Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 05:47 PM Jun 2015

Heard back from my Senator Dianne Feinstein today: "FU, constituent KeepItReal."

She wrote... Or rather she voted.

So much for my email asking that she not support Fast Track Trade Authority for the TPP trade agreement.

Here's a fun fact, the bill she voted to end debate on and proceed to a simple majority vote has a provision that PROHIBITS the US negotiator from including any requirements addressing Climate Change.

Even Arnold Schwarzenegger would've opposed that provision.

SMH

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Heard back from my Senator Dianne Feinstein today: "FU, constituent KeepItReal." (Original Post) KeepItReal Jun 2015 OP
Did the same thing to me on a number of issues - she ain't no Democrat FreakinDJ Jun 2015 #1
Kamala Harris can't fill Feinstein's seat fast enough KeepItReal Jun 2015 #2
Ross Perot was the only prominent politician pogglethrope Jun 2015 #3
 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
1. Did the same thing to me on a number of issues - she ain't no Democrat
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 05:58 PM
Jun 2015

That arrogant piece of work wrote and said she is basically not worried about getting re-elected so she doesn't care

Wish some one would just run against her

BTW: I remember her on the radio admitting she was the deciding vote of NAFTA - said "Some one had to do it"

 

pogglethrope

(60 posts)
3. Ross Perot was the only prominent politician
Tue Jun 23, 2015, 06:11 PM
Jun 2015

I remember who strongly opposing NAFTA in 1992. He was right about its consequences, particularly about the loss of American jobs.

No one knows for sure what's in TPA -- and it's not actually a trade deal itself. However, the fact that so many foreign governments are thrilled about it and are spending money to lobby for its passage tells me all I need to know about it: It will be a good deal for other countries and a bad deal for the United States -- at least a bad deal for Average Joe.

From Wikipedia:

The "giant sucking sound" was United States Presidential candidate Ross Perot's colorful phrase for what he believed would be the negative effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he opposed.

In the second 1992 Presidential Debate, Ross Perot argued:

We have got to stop sending jobs overseas. It's pretty simple: If you're paying $12, $13, $14 an hour for factory workers and you can move your factory South of the border, pay a dollar an hour for labor ... have no health care — that's the most expensive single element in making a car— have no environmental controls, no pollution controls and no retirement, and you don't care about anything but making money, there will be a giant sucking sound going south.

... when [Mexico's] jobs come up from a dollar an hour to six dollars an hour, and ours go down to six dollars an hour, and then it's leveled again. But in the meantime, you've wrecked the country with these kinds of deals.


Perot didn't get elected, of course, and he won no electoral votes. However, his 19,743,821 and 18.9% of the popular vote was more than any non-major-party candidate since George Wallace in 1968. Wallace got 46 electoral votes, 9,901,118 popular votes, and 13.5% of the popular vote. That wasn't enough to keep Nixon out of the White House (301 electoral votes).
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Heard back from my Senato...