Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:11 AM Jun 2015

Breaking News: Court rules that the death-row inmates have failed to establish their claim

Breaking News:

The opinion in Glossip v. Gross is here. The Court rules that the death-row inmates have failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits on their claim that the use of midazolam violates the Eighth Amendment.


5-4 with Sotomayor delivering dissent

http://www.scotusblog.com/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking News: Court rules that the death-row inmates have failed to establish their claim (Original Post) Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 OP
For someone like me who has no idea what you're talking about..what, exactly, are you talking about? randome Jun 2015 #1
Glossip v. Gross Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #2
See here also: Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #3
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
1. For someone like me who has no idea what you're talking about..what, exactly, are you talking about?
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:15 AM
Jun 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
2. Glossip v. Gross
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:18 AM
Jun 2015

Glossip v. Gross
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-7955 10th Cir. Apr 29, 2015
Tr.Aud. Jun 29, 2015 5-4 Alito OT 2014

Issue: (1) Whether it is constitutionally permissible for a state to carry out an execution using a three-drug protocol where (a) there is a well-established scientific consensus that the first drug has no pain relieving properties and cannot reliably produce deep, coma-like unconsciousness, and (b) it is undisputed that there is a substantial, constitutionally unacceptable risk of pain and suffering from the administration of the second and third drugs when a prisoner is conscious; (2) whether the plurality stay standard of Baze v. Rees applies when states are not using a protocol substantially similar to the one that this Court considered in Baze; and (3) whether a prisoner must establish the availability of an alternative drug formula even if the state’s lethal-injection protocol, as properly administered, will violate the Eighth Amendment.

See here also:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026919995

• Lethal injections. The death penalty also is never far from the high court's docket. After a steady diet of cases and emergency appeals on issues such as claimed intellectual disabilities and the actions of defense lawyers and prosecutors, the court now must rule on a relatively new method of execution.

Unlike stronger barbiturates that are in short supply, the drug has failed in some cases to block pain and suffering during the lethal injection process.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
3. See here also:
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 11:07 AM
Jun 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026919995

• Lethal injections. The death penalty also is never far from the high court's docket. After a steady diet of cases and emergency appeals on issues such as claimed intellectual disabilities and the actions of defense lawyers and prosecutors, the court now must rule on a relatively new method of execution.

Unlike stronger barbiturates that are in short supply, the drug has failed in some cases to block pain and suffering during the lethal injection process.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking News: Court rule...