General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2005 deposition: Bill Cosby admits buying Quaaludes to give women he wanted to have sex with.
And admitted to giving them to at least one woman. In other words, he admitted to rape.
The higher they fall . . . .
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3151522/Cosby-said-got-drugs-women-sex.html
Bill Cosby admitted in a 2005 deposition that he obtained Quaaludes with the intent of giving them to young women he wanted to have sex with. He admitted giving the sedative to at least one woman.
The Associated Press went to court to compel the release of the documents, and they were made public Monday.
Cosby's lawyers had objected on the grounds that it would embarrass their client.
The 77-year-old comedian was testifying under oath in a lawsuit filed by a former Temple University employee. He testified he gave her three half-pills of Benadryl.
The lawsuit accused Cosby of drugging and sexually assaulting the woman at Cosby's home. Cosby's lawyer argued that his client's deposition could reveal details of Cosby's marriage, sex life and prescription drug use.
SNIP
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bill-cosby-deposition-reveals-he-806963
A decade ago, Bill Cosby admitted under oath that he gave women drugs for the purpose of sex.
In a deposition on September 29, 2005, the comedian was asked, "When you got the Quaaludes, was it in your mind that you were going to use these Quaaludes for young women that you wanted to have sex with?"
"Yes," responded Cosby.
The document obtained by The Hollywood Reporter was revealed after a Pennsylvania judge agreed to unseal old court filings in a settled case brought by Andrea Constand, who was the first woman to publicly come forward with allegations that he drugged and sexually assaulted her. The settlement happened in the midst of discovery as Cosby confronted charges that there were other women who were victims.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)I refuse to make this about him.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)He is the one who for years has tried to make it not about him but about the women being crazy and making it up.
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)Fuck his life. What he did to these women is far more relevant.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)My point was he is not the victim here, despite his lawyer's remarks about how "embarrassing" this deposition release is for him. He did this to himself. He had a great life and ruined it, by ruining the lives of dozens of women.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)JPZenger
(6,819 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Method. He could have easily found consenting women- some of these women had consented on prior occasions. He didn't want their consent.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)Rape is all about having power over another person.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Almost like punishing the guy is worse than the act itself. It's not sex! Fuck calling it sex!
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)this should finally and definitively remove all of that doubt.
freeplessinseattle
(3,508 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)But that's the first thing those MRA types think.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)said they were gold diggers.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)really showing their ass.
A couple of banned trolls, but some still here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026068546
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)That was frustrating to read. "They have a legacy to destroy..."
shanti
(21,675 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Hillary the C-word.
So, fortunately, we are spared their wisdom
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Jill Scott admitted she was wrong, it would be nice to seem the same integrity displayed on DU by Cosby's erstwhile defenders here who still are posting.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I thought he was against the wealthy using their money and prestige to avoid justice. The "BFEE" has never been convicted of anything either...
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)By your reasoning, I'm disqualified to write about Cosby or the BFEE.
What do you have to say about what I actually have written? Please show where I've intentionally lied or presented information that was not true on DU. Go through my Journal on DU3 or DU2.
If I'm mistaken anywhere, I'll apologize. So, show, otherwise all you are doing is smearing me.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)As far as I know, not in a court of law.
While it may work for Roger Ailes, calling someone a rapist based on what you read in the papers or saw on tee vee doesn't pass for journalism, either.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Do you think a court transcript, quoted in a newspaper, is good enough to state someone is a rapist?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Understanding the point about being convicted in a court of law is an important distinction for a journalist.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)and others are saying is acceptable: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026951237
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Do you think it's proper for a journalist to call a person a rapist who has not been convicted of rape?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Do you think journalists should call people "rapists" who have not been convicted of rape?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Where did you answer the question? I don't see your answer.
Stating something is so when it is not true is called what?
Do you think journalists should report things that are not true, stevenleser?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)if you think you are so brave compared to me.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Should a journalist call a person a rapist without a conviction in court?
Your evasion makes it easy for me to call you a lot of things. Journalist isn't one of them.
kcr
(15,317 posts)I thought of all the people who doubted those women, even after so many came forward.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)wow.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)The word of dozens of women, the word of one man.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Women were just objects in those days.
I bet he learned the Quaalude thing from his show-biz friends.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)herding cats
(19,565 posts)He's a rapist, by his own admission.
The poor man, he was worried about "real, specific threat of serious embarrassment" if his words were made public. I wonder where his worry was for the women he was drugging and raping? I mean beyond their making a fuss and embarrassing him, of course.
AndreaCG
(2,331 posts)Other than one person who said many people use alcohol to get people to have sex with them, they were not on Bill's side. Not a really big thread though so don't know if it's representative of past ones.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)What he is is a serial rapist, and all the rest was fake.
I'm so sorry for his victims.
Stuart G
(38,436 posts)I also feel very sorry for his victims..
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Why should Cosby be spared "embarrassment"?
realFedUp
(25,053 posts)I wonder what their life together is like? Silences, pretending, acting like everything is great? I feel like she is complicit.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)did. Got up and defended her lying, cheating, scumbag of a husband claiming all those women who told how her Arnie sexually harassed them were liars. And Oprah gave them a whole hour on her show during the recall election but didn't do the same for Gray. It's when I started seeing Oprah for what she really is.
realFedUp
(25,053 posts)There is little in depth coverage of how any action against them affected the rest of their lives.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)He was a celebrity and usually celebrities have to fend off admirers who are more than willing to have sex with them. Why did he become a serial rapist? Very strange.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Vinca
(50,278 posts)Instead of being snarky, why don't you offer an answer to my question?
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Rape is a crime.
Rape is not sex.
Sex requires consent.
You don't have rape with someone.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Sad that you can't figure it out.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)That idea is a million times nastier than my responses. It's minimizing rape and you don't seem to even realize it. Jokes about checkers? What the fuck?
Vinca
(50,278 posts)I think you must be a closet Republican . . . you're downright mean.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)It hasn't dawned on you yet how wrong- and hateful to rape victims- that sounds?
Seriously?
Vinca
(50,278 posts)I pondered whether to alert you and then decided people should see what causes people to leave DU.
Reter
(2,188 posts)On Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:51 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
My question was about Cosby's motives.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6952658
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Directly insulting a DU member. Also seems to be saying that sex= rape, which is even worse.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:58 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I think it is against rules to call someone else a "Republican".
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: completely inappropriate personal attack; calling someone a republican is lower than low!
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The entire exchange has crossed the bounds of discussion into simple argument where both sides are listening to their own biases, not to the other's concerns.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The other person really was being very mean.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)isn't the same as being able to force any woman you want to have sex with you.
Initech
(100,081 posts)The guy has an estimated net worth of something like $400 million. That money should be divided among his 40+ victims that have come forward since the initial accusation. Then he should be blacklisted from performing stand up comedy again. That would be a fitting and just punishment for what Cosby did.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)as his own words and acts (taking a public hypocritical stance) caused those records to become unsealed (Cosby didn't keep his end of the implied bargain)
i wonder what the effect of unsealing records has on any statute of limitations, ie could the sealed period be added to the length of the statute of limitations?
HFRN
(1,469 posts)you put a sock in it, whenever anything close to that topic comes up, if you want to keep those skeletons in the closet
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)at some point you have to conclude that not ALL of these women were out for money/out of notoriety/crazy/lying and whatever else they accused these women of being/doing.
And I remember PLENTY of DUers accusing the accusers of exactly those things I named and more.