Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 08:51 AM Jun 2015

Same old, same old.


:- High-profile mass murder committed with firearms (Columbine, Sandy Hook, Newtown, Charleston, etc, etc).

:- Gun control advocates: "let's restrict access to firearms, so that things like this happen more rarely".

:- Gun rights advocates: "We have enough votes in Congress to stop you".

:- Gun control advocates: "Oh".

Rinse, repeat.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Same old, same old. (Original Post) Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2015 OP
Rinse and repeat til we remove enough gun rights advocates votes from Congress. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #1
I can sum up the problem with that in one word: gerrymandering. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2015 #2
Reread my post. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #4
The senate doesn't have the votes to pass gun control either Travis_0004 Jun 2015 #7
No, but I'm not certain the Democrats won't take the Senate back. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2015 #9
There has got to be some way to babylonsister Jun 2015 #3
What makes you think that. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2015 #5
HSD and FBI are really interested in suveillance capability... HereSince1628 Jun 2015 #6
Do you agree with this poster? oneshooter Jun 2015 #8
Yes. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2015 #10
Ugh ... YEAH Cosmocat Jun 2015 #13
Hear! Hear! Wounded Bear Jun 2015 #11
After Sandy Hook,people were all sure it was going to change Cosmocat Jun 2015 #12

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. Rinse and repeat til we remove enough gun rights advocates votes from Congress.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 08:55 AM
Jun 2015

The push after a mass murder should not be simply to pass some legislation, but to make a big stink about the people blocking it in Congress in their own districts and states. To find the outraged RW voters who voted in those bozos, but are appalled by the massacre, and get them to electorally turn against them in the next elections, with a reminder campaign just before the elections.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
2. I can sum up the problem with that in one word: gerrymandering.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 09:03 AM
Jun 2015

My understanding is that there is essentially zero chance of that happening before 2020, and that it's unlikely the 2020-2030 period will be much better.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. Reread my post.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 09:05 AM
Jun 2015

I'm not advocating getting more Dems to vote. I'm saying go specifically after REPUBLICAN voters who are pissed at their elected officials' response to such a massacre. They can't 'gerrymander' Republicans out of their districts and still win.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
9. No, but I'm not certain the Democrats won't take the Senate back.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 12:03 PM
Jun 2015

If I had to place money, I think I'd bet on the Democrats taking the Senate in 2016, but losing it again in 2018, (obviously I'm far from confident of either of those).

But the House looks like it will be an insurmountable obstacle to just about all federal-lead progressive measures until 2020 at the earliest.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
5. What makes you think that.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 09:08 AM
Jun 2015

I don't think that there is one.

It's regrettable that there isn't, but regrettable has nothing to do with untrue.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
6. HSD and FBI are really interested in suveillance capability...
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 09:09 AM
Jun 2015

I suspect that's what will emerge...

enhanced surveillance that provides information that leads to people control rather than gun control.

I suspect pushes for more electronic surveillance on hate group activity would have little resistance from either party.

Cosmocat

(14,565 posts)
13. Ugh ... YEAH
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 12:16 PM
Jun 2015

I said at the time nothing was coming from Sandy Hook.

We are THAT fucked in this country.

Wounded Bear

(58,662 posts)
11. Hear! Hear!
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 12:07 PM
Jun 2015

Typical bullshit Right up there with the old "Now is not the time to go there" fuckfest of a deflection.

The old "well bad people will always get guns" crap defies a simple point of logic. It is FAR easier to get guns illegally in a country with 200-300 million of them, than a country with only 10-20 million of them. Among the sad facts about US gun culture is that people are discouraged and in some ways even prevented from actually determining any meaningful statistics about the problem. Nobody knows how many guns are out there, and crime statistics involving gun use can be disturbingly difficult to mine.

Shit, the fucking Senate refused to vote on a Surgeon General because he had the temerity to suggest that perhaps we should address the medical aspects of thousands of people getting shot every year because, well freedumb or something.

I have open carry gun nuts in my family. They don't make me more comfortable. Not at all.

Cosmocat

(14,565 posts)
12. After Sandy Hook,people were all sure it was going to change
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 12:13 PM
Jun 2015

I was 100 percent certain nothing would happen.

But, the house and kids tuition no it sure.

I had my conservative inlaws going out buying assault weapons because they were so sure there was going to be some kind of law getting rid of them, I told them nothing was going to come from it. Hell, it MADE MONEY for jackass gun makers.

My liberal and progressive friends were all sure something was going to change ...

I told them nothing was happening.

Had that conversation here, people didn't want to accept it, it was a game changer.

Of course, nothing even came close to happening.

We are THAT fucking far gone.

If that didn't move the needle one iota, what will?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Same old, same old.