Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 04:28 AM Jun 2015

The Wildly Different Ways One Senator Responds To Terrorism: Boston Versus Charleston

http://www.nationofchange.org/2015/06/18/the-wildly-different-ways-one-senator-responds-to-terrorism-boston-versus-charleston/

In response to the Boston bombing of 2013, Senator Lindsey Graham demanded that the government do everything it could to learn from the attack and prevent future attacks.

This man, in my view, should be designated as a potential enemy combatant and we should be allowed to question him for intelligence gathering purposes to find out about future attacks and terrorist organizations that may exist that he has knowledge of, and that evidence cannot be used against him in trial. That evidence is used to protect us as a nation.


Many people took issue with Graham’s claim that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who is a U.S. citizen, could be designated as an enemy combatant. But Graham’s conviction that the attack was part of a more systemic problem, based on Tsarnaev’s Muslim faith, was unmistakable. Tsarnaev’s attack killed three people and injured over 250.

Graham’s reaction to Wednesday’s attack on a black church in his home state of South Carolina was very different. (His niece, coincidentally, went to school with the shooter). Graham is adamant that the attack is not evidence of any larger problem.

Graham, who is on his way to Charleston, said his niece did not recall Roof making any statements that were related to race.

“I just think he was one of these whacked out kids. I don’t think it’s anything broader than that,” Graham said. “It’s about a young man who is obviously twisted.”


We already know that the suspect, Dylann Roof, favored white supremacist symbols. Before murdering 9 members of an African-American church, Roof allegedly said “You rape our women and are taking over our country and you have to go.” Terrorism from white supremacist groups is a growing threat in the United States. A 2009 report by the Department of Homeland Security warned of “lone wolf” terrorists and found “[h]eightened interest in legislation for tighter firearms…may be invigorating rightwing extremist activity, specifically the white supremacist and militia movements.” The report was subjected to harsh criticism from Congressional Republicans.


5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Wildly Different Ways One Senator Responds To Terrorism: Boston Versus Charleston (Original Post) eridani Jun 2015 OP
The Republican Party has blood on their hands, coddling radical racists AZ Progressive Jun 2015 #1
coddling radical racists... Kalidurga Jun 2015 #2
More than a few are themselves malaise Jun 2015 #3
Anyone who feels Roof is just another "troubled youth" needs to be called out. Vinca Jun 2015 #4
"His niece, coincidentally, went to school with the shooter" BumRushDaShow Jun 2015 #5

Vinca

(50,276 posts)
4. Anyone who feels Roof is just another "troubled youth" needs to be called out.
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 05:32 AM
Jun 2015

You would have to be willfully ignorant to say such a thing.

BumRushDaShow

(129,063 posts)
5. "His niece, coincidentally, went to school with the shooter"
Sat Jun 20, 2015, 07:02 AM
Jun 2015

Whoa. Looks like a Game. Set. Match. on where he's coming from. Because by golly, his niece could be accused of "palling around with terrorists" and he's not gonna have none of that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Wildly Different Ways...