Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 04:38 PM Jun 2015

Will Bernie Sanders cause Hillary Clinton to go "too far left" ?



I heard some talking head, on the talk shows this morning, harken back to the race of Bush, Sr when he was challenged by Patrick Buchanan. He/She said that Buchanan was getting about 30% in the race but it weakened Bush by making him go too far right, paraphrasing.

Hillary has come out with some very strong comments on guns. Bernie has not. Hillary has also said she did not agree with the "fast track" for the President, I have also read. Do these moves to the left hurt Hillary in the general election? Is she going "too far left"?
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will Bernie Sanders cause Hillary Clinton to go "too far left" ? (Original Post) kentuck Jun 2015 OP
Yes. WAY too far Left 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #1
Ha! Nailed it. kath Jun 2015 #24
Hillary has shown that she will say and do whatever the heck it takes to get a persons vote madokie Jun 2015 #2
Yeppers and the reason her trustworthiness is above 50% in the polling. She won't be elected with Purveyor Jun 2015 #10
talk.left, govern right elehhhhna Jun 2015 #3
Don't I wish. SheilaT Jun 2015 #4
Mic Drop.... sgtbenobo Jun 2015 #32
I think that analysis is all off. Bush senior was hurt by Perot, not still_one Jun 2015 #5
I honestly think that most people recognize the difference between campaign rhetoric and djean111 Jun 2015 #6
When "campaign rhetoric" is just lies wrapped in roses. L0oniX Jun 2015 #21
I sure hope so. I worry about low info voters. merrily Jun 2015 #26
Nothing she has said hasn't been generally safe HereSince1628 Jun 2015 #7
It exposes her lack of vision and principles Grilled Charlie Jun 2015 #8
...and no pay apprenticeships for the few with no job guarantees. L0oniX Jun 2015 #20
Another lame attempt to "Naderize" Bernie - FAIL nt 99th_Monkey Jun 2015 #9
No. n/t zappaman Jun 2015 #11
Think of the horror: Someone moving half way toward LBJ! Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #12
Shouldn't be a problem for someone who claims to following in FDR's foot steps. L0oniX Jun 2015 #19
LOL! merrily Jun 2015 #28
Laughing Out Loud here. What a wonderfully witty choice of words. Betty Karlson Jun 2015 #35
Possible, but I think unlikely. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2015 #13
Actually, left positions on issues poll extremely well, as long as no one labels them. merrily Jun 2015 #29
Arrange the following from left to right. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2015 #34
What's to far left? Nt newfie11 Jun 2015 #14
LEFT behind at the finish line aspirant Jun 2015 #15
The Day After & Left Behind ...they aren't just movies. L0oniX Jun 2015 #18
Oh in that case newfie11 Jun 2015 #22
Violent overthrow of the government. merrily Jun 2015 #30
Most voters should take her sadoldgirl Jun 2015 #16
Don't worry ...it will be temporary in order to get enough votes ...then comes bus time. L0oniX Jun 2015 #17
Where she goes for expediency sake doesn't matter, it's where she's been. SaranchaIsWaiting Jun 2015 #23
Is this just about "God, Guns, Gays?" Ron Green Jun 2015 #25
lols mahina Jun 2015 #27
Hillary is strong enough to run her campaign where she wants to go, she has her opinions. Thinkingabout Jun 2015 #31
What is this too far left of which you speak? Jamastiene Jun 2015 #33
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
1. Yes. WAY too far Left
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 04:41 PM
Jun 2015

for the likes of the .01% greed-heads on Wall St.

But NOT for We the People.

GO BERNIE!!!!!!!!!!!

madokie

(51,076 posts)
2. Hillary has shown that she will say and do whatever the heck it takes to get a persons vote
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 04:41 PM
Jun 2015

follow up I doubt it as follow up doesn't seem to be her stronger suit.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
10. Yeppers and the reason her trustworthiness is above 50% in the polling. She won't be elected with
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 05:20 PM
Jun 2015

those numbers...

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
4. Don't I wish.
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 04:45 PM
Jun 2015

Except that there will not be an ounce of sincerity in her supposed move left, and if she's elected, a couple of years on everyone will be saying, Oh, dear, I just NEVER thought she wasn't a real liberal.

still_one

(92,190 posts)
5. I think that analysis is all off. Bush senior was hurt by Perot, not
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 04:46 PM
Jun 2015

Buchanan, who was far more extreme than bush senior. His son, bush jr. Was extreme right, and the repukes during seniors time were used set with him because the extreme right said bush senior lied when he said no taxes.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
6. I honestly think that most people recognize the difference between campaign rhetoric and
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 04:46 PM
Jun 2015

what a politician is actually going to do. And the difference between campaign rhetoric and what can actually be done.

(Hillary's comments on Fast Track don't actually mean squat at this point in time.)

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
7. Nothing she has said hasn't been generally safe
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 04:53 PM
Jun 2015

The talk about the TPP isn't really anti international banking, it doesn't threaten foreign manufacturers or importers.

Her statements about gun control is what republicans expect anyway. Even if she said nothing about guns, the right would think some democratic group is plotting more gun control.

It would be controversial if she said that HSD and the FBI should work with the NSA to capture and identify all digital communication between government employees and hate groups.

 

Grilled Charlie

(57 posts)
8. It exposes her lack of vision and principles
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 04:56 PM
Jun 2015

Right now she leaning heavily to the left with her vague statements - talking about affordable college and a higher minimum wage. Were she to be elected, she'd lean heavily to the right of those same vague statements and we'll discover that "affordable college" means lower interest rates on student loans and that a higher minimum wage means 8.50 and hour. In other words, she'd go 'all Obama on us'

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
20. ...and no pay apprenticeships for the few with no job guarantees.
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 05:49 PM
Jun 2015

Mean while fuck roads bridges harbors railways etc.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
28. LOL!
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 12:08 AM
Jun 2015

Yes, I, too, have nightmares that the Post Office might not get privatized after all or, worse, that our economy might get a huge boost from the most cost effective health plan in the nation.



Fucking left. Where is Joe McCarthy, now that we really need him?


Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
13. Possible, but I think unlikely.
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 05:25 PM
Jun 2015

Yes, it's a risk to be considered, but I think that the advantages of pushing Hillary further left (possibility of doing more good if she wins, although in practice the Republican-dominated congress will mean that it won't make much difference) outweigh the disadvantages (arguably a slightly lower chance of winning).

merrily

(45,251 posts)
29. Actually, left positions on issues poll extremely well, as long as no one labels them.
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 12:17 AM
Jun 2015

80% approval from Americans of all political persuasions on some issues.

If that were not the case, I very much doubt Hillary would be running on them.

The idea that such issues make a candidate unelectable seem to have been a DLC myth. Besides, the DLC made THE most intractable issues, the ones tied up religious beliefs, the cynosure of the differences betweeh Democrats and Republicans, while dropping and discrediting the popular ones in the name of greater electability. Go figure.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
34. Arrange the following from left to right.
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 03:37 AM
Jun 2015

Mondale, Dukakis, Bill Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Obama.

Yes, single-issue polls sometimes produce results pleasing to the left-wing eye. But declared preference matters far less than revealed preference; of the last 8 presidential elections Democrats have won four and lost four, and I would argue that the two candidates who won were all probably more centrist than the four who lost.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
16. Most voters should take her
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 05:40 PM
Jun 2015

campaign rhetoric as just that, and then for themselves
add to each of her newly found left proposals the words:
perhaps, if circumstances allow it, if it were possible, etc.
in addition to asking themselves whether they could take
these to the bank.

Ron Green

(9,822 posts)
25. Is this just about "God, Guns, Gays?"
Sun Jun 21, 2015, 11:57 PM
Jun 2015

Is that how she goes "left?" Enough of the Culture War! The biggest favor Bernie could do for Hillary would be to drive her not to the left, but to the truth.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
31. Hillary is strong enough to run her campaign where she wants to go, she has her opinions.
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 12:26 AM
Jun 2015

She is right on the gun issue, BTW most Americans agree with gun control bills. Actually many thinks she will go further to the right in the general.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
33. What is this too far left of which you speak?
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 01:48 AM
Jun 2015


I think the country is so evenly split at this point that the answer to your question is I don't know. It could go either way, as far as I can tell.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will Bernie Sanders cause...