Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 12:30 PM Jun 2015

Bush, Walker eye new ‘nuclear option’

By Steve Benen

In his weekly address over the weekend, President Obama made a straightforward vow, intended to set families’ minds at ease: the Affordable Care Act is “here to stay.” His confidence is understandable, since the King v. Burwell case was effectively the anti-healthcare forces’ last real shot to undermine the law and take benefits from millions.

But, skeptics might say, what about 2017? What about the not-at-all-fanciful possibility that, a year and a half from now, Americans will have elected a Republican president to work with a Republican Congress? It stands to reason that a GOP-dominated federal government might get to work dismantling the current American health care system.

Democrats believe the law is “here to stay,” however, because of the legislative process – Senate Dems would obviously filibuster any attempt to start taking benefits away from families. Unless GOP senators had 60 votes – an unlikely scenario – a Republican repeal plan would fail.

Unless, that is, Republicans change the rules. Bloomberg Politics reported late last week:

Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush said Friday he’s open to eliminating the Senate’s 60-vote threshold if it helps Congress repeal Obamacare and enact “free-market oriented” health care reforms.

-snip-

more
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/bush-walker-eye-new-nuclear-option?cid=eml_mra_20150629

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bush, Walker eye new ‘nuclear option’ (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2015 OP
I'm wondering that with Fast Track authority (TPA) if even that will be necessary or not... cascadiance Jun 2015 #1
Careful, big gray elephant HassleCat Jun 2015 #2
We had "free market oriented" health care before. Fawke Em Jun 2015 #3
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
1. I'm wondering that with Fast Track authority (TPA) if even that will be necessary or not...
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 12:32 PM
Jun 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026920569

if they can have Obamacare or some bill nullifying it classified as a "free trade" bill or something that is joined with other "free trade" legislation to have it go in with the same rules that TPP will have to allow it to pass in a few weeks.

There has to be a reason that almost all of the Republicans lined up with "socialist" Barack Obama to pass that mess! I really think that it is something like this, as evidenced by the article you've quoted here too.
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
2. Careful, big gray elephant
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 12:34 PM
Jun 2015

The "nucalurr" option looks good when you need to do something such as repealing the socialist Kenyan's attempt to make you change doctors. If the political pendulum swings back the other way, you will regret this mightily.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bush, Walker eye new ‘nuc...