Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Scott Walker Dismantled Wisconsin's Environmental Legacy
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-scott-walker-dismantled-wisconsin-s-environmental-legacy/?WT.mc_id=SA_FacebookHow Scott Walker Dismantled Wisconsin's Environmental Legacy
As governor of Wisconsin, the likely Republican presidential nomination-seeker consistently dismissed science and sided with polluters
When Wisconsins new state treasurer Matt Adamczyk took office in January, his first act was to order a highly symbolic change in stationery. Adamczyk, a Republican and one of three members of the board that oversees a small public lands agency, felt passionately that Tia Nelson, the agencys executive secretary, should be struck from the letterhead. As soon became clear, his principal objection to Nelson, daughter of former Wisconsin governor and environmentalist-hero Gaylord Nelson, was that in 200708 she had co-chaired a state task force on climate change at the then-governors request. Adamczyk insisted that climate change is not germane to the agencys task of managing timber assets, and that Nelsons activities thus constituted time theft. When he couldnt convince the two other members of the agencys board to remove Nelson from the letterhead, he tried to get her fired. When that motion failed, he moved to silence her. In April the board voted 21 to ban agency staff from working on or discussing climate change while on the clock. The climate censorship at the public lands agency made national headlines.
...
Since taking office in 2011 Walker has moved to reduce the role of science in environmental policymaking and to silence discussion of controversial subjects, including climate change, by state employees. And he has presided over a series of controversial rollbacks in environmental protection, including relaxing laws governing iron mining and building on wetlands, in both cases to help specific companies avoid regulatory roadblocks. Among other policy changes, he has also loosened restrictions on phosphorus pollution in state waterways, tried to restrict wind energy development and proposed ending funding for a major renewable energy research program housed at the University of WisconsinMadison.
Most recently Walker has targeted the science and educational corps at the states Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which has responsibility for protecting and managing forests and wildlife, along with air and water quality. In his 201517 budget, released in February, he proposed eliminating a third of the DNRs 58 scientist positions and 60 percent of its 18 environmental educator positions. (The cuts were approved by the state legislatures budget committee in May, and the budget is currently making its way through the legislature.) Walker also attempted to convert the citizen board that sets policy for the DNR to a purely advisory body and proposed a 13-year freeze on the states popular land conservation fundboth changes that lawmakers rejected in the face of intense public objections.
...
Kimberlee Wright, executive director of Midwest Environmental Advocates, an environmental law center, works closely with DNR engineers and scientists to review and comment on pollution permits for activities such as wastewater disposal and groundwater pumping under the Clean Water Act. In the past, Wright says, the process was typically straightforward, and she and colleagues were routinely able to hammer out permits that followed the technical requirements of the law. But since Gov. Walker took office, she says, We have not been able to settle one permitweve had to litigate every single challenge. Were often told by [DNR] staff, We know youre right, but youre going to have to sue us because the people above me wont let me issue a technically sufficient permit. Thats a really big differencethe interference in science-based decision-making is pretty complete.
As governor of Wisconsin, the likely Republican presidential nomination-seeker consistently dismissed science and sided with polluters
When Wisconsins new state treasurer Matt Adamczyk took office in January, his first act was to order a highly symbolic change in stationery. Adamczyk, a Republican and one of three members of the board that oversees a small public lands agency, felt passionately that Tia Nelson, the agencys executive secretary, should be struck from the letterhead. As soon became clear, his principal objection to Nelson, daughter of former Wisconsin governor and environmentalist-hero Gaylord Nelson, was that in 200708 she had co-chaired a state task force on climate change at the then-governors request. Adamczyk insisted that climate change is not germane to the agencys task of managing timber assets, and that Nelsons activities thus constituted time theft. When he couldnt convince the two other members of the agencys board to remove Nelson from the letterhead, he tried to get her fired. When that motion failed, he moved to silence her. In April the board voted 21 to ban agency staff from working on or discussing climate change while on the clock. The climate censorship at the public lands agency made national headlines.
...
Since taking office in 2011 Walker has moved to reduce the role of science in environmental policymaking and to silence discussion of controversial subjects, including climate change, by state employees. And he has presided over a series of controversial rollbacks in environmental protection, including relaxing laws governing iron mining and building on wetlands, in both cases to help specific companies avoid regulatory roadblocks. Among other policy changes, he has also loosened restrictions on phosphorus pollution in state waterways, tried to restrict wind energy development and proposed ending funding for a major renewable energy research program housed at the University of WisconsinMadison.
Most recently Walker has targeted the science and educational corps at the states Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which has responsibility for protecting and managing forests and wildlife, along with air and water quality. In his 201517 budget, released in February, he proposed eliminating a third of the DNRs 58 scientist positions and 60 percent of its 18 environmental educator positions. (The cuts were approved by the state legislatures budget committee in May, and the budget is currently making its way through the legislature.) Walker also attempted to convert the citizen board that sets policy for the DNR to a purely advisory body and proposed a 13-year freeze on the states popular land conservation fundboth changes that lawmakers rejected in the face of intense public objections.
...
Kimberlee Wright, executive director of Midwest Environmental Advocates, an environmental law center, works closely with DNR engineers and scientists to review and comment on pollution permits for activities such as wastewater disposal and groundwater pumping under the Clean Water Act. In the past, Wright says, the process was typically straightforward, and she and colleagues were routinely able to hammer out permits that followed the technical requirements of the law. But since Gov. Walker took office, she says, We have not been able to settle one permitweve had to litigate every single challenge. Were often told by [DNR] staff, We know youre right, but youre going to have to sue us because the people above me wont let me issue a technically sufficient permit. Thats a really big differencethe interference in science-based decision-making is pretty complete.
More at the link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 464 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Scott Walker Dismantled Wisconsin's Environmental Legacy (Original Post)
Scuba
Jun 2015
OP
When, back in 2010, Walker appointed Cathy Stepp to the DNR this was obvious
HereSince1628
Jun 2015
#2
ladjf
(17,320 posts)1. The people of Wisconsin had an opportunity to get rid
Walker but didn't do it. Why? I don't know.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)2. When, back in 2010, Walker appointed Cathy Stepp to the DNR this was obvious
A member of a family with big construction interests... everyone saw where this was going.