent, now, aren't they? n/t freeplessinseattle Jul 2015 #10
Were there folks on DU who doubted? I thought it was mostly RW'ers on RW sites? stevenleser Jul 2015 #11
Nope. There were doubters who assumed somehow this was a conspiracy of gold diggers.... bettyellen Jul 2015 #14
Yep. Some claiming the victims were racists, others geek tragedy Jul 2015 #17
See this thread for the rape apologists/denialists geek tragedy Jul 2015 #18
Almost impossible to believe what I was reading. stevenleser Jul 2015 #22
That was frustrating to read. "They have a legacy to destroy..." LanternWaste Jul 2015 #29
and at least one of the trolls was a woman shanti Jul 2015 #30
And *crickets* Starry Messenger Jul 2015 #31
well, one of them was a zombie troll and another was banned for calling geek tragedy Jul 2015 #32
Yes, there are a few who are still here though. Starry Messenger Jul 2015 #35
Well, at least one of the folks is insisting to me that he is "innocent until proven guilty" stevenleser Jul 2015 #38
That one is all kinds of ironic. Starry Messenger Jul 2015 #41
Good point, I'll have to mention that... nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #42
Yours is a very sophisticated smear, Starry Messenger. Octafish Jul 2015 #55
Besides in your mind, where was Cosby convicted, stevenleser? Octafish Jul 2015 #48
Ask the women in this thread that Octafish, if you dare. nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #49
I asked you. Octafish Jul 2015 #50
Ask the women who are at risk for being raped what they think of your position. nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #51
You don't know the difference, do you? Octafish Jul 2015 #53
Here is your chance to argue with people about it. I created a poll to see if folks think what you stevenleser Jul 2015 #54
Cowardly way out, stevenleser, having to hide behind another's writing. Octafish Jul 2015 #56
If you are not a coward, face the women who are affected by what you are saying. Simple. nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #57
I'm asking you. Octafish Jul 2015 #58
I've answered your question 50 different ways. Now face the women you are insulting. nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #59
Where? Do you think a journalist should call a person a rapist without a conviction in court? Octafish Jul 2015 #60
You are the one who brought up cowardice upthread. Face the women whose concerns you are dismissing stevenleser Jul 2015 #61
Wrong, as anyone who can read will see. So, where did you write your answer? Octafish Jul 2015 #62
You would think. kcr Jul 2015 #13
there were still people who doubted? restorefreedom Jul 2015 #16
It's good to know what the formula is. Brickbat Jul 2015 #19
Sadly, I doubt he was the only one during that time. cwydro Jul 2015 #20
In those days? yardwork Jul 2015 #26
Feel free to disagree. nt cwydro Jul 2015 #27
Money and fame won't get him out of his own testimony. herding cats Jul 2015 #21
Went to freeperville to see what they had to say about Cosby AndreaCG Jul 2015 #23
He's not a nice cuddly doctor or a hero/sidekick; he just played them on TV. Hekate Jul 2015 #25
And every single word on this subject was/is a lie.. Stuart G Jul 2015 #28
I'm sure most rapists are embarrassed when they're caught. Blue_In_AK Jul 2015 #33
His wife's silence realFedUp Jul 2015 #34
Not any better than when Maria Shriver Schwartahoozits Le Taz Hot Jul 2015 #69
The victims realFedUp Jul 2015 #36
The thing I really don't understand is simply: why? Vinca Jul 2015 #37
It's not sex. stop equating it with sex for fucks sake!!! bettyellen Jul 2015 #44
Well, it's not checkers. Vinca Jul 2015 #45
Because the way we talk about rape is important. JTFrog Jul 2015 #63
Rape is not sex. If you truly understood that, you'd be able to answer the question yourself. bettyellen Jul 2015 #64
It's sad you're so nasty to someone who is definitely not sympathetic to Cosby. Vinca Jul 2015 #65
I'm just straight up correcting the sick and dangerous idea that rape=sex. bettyellen Jul 2015 #66
My question was about Cosby's motives. Vinca Jul 2015 #67
You asked why rape when he could easily have sex- as if they were the same thing. bettyellen Jul 2015 #70
Well that's amusing. I was alerted. Vinca Jul 2015 #72
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Reter Jul 2015 #71
Because it is about power and control. Having lots of people want to have sex with you... PoliticAverse Jul 2015 #52
I heard a good solution to the Cosby situation: bankrupt him. Initech Jul 2015 #39
with records unsealed, that may become possible HFRN Jul 2015 #47
when you benefit from legal silence, or people just forgetting HFRN Jul 2015 #46
After the 4th or 5th accusation Le Taz Hot Jul 2015 #68

SunSeeker

(51,574 posts)
4. But it is about him and his actions. He is responsible for ruining all those lives.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 06:08 PM
Jul 2015

He is the one who for years has tried to make it not about him but about the women being crazy and making it up.

RadiationTherapy

(5,818 posts)
5. Yeah, but my first thought is not for his life.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 06:13 PM
Jul 2015

Fuck his life. What he did to these women is far more relevant.

SunSeeker

(51,574 posts)
7. I agree.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 06:20 PM
Jul 2015

My point was he is not the victim here, despite his lawyer's remarks about how "embarrassing" this deposition release is for him. He did this to himself. He had a great life and ruined it, by ruining the lives of dozens of women.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
6. Don't confuse rape with "getting laid". He preferred to rape and figured out a
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 06:17 PM
Jul 2015

Method. He could have easily found consenting women- some of these women had consented on prior occasions. He didn't want their consent.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
43. I think comparing the two is an awful mistake that leads people to think its not so awful.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 06:27 PM
Jul 2015

Almost like punishing the guy is worse than the act itself. It's not sex! Fuck calling it sex!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
8. OK, for those very few people who still doubt the truth of the accusations against Cosby,
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 06:21 PM
Jul 2015

this should finally and definitively remove all of that doubt.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
14. Nope. There were doubters who assumed somehow this was a conspiracy of gold diggers....
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 08:36 PM
Jul 2015

But that's the first thing those MRA types think.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
29. That was frustrating to read. "They have a legacy to destroy..."
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 09:09 AM
Jul 2015

That was frustrating to read. "They have a legacy to destroy..."

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
32. well, one of them was a zombie troll and another was banned for calling
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:26 PM
Jul 2015

Hillary the C-word.

So, fortunately, we are spared their wisdom

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
35. Yes, there are a few who are still here though.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:30 PM
Jul 2015

Jill Scott admitted she was wrong, it would be nice to seem the same integrity displayed on DU by Cosby's erstwhile defenders here who still are posting.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
41. That one is all kinds of ironic.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:39 PM
Jul 2015

I thought he was against the wealthy using their money and prestige to avoid justice. The "BFEE" has never been convicted of anything either...

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
55. Yours is a very sophisticated smear, Starry Messenger.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:14 AM
Jul 2015
I thought he was against the wealthy using their money and prestige to avoid justice. The "BFEE" has never been convicted of anything either...


By your reasoning, I'm disqualified to write about Cosby or the BFEE.

What do you have to say about what I actually have written? Please show where I've intentionally lied or presented information that was not true on DU. Go through my Journal on DU3 or DU2.

If I'm mistaken anywhere, I'll apologize. So, show, otherwise all you are doing is smearing me.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
48. Besides in your mind, where was Cosby convicted, stevenleser?
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 08:28 AM
Jul 2015

As far as I know, not in a court of law.



While it may work for Roger Ailes, calling someone a rapist based on what you read in the papers or saw on tee vee doesn't pass for journalism, either.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
50. I asked you.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 08:57 AM
Jul 2015

Do you think a court transcript, quoted in a newspaper, is good enough to state someone is a rapist?



Octafish

(55,745 posts)
53. You don't know the difference, do you?
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:08 AM
Jul 2015

Understanding the point about being convicted in a court of law is an important distinction for a journalist.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
54. Here is your chance to argue with people about it. I created a poll to see if folks think what you
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:09 AM
Jul 2015

and others are saying is acceptable: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026951237

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
56. Cowardly way out, stevenleser, having to hide behind another's writing.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:18 AM
Jul 2015

Do you think it's proper for a journalist to call a person a rapist who has not been convicted of rape?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
58. I'm asking you.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:21 AM
Jul 2015

Do you think journalists should call people "rapists" who have not been convicted of rape?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
60. Where? Do you think a journalist should call a person a rapist without a conviction in court?
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:30 AM
Jul 2015

Where did you answer the question? I don't see your answer.

Stating something is so when it is not true is called what?

Do you think journalists should report things that are not true, stevenleser?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
61. You are the one who brought up cowardice upthread. Face the women whose concerns you are dismissing
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:48 AM
Jul 2015

if you think you are so brave compared to me.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
62. Wrong, as anyone who can read will see. So, where did you write your answer?
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:56 AM
Jul 2015

Should a journalist call a person a rapist without a conviction in court?

Your evasion makes it easy for me to call you a lot of things. Journalist isn't one of them.

kcr

(15,317 posts)
13. You would think.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 07:43 PM
Jul 2015

I thought of all the people who doubted those women, even after so many came forward.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
20. Sadly, I doubt he was the only one during that time.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 09:55 PM
Jul 2015

Women were just objects in those days.

I bet he learned the Quaalude thing from his show-biz friends.

herding cats

(19,565 posts)
21. Money and fame won't get him out of his own testimony.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 09:56 PM
Jul 2015

He's a rapist, by his own admission.

The poor man, he was worried about "real, specific threat of serious embarrassment" if his words were made public. I wonder where his worry was for the women he was drugging and raping? I mean beyond their making a fuss and embarrassing him, of course.

AndreaCG

(2,331 posts)
23. Went to freeperville to see what they had to say about Cosby
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 11:44 PM
Jul 2015

Other than one person who said many people use alcohol to get people to have sex with them, they were not on Bill's side. Not a really big thread though so don't know if it's representative of past ones.

Hekate

(90,714 posts)
25. He's not a nice cuddly doctor or a hero/sidekick; he just played them on TV.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 01:18 AM
Jul 2015

What he is is a serial rapist, and all the rest was fake.

I'm so sorry for his victims.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
33. I'm sure most rapists are embarrassed when they're caught.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:27 PM
Jul 2015

Why should Cosby be spared "embarrassment"?

realFedUp

(25,053 posts)
34. His wife's silence
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:28 PM
Jul 2015

I wonder what their life together is like? Silences, pretending, acting like everything is great? I feel like she is complicit.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
69. Not any better than when Maria Shriver Schwartahoozits
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:48 PM
Jul 2015

did. Got up and defended her lying, cheating, scumbag of a husband claiming all those women who told how her Arnie sexually harassed them were liars. And Oprah gave them a whole hour on her show during the recall election but didn't do the same for Gray. It's when I started seeing Oprah for what she really is.

realFedUp

(25,053 posts)
36. The victims
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:32 PM
Jul 2015

There is little in depth coverage of how any action against them affected the rest of their lives.

Vinca

(50,278 posts)
37. The thing I really don't understand is simply: why?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:35 PM
Jul 2015

He was a celebrity and usually celebrities have to fend off admirers who are more than willing to have sex with them. Why did he become a serial rapist? Very strange.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
63. Because the way we talk about rape is important.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 10:15 AM
Jul 2015

Rape is a crime.

Rape is not sex.

Sex requires consent.

You don't have rape with someone.


 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
64. Rape is not sex. If you truly understood that, you'd be able to answer the question yourself.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 10:21 AM
Jul 2015

Sad that you can't figure it out.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
66. I'm just straight up correcting the sick and dangerous idea that rape=sex.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 01:50 PM
Jul 2015

That idea is a million times nastier than my responses. It's minimizing rape and you don't seem to even realize it. Jokes about checkers? What the fuck?

Vinca

(50,278 posts)
67. My question was about Cosby's motives.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:40 PM
Jul 2015

I think you must be a closet Republican . . . you're downright mean.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
70. You asked why rape when he could easily have sex- as if they were the same thing.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:50 PM
Jul 2015

It hasn't dawned on you yet how wrong- and hateful to rape victims- that sounds?
Seriously?

Vinca

(50,278 posts)
72. Well that's amusing. I was alerted.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 07:35 AM
Jul 2015

I pondered whether to alert you and then decided people should see what causes people to leave DU.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
71. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:59 PM
Jul 2015

On Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:51 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

My question was about Cosby's motives.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6952658

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Directly insulting a DU member. Also seems to be saying that sex= rape, which is even worse.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:58 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I think it is against rules to call someone else a "Republican".
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: completely inappropriate personal attack; calling someone a republican is lower than low!
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The entire exchange has crossed the bounds of discussion into simple argument where both sides are listening to their own biases, not to the other's concerns.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The other person really was being very mean.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
52. Because it is about power and control. Having lots of people want to have sex with you...
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 09:01 AM
Jul 2015

isn't the same as being able to force any woman you want to have sex with you.

Initech

(100,081 posts)
39. I heard a good solution to the Cosby situation: bankrupt him.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:37 PM
Jul 2015

The guy has an estimated net worth of something like $400 million. That money should be divided among his 40+ victims that have come forward since the initial accusation. Then he should be blacklisted from performing stand up comedy again. That would be a fitting and just punishment for what Cosby did.

 

HFRN

(1,469 posts)
47. with records unsealed, that may become possible
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 08:21 AM
Jul 2015

as his own words and acts (taking a public hypocritical stance) caused those records to become unsealed (Cosby didn't keep his end of the implied bargain)

i wonder what the effect of unsealing records has on any statute of limitations, ie could the sealed period be added to the length of the statute of limitations?

 

HFRN

(1,469 posts)
46. when you benefit from legal silence, or people just forgetting
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 08:17 AM
Jul 2015

you put a sock in it, whenever anything close to that topic comes up, if you want to keep those skeletons in the closet

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
68. After the 4th or 5th accusation
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:43 PM
Jul 2015

at some point you have to conclude that not ALL of these women were out for money/out of notoriety/crazy/lying and whatever else they accused these women of being/doing.

And I remember PLENTY of DUers accusing the accusers of exactly those things I named and more.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2005 deposition: Bill Cos...