General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"I'm not afraid of Al-Qaeda! I'm afraid of Al Cracker!"
https://twitter.com/bipartisanism/status/592867021584498689
ladjf
(17,320 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)I think it has to do with the animal instinct to dominate. In the case of the police, they choose victims of the cruelty in proportion to the likelihood that they would ever have repercussions from the shootings. Pets, black people, seniors, mentally ill and something children. All are unarmed and not likely to cause the police person any problem. That is because the police person feels more powerful
than those victims which make them feel a sense of domination, which is a raw animal instinct.
(These are just my theories.)
prayin4rain
(2,065 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)linuxman
(2,337 posts)Did something happen on 9/11/2001 that would have thrown off some of those numbers?
Response to linuxman (Reply #5)
Post removed
You people kill me. Is is hard finding non-fluoridated drinking water?
Response to linuxman (Reply #7)
undeterred This message was self-deleted by its author.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)I'm the sheep. You've seen through the fog. It's all so clear. Everyone is blind but you. We're all being manipulated (except you).
Go make some youtube videos on the moon landing.
Nah, overdone. Can you make me a tutorial on spotting alien-lizard overlords inside people suit who hold elected office? Those are the BEST!
You're a conspiracy theorist. There is a forum here to contain you. Check it out. Sure to be lots of how-tos on keeping the CIA from picking up transmissions from your dental fillings.
Response to linuxman (Reply #9)
undeterred This message was self-deleted by its author.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)Admittedly at you, yes. You are a CT. Sorry, but I'm going to mock CT bullshit until it runs back under the rock it belongs. Your beliefs are right up there with homeopathic medicine, flat-earthers, and anti-vaxers. Bunk, substantiated by bunk, agreed upon by shut-ins and the mal-adjusted. If laughing at that kind of clownery is hostile, sure.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)in that case, yet they spent more money examining the cum spot on Monica's blue dress than documenting and collecting the evidence from the worst terrorist attack in our history.
Put on your phony smug act all you like. You are the conspiracy theorist. Evidently a very gullible one at that.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)Not the guy/you who seem to literally think there was a secret conspiracy.
What's Alex Jones like in real life? Ask him for the "Real" birth certificate while you're at it. Those are the kinds of people you are company with. Think about that.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Township75
(3,535 posts)?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Township75
(3,535 posts)I guess no one is serious about rejecting denouncing and defeating racism.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)brush
(53,778 posts)and not without logic.
In the last year we've witnessed so many killing of black men by whites there is a reason to for that slogan. And then of course there is the Charleston church attack just this week not done by al qaeda.
DemoTex
(25,397 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Ghost in the Machine
(14,912 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)I heard his voice in my head when I read the title. I him.
Reter
(2,188 posts)On Sat Jun 20, 2015, 02:00 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
"I'm not afraid of Al-Qaeda! I'm afraid of Al Cracker!"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026868391
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Call white people crackers is repulsive. If someone had said "I'm afraid of Al Nigger!" They would be banned.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at at Sat Jun 20, 2015, 02:03 AM, and voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm white and I find the alert stupid
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: We don't need the name calling on DU, it is derogatory.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Point is too important to be hidden for bad joke.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: NO COMPARISON. LEAVE IT!
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Instead I will just whip out a classic