General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am an adjunct professor who teaches five classes. I earn less than a pet-sitter
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/22/adjunct-professor-earn-less-than-pet-sitterThe reason I field such questions is that, as an adjunct professor, whether teaching undergraduate or law-school courses, I make much less than a pet-sitter earns. This year Im teaching five classes (15 credit hours, roughly comparable to the teaching loads of some tenure-track law or business school instructors). At $3,000 per course, Ill pull in $15,000 for the year. I work year-round, 20 to 30 hours weekly teaching, developing courses and drafting syllabi, offering academic advice, recommendation letters and course extensions for students who need them. As I write, in late June, my students are wrapping up their final week of the first summer term, and the second summer term will begin next week.
I receive no benefits, no office, no phone or stipend for the basic communication demands of teaching. I keep constant tabs on the media I use in my classes; if I exhaust my own 10GB monthly data plan early, I lose vital time for online discussions with my students. This, although the university requires my students to engage in discussions about legal issues and ethics six days a week, and I must guide as well as grade these discussions.
Three of my Philadelphia-area friends are adjuncts with doctorate degrees. One keeps moving to other states for temporary teaching posts. The others teach at multiple sites to keep afloat financially one at no less than seven colleges and universities.
And yet tuition keeps going through the roof.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)I taught a couple of classes a semester. The work you have to put in is so time consuming, every spare minute was preparing for classes and grading papers. The pay is peanuts. I stopped because I was paying more in gas to get there than I was making. At first I did not mind, because it gave me good resume stuff. But after a while it was not worth the effort.
Blus4u
(608 posts)appeared in Slate a couple years ago:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/education/2013/11/death_of_duquesne_adjunct_margaret_mary_vojtko_what_really_happened_to_her.html#section-1
Long article but at least worth scanning.
Peace
ProfessorGAC
(65,085 posts)That's why i quit too. I was making way more money playing in a band, and although we rehearsed quite a bit, it was still far less time consuming and we rehearsed only 2 miles from my house.
Your last sentence i could use a direct lift.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Perhaps yours will too sometime and you can get on permanent. Also try other universities. I have heard that many are doing away with the program. Good luck. With a PHD, you are employable in a wide variety of areas.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)All I have is a measly B.A., even if it is from Yale.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)And second on getting that job. My university only hires PHDs. I know the pay sucks but you should be proud of the job. I am happy for you....yes money sucks but it will help having it on your resume. Best of luck!!!!!
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Someone wrote that article in the first person. I am a $38,000-a-year cube rat.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I thought you said you weren't an author not you are not an author....I thought you were saying that you haven't published for you dissertation or tenure which is why you were adjunct.....forget all my replies. that is me right now.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)That, and of course cost, have been the issues over the years.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)You would need 30-36 semester hrs.
Idea, pick a Phd program that might think about getting in the future, then put together 30-36 hrs of that program making sure that the 30-36 hrs. could be used to gain your masters and you would have a good head start on the PHD. It's like getting two degrees for one.
Not easy. But that's life for most of us.
Another idea, how about teaching in a first rate high school? With a BA and MA you might pull down 60 to 89 k, especially after a few years in the system.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)First of its kind; and maybe the only one, since they have changed the name to the cognitive science track.
As for teaching, that would require way, WAY too much social interaction.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Before I started teaching (extremely shy and non-social), but I found out I like the interaction when I am in charge and I like the subject. It's non-structured social interaction I can't stand.
High school computer science teachers are in huge demand, at least in my area.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)I never heard of such a thing -- and I live in $iliValley!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I still remember the Logo programming language from 30 years ago... ah, those Commodore 64s...
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)though I was in my 30s at the time.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Most schools offer at least through second semester college, although there's no AP test past the first semester anymore. This is the Houston suburban area - Houston proper offers CS in only a few schools.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)aren't going to enjoy being an educator. Teaching is fundamentally interaction with students. Are you familiar with the dialogs of Plato? If not, read some of them and notice the interaction between Socrates and the students.
I'm sympathetic with your situation but, somehow I get the feeling that maybe your are quite putting enough energy into the process.
By the way, from a psychological standpoint, I don't think that high school teaching and University teaching are fundamentally different processes, just subject levels.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)It's called different things at different universities, but an analytics degree is in high demand with big data.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)And their brother is touting an MBA.
Finance degrees are more flexible.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)So it seems unlikely that many current professors have that option.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)My wife is a tenured Professor (thanks to her hard work and good luck). She adjuncted for 3 years after getting her PhD, before landing the tenure-track position. We were fortunate, since I had a good job that paid the bills. Otherwise, she may have had to get another job to cover basic living expenses (she would have been making about $15,000/yr in the Washington, DC area.... tough to live on), and she may not have ever been able to keep up her research and publishing which eventually got her the tenure-track job.
Fortunately, her new University does not use many adjuncts. Most non-tenure-track professors, are on annual contracts that pay a living wage (not GREAT pay, but livable, with benefits), and most are rehired on a year to year basis. When she arrived, there WAS a tendency to not replace tenured faculty, instead just trying to replace them with contract faculty, but a new President came in last year and halted that trend, though he hasn't reversed it yet. He saw that quality recruits were moving on to better jobs with a couple years, thwarting the schools ambitions to increase its reputation. Now they just have to pay the tenured faculty what they are worth.
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)to such an extent that it overcomes my aversion to using the words "abused" and "exploited" when referring to an air conditioned, first world workplace that includes paid sick and vacation. The pay is so low and every skill set of every employee is fished out and thoroughly exploited to the maximum. It is a sickening environment and a twisted caricature of the notion of an "institution of higher learning."
Skittles
(153,169 posts)how long has it been that way - when did this kind of abuse and exploitation start
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)so they especially hate tax-paid state employees in education. I would say it has been 10 years at least. Our budget was cut deeply five years ago and the library extended its hours which required stretching staff over many more hours with no compensation. Two years ago, they extended the library hours to 24/7 during the last 2.5 weeks of fall/spring semesters - no staffing or pay increases, etc.
The pattern of increased skills through self-investment leading to increased responsibility with no compensation has been the norm here for a decade at least. Get the most and pay the least is what passes for "success driven leadership" these days. The last few hires at the entry "specialist" level have had master's degrees for $36k jobs. This in a very expensive cost of living town. One of the highest in the nation.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Left coast liberal
(1,138 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)That colleges were using their loan funds to hire many more admins, and other college oriented perks, while teachers were being underpaid.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)tuition alone at her private school is over $40K. In the dark ages when I graduated, my tuition, plus room and board, was in the $4k's.
So I've been trying to figure out where all the money is going, since it's clearly not going to faculty salaries.
erronis
(15,306 posts)They bring in new presidents and top level staff to economize the staffing. These high-level staff will be paid in the 6-7 digit range and the rest of the campus staff will be shafted.
Spending on fancy buildings and athletic stadiums are how this new crop views education.
We just kicked out a sleazeball at the University of Vermont who didn't even like to talk to students.
All of these places of higher education are looking for alumni donors and Daddy Megabucks who wants his name on a stadium.
Parents: Let your children find their dreams in the real world before you send your retirement funds to these thieves.
olddots
(10,237 posts)philly_bob
(2,419 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)About twice as many people want to be professors as universities have room to employ as professors.
panader0
(25,816 posts)But Mom and Grandfather were professors. I just didn't want to work indoors.
My brother has a Masters in History and never taught.
paleotn
(17,931 posts).... in the professions, Nursing, Accounting, some Management disciplines, qualified faculty are hard to come by even after the great recession. Many colleges and universities would love to expand their BSN program, but can't find the nursing faculty to do so. Liberal arts may be a different story. Not my area.
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)full-time, tenure track jobs are now a pipe-dream in academia...
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)and it worked out to $2.11 per hour of work... less than I made working as a stock boy when I was 15.
Maybe I should go to prison, I hear they are paying $2 in some places.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Do you know of a way?
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)are missing full-time positions.
Universities take advantage of a loophole that only counts classroom hours for calculating salary and benefits.
That is an easy thing to fix.
9 hours=full-time... now pay accordingly.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Why would universities make that change if the labor oversupply makes people willing to work as adjuncts for peanuts just to be in the Academy?
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)philly_bob
(2,419 posts)You're right, Recursion, there are more applicants than jobs in academia. But that's a market consideration. The market does not/should not rule all.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)If your average PhD level section in medieval literature is 7 students, and a professor leads 30 sections over her career, when she retires she will have taught 210 students who are now qualified to be medieval lit professors, but her retirement only opens up one job. But all 210 want to be professors.
How do you get the market out of that scenario? How do you forbid a postdoc from undercutting his classmates on costs?
philly_bob
(2,419 posts)...and when skilled Humanities graduates were valued in other industries.
Generally, I don't think education should be market-driven. The job of universities should NOT be to match job-seekers with jobs. Instead, universities should train well-informed citizens and advance knowledge.
I know, I'm idealistic and obsolete -- and no longer in the job market.
Rex
(65,616 posts)and children. The GOPs greed is only matched by their evilness and stupidity. We read about it all the time.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)More people want to be professors than universities need to hire. Unionizing won't help that, unless the organizational process excludes a lot of current adjuncts.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I'm in a union.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)On the chance that their job might end up paying more like yours.
Academic labor just isn't as rare as it was 40 years ago.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I think it was the biggest organizing sector last year. Unionization for adjuncts is very successful, as far as gaining pay and benefits for adjuncts.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/07/26/adjunct-union-contracts-ensure-real-gains-including-better-pay
John Curtis, director of research at the American Association of University Professors, reviewed adjunct union gains as part of his analysis of the 2012 Coalition on the Academic Workforce report on part-time faculty working conditions. Median pay per course was 25 percent higher for adjuncts where part-time faculty had union representation ($3,100 on average, compared to $2,475) he said, but those concrete benefits dont stop at pay.
Adjuncts with union representation also were more likely to have access to certain health and retirement benefits and had greater access to institutional support. For example, 18 percent of adjuncts on unionized campuses said they were paid for course cancellations, compared to 10 percent of their non-union peers. Fifteen percent of unionized campus adjuncts had paid office hours, compared to 4 percent of other adjuncts, and 20 percent union adjuncts said they had some kind of job security something only 4 percent of their non-union counterparts reported enjoying.
Highly paid administrators are also no longer rare, but I see no one suggesting they should make a career change for the good of academia, since most of them are about as useful as tits on a boar-hog.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It is the ever shrinking school budget in favor of corporate greed. Done for decades now by the GOP. Anyone that pays attention to the news would know that.
Good for them, you have the real answer as to why they are getting fired and laid off - unions means collective negotiating.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)They don't hire more teachers than they want, they just want to pay their workforce as little as possible. Those expanding tuition dollars are going into the pockets of the higher-ups.
Over the last 35 years, top administrators pay increased at 3 times the rate of faculty.[1]
From 1978-79 to 2013-14, the average salary of CEOs at public institutions rose by 75 percent, the average increase for CEOs at private institutions was about 170 percent.[2]
http://seiufacultyforward.org/facts/
I'm an evil labor organizer for adjuncts, so I eat, sleep, and breathe this issue.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)... thank you for your service.
If you're not in academia I don't think it's possible to truly understand just how much adjuncts (and doctoral students) are used & abused by the system. Like all industries, if the goal is to maximize profits then you hire the cheapest and most desperate labor force you can and give them bupkis by way of benefits & compensation.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)PM me if you ever want to. No, people don't know. There's a deep seated illusion that higher ed is full of professors who have nice long talks with students in their beautiful offices while plinking over their next book.
No one wants to face the reality of what a grinding lack of dignity it has become.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)if you want too...
But denying reality and continuing to encourage students to "study what they love" and continue to blow hundreds of thousands of dollars on degrees for which there are no associated jobs, simply because the idea that universities are graduating too many post-secondary educators doesn't fit your political narrative, is awfully selfish.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)educators and an educated public...but blah blah blah.
it's just awfully selfish when it's a societal problem, and folks blame the victims. and oh yeah -- you're the victim here.
arikara
(5,562 posts)not just teachers, hence the race to the bottom for wages.
That is by design.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You've certainly got the whole make-allegations-lacking-any-objective-or-supporting-evidence thing down. No doubt though-- it's a good tool to validate one's own biases...
burfman
(264 posts)I remember way back in the 60's when you could attend most colleges without taking on life long debt. Doesn't seem too fair that the system today depends on extracting obscene amounts of money from the student and their family while saving money on your back. The whole college scene today is just as detached from reality as our health care system.....It seems like in a few years one will be working mostly to pay for education and health care......
Burfman......
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)at purdue. he said "he took a vow of poverty" and after many years of struggling changed professions.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)As long as that remains true, adjuncts will be underpaid.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)shareholders. That's why businesses always proclaim the need to treat employees like crap and pay them as little as possible. "We have to!" they whine.
Barring that fiduciary duty, there's no reason to continue to underpay your teachers while continuously jacking up tuition. No one is forcing not-for-profit universities to treat their adjuncts like crap. They could raise pay scales and cut costs somewhere else, instead of always emulating RW business owners.
d_r
(6,907 posts)Keep slashing university budgets. Yes there are too many highly paid administrators, but the budgets keep shrinking as well.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Administrators are, as you just pointed out, a prime target for such cuts.
d_r
(6,907 posts)They put in hiring freezes. So no new tenure track lines. So young PhD s can't find jobs and are saddled with debt. At the same time, those classes still need to be taught. So the young PhD takes on some adjunct classes, and ends up in a spiral. The root of it is the GOP state legislatures.
former9thward
(32,029 posts)State legislatures have nothing to do with them. It is also happening everywhere. GOP does not control every state.
Rex
(65,616 posts)To pretend there are too many professors is something Glenn Beck would say.
And it is a huge problem. It will destroy university education.
Rex
(65,616 posts)No doubt by mistake.
bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)classes taught in large lecture halls with grad students to fill in gaps, your contention that "too many people want to teach at the Uni level" will be true. It is truly sad that the reputation for quality of education lags so far behind that admins can continue to use these techniques to squeeze uni faculty to the brink while destroying the quality of their product.
so your contention that "too many people want to teach..." can also be restated as "too few jobs are being offered...."
randys1
(16,286 posts)They think teachers have the easiest job in the world, plus they simply dont want an educated public, makes them feel insecure.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)kairos12
(12,862 posts)The astro turf Teabaggers can't have an educated population. Garlic to Dracula.
randys1
(16,286 posts)fucking bigot assholes
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,669 posts)The success rate was about 80% last I heard.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)I mean who wants to go to a school dedicated to academics that has a losing football or basketball team. I say, if you want to really learn, go to a library and read. It's free.
d_r
(6,907 posts)10 courses per year, 4 each spring and fall plus two summer.
aikoaiko
(34,174 posts)Part-time jobs were never meant to be cobbled together as a full-time job.
Do it because you love it, you don't want to do anything else, you want library privileges, you like impressing 20 year olds, etc., but its rarely a path to the big leagues.
And there are increasingly fewer tenure-track spots opening up. Although no one is quite sure what will happen with the community colleges if Obama can deliver on free CC tuition. I'd keep a foot in the door there.
stopwastingmymoney
(2,042 posts)I'm someone who fooled around in high school and went back to CC when I was 24. I graduated cum laude with a bs from a state university.
I never could have done that without the CC system. Big advocate here.
I'm fortunate to live in a small city with an excellent Junior College. It's a wonderful resource for a community and expanding that system could only bring good things. Including more good teaching jobs of course!
daleanime
(17,796 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)sounds like exploitation to me. what do tenured profs make? $100,000?
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)Not at SUNY they don't.
Newly tenured profs in department X at the SUNY school I am most familiar with make about $48K.
6chars
(3,967 posts)even that tenured prof salary is about 1 yrs private tuition.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)... but it certainly isn't going to the average tenure-track or tenured faculty member, or grad assistant or post-doc, or library staffer. It isn't paying for decent equipment for those folks either, or habitable office space, or air conditioners that work.
New stadiums? You betcha. And insane amounts of landscaping -- gotta look good apparently.
At least at the state schools. I have no idea what they spend money on at private colleges. Though I think it's probably administrative salaries, e.g. RPI in Troy NY.
6chars
(3,967 posts)instead of neither. there has to be another model
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)This was years ago. There's a significant bump at tenure, so I don't think that's right. I turned the offer down, mainly because I got a better offer elsewhere. That said, most tenured professors (I'm one of them) don't make anywhere close to 100k a year; that drew a belly laugh from me as well.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)...in academia. The gods know we do in real life.
(Social Welfare & Social Work, you see. )
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)That's still pretty low relative to tenured faculty nationwide, I gotta think. It was striking to me because that's the exact number offered to me as a brand new assistant professor at a SUNY - and this wasn't one of the research centers (or Geneseo). And it was way low to me even then. I'm in the liberal arts, too, not law or even a STEM field. Do most of y'all have MSW's or PhD's?
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)...you gotta have that PhD. Adjuncts in my dept. get paid about $3800 per class (adjuncts in other depts. get paid considerably more I think). And of course there's a tenure-track hiring freeze on (Thank you New York State), so there's LOTS of adjuncts teaching lots of classes. I made more as a grad assistant than I can now teaching 3 classes a semester. It's crazy.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)ALONE now is 10 times what FULL ANNUAL COSTS were (room and board included) when I was in college.
All that money's not going to faculty salaries, obviously. So where is it going?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Makes me wish I was in school again. The dorms are elite and the cafeterias and student unions are state of the art. So that is one area.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)on the same day. Different emails, at least.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)The Wizard
(12,545 posts)I tried to get a job at the school as a janitor because they made more money. The administration said no dice, what will the students think. It was fun and rewarding in the realm of contributing to a greater good. As for keeping a roof over my head and food on my table, nah. Unemployment paid better.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)with the growing popularity of moocs and paid for-credit moocs that are very reasonably priced, many people will opt for alternative ways of getting an education.
premed, nursing, things like that, those people are probably screwed because they will always need a traditional degree. but for many others, the options are increasing.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)There will still be "boutique" places like Harvard, but I doubt most teaching will be done via physical human presence in 2035.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i did it the "old fashioned way," but then when i went, a state u was affordable. i also enjoy moocs.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Plenty of those who experience digital learning come to understand that they crave the human presence and interaction. There are plenty of subjects that do not lend themselves to digital learning.
Clearly change will occur. I have taught all three ways - face-to-face, digital only, and hybrid - for years now, and your prediction is questionable.
Township75
(3,535 posts)They voice outrage with the treatment of adjuncts, but take no action to help them, and in many cases treat them like they are an outsourced cleaning service. It enrages me!
boomer55
(592 posts)JCMach1
(27,559 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)However, the AMA protects doctors' salaries by keeping med school classes small. The equivalent body for Medieval literature does not.
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)that's a key difference...
My generation (Gen X) faced generational (at least I did) age discrimination when we finished Grad. School. The hiring that happened was new professors who were the same generation.
Go through most university faculty lists and see how many tenured Professors are from Gen X.
We got the short stick again as administrators pushed business models and business ideology and began hiring more adjuncts, spamming TA's. At the same time, they also began tightening the screws even tighter for people to earn tenure even IF you are lucky enough to land a full-time position.
Now it's long-term hangers-on... Check the average age of full-time tenured faculty, and lots of McAdjuncts.
I escaped this BS for 10 years by working overseas, earning tenure there and getting paid a decent wage and benefits. I came back 2 years ago to find stagnant salaries (they haven't really changed since the 1990's) and virtually no work in academia.
I am just thankful I also run a small business..., otherwise I would be just like the author of this article.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)free market. I'm being sarcastic, of course.
10 years ago I was doing fairly great as an adjunct. Now I'm in trouble. What did I do to make this happen? Nothing.
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)There's a strict limit set on the number of people who can get MDS, because the AMA doesn't want what's happening to Medieval Lit professors to happen to doctors.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)Because they only let 5 people a year into my doctoral program. And I am very much in the humanities, as you call them.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And how many students each program can take. There's no equivalent in the humanities.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Response to boomer55 (Reply #77)
Hissyspit This message was self-deleted by its author.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)sellitman
(11,607 posts)You are our future.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)Bit of a shame some of the very best Prof's I had were adjuncts. Most of them held full time positions in private industry and taught 1 or 2 classes in the evening. Found them to be very good. But if you try to compete against them for a job. These Prof's already have a full set of benefits from their day job.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)hit on why:
pogglethrope
(60 posts)My grandson worked there two months last summer. He earned ~$38,000 plus housing.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)online colleges are on the upswing. can also search online high school diploma- plenty of places let teens take tests free, over & over and pay couple hundred when they pass.
Some online college free classes too but not many for credit, yet.. perhaps if all the new online free college business owners get Federal subsidies .
online college credit courses
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=online+college+credit+courses
PatrickforO
(14,582 posts)all that money is going. I'm sure the college presidents are getting some good bonuses.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Michigan college with some 30-odd years of teaching under her belt. While at her university she won every teaching award the school had to offer. We both retired in 2008 and moved to Florida for the weather.
It occurred to her that she might like to teach a course or two, just to keep her hand in, so she talked with the University of South Florida here in Tampa who readily hired her as an adjunct. She wound up teaching 2 three-credit courses, i.e. five classes a week for each group. Of course as an adjunct no benefits of any kind were provided, no office, or other support. In addition, USF also required that she pay for her parking - some $200 a semester.
Our home is about a 45 minute drive from USF. Once we saw her paycheck after deductions and taking into account the cost of gasoline for the daily commute and the costs of her parking, her net pay worked out to be about $3.50 an hour!
Needless to say, she didn't continue as an adjunct professor. The slave wages they pay these very qualified and extremely hard-working people are criminal.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)If adjunct professors want to stand up for themselves, they will have to stand up for others, first. We have a race to the bottom society where workers are treated worse than at any time in modern history.
In order to improve conditions for adjunct professors, we will have to stop all of that. We can't have an economy made up of poor, desperate people, on one hand, and well remunerated adjunct professors, on the other.
TL;DR: we are all hanging separately.