General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill Bernie Sanders cause Hillary Clinton to go "too far left" ?
I heard some talking head, on the talk shows this morning, harken back to the race of Bush, Sr when he was challenged by Patrick Buchanan. He/She said that Buchanan was getting about 30% in the race but it weakened Bush by making him go too far right, paraphrasing.
Hillary has come out with some very strong comments on guns. Bernie has not. Hillary has also said she did not agree with the "fast track" for the President, I have also read. Do these moves to the left hurt Hillary in the general election? Is she going "too far left"?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)for the likes of the .01% greed-heads on Wall St.
But NOT for We the People.
GO BERNIE!!!!!!!!!!!
kath
(10,565 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)follow up I doubt it as follow up doesn't seem to be her stronger suit.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)those numbers...
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Like obama
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Except that there will not be an ounce of sincerity in her supposed move left, and if she's elected, a couple of years on everyone will be saying, Oh, dear, I just NEVER thought she wasn't a real liberal.
sgtbenobo
(327 posts)....you are a hound dog after my heart.
Carry-the-fuck-On!
still_one
(92,190 posts)Buchanan, who was far more extreme than bush senior. His son, bush jr. Was extreme right, and the repukes during seniors time were used set with him because the extreme right said bush senior lied when he said no taxes.
djean111
(14,255 posts)what a politician is actually going to do. And the difference between campaign rhetoric and what can actually be done.
(Hillary's comments on Fast Track don't actually mean squat at this point in time.)
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Kinda like the batterers syndrome.
merrily
(45,251 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)The talk about the TPP isn't really anti international banking, it doesn't threaten foreign manufacturers or importers.
Her statements about gun control is what republicans expect anyway. Even if she said nothing about guns, the right would think some democratic group is plotting more gun control.
It would be controversial if she said that HSD and the FBI should work with the NSA to capture and identify all digital communication between government employees and hate groups.
Grilled Charlie
(57 posts)Right now she leaning heavily to the left with her vague statements - talking about affordable college and a higher minimum wage. Were she to be elected, she'd lean heavily to the right of those same vague statements and we'll discover that "affordable college" means lower interest rates on student loans and that a higher minimum wage means 8.50 and hour. In other words, she'd go 'all Obama on us'
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Mean while fuck roads bridges harbors railways etc.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Yes, I, too, have nightmares that the Post Office might not get privatized after all or, worse, that our economy might get a huge boost from the most cost effective health plan in the nation.
Fucking left. Where is Joe McCarthy, now that we really need him?
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Thanks for the laugh.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Yes, it's a risk to be considered, but I think that the advantages of pushing Hillary further left (possibility of doing more good if she wins, although in practice the Republican-dominated congress will mean that it won't make much difference) outweigh the disadvantages (arguably a slightly lower chance of winning).
merrily
(45,251 posts)80% approval from Americans of all political persuasions on some issues.
If that were not the case, I very much doubt Hillary would be running on them.
The idea that such issues make a candidate unelectable seem to have been a DLC myth. Besides, the DLC made THE most intractable issues, the ones tied up religious beliefs, the cynosure of the differences betweeh Democrats and Republicans, while dropping and discrediting the popular ones in the name of greater electability. Go figure.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Mondale, Dukakis, Bill Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Obama.
Yes, single-issue polls sometimes produce results pleasing to the left-wing eye. But declared preference matters far less than revealed preference; of the last 8 presidential elections Democrats have won four and lost four, and I would argue that the two candidates who won were all probably more centrist than the four who lost.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)aspirant
(3,533 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)newfie11
(8,159 posts)Heck yeah!!!!
Go Bernie!!!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Well, maybe
I kid.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)campaign rhetoric as just that, and then for themselves
add to each of her newly found left proposals the words:
perhaps, if circumstances allow it, if it were possible, etc.
in addition to asking themselves whether they could take
these to the bank.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)SaranchaIsWaiting
(247 posts)And she can't change that.
Ron Green
(9,822 posts)Is that how she goes "left?" Enough of the Culture War! The biggest favor Bernie could do for Hillary would be to drive her not to the left, but to the truth.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)She is right on the gun issue, BTW most Americans agree with gun control bills. Actually many thinks she will go further to the right in the general.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)I think the country is so evenly split at this point that the answer to your question is I don't know. It could go either way, as far as I can tell.