Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn Open Letter: Why Co-opting “Transracial” in the Case of Rachel Dolezal is Problematic
NOTE: I am friends with one of the authors, Susan Harris OConnor, MSW, and she gave me permission to post this in it's entirety.June 16, 2015
Please direct all media inquiries to Kimberly McKee, PhD at mckee.kimberly@gmail.com.
This past weekend the world took to social media to dissect the events surrounding Rachel Dolezal, the former president of Spokanes NAACP chapter who came under heavy scrutiny for falsely representing herself as black. As part of this real-time discussion, the term transracial is being co-opted to describe Dolezal identifying as black despite being born white.
As members of the adoption community particularly those of us who identify as transracial adoptees we are deeply alarmed by the gross mischaracterization of this term. We find the misuse of transracial, describing the phenomenon of a white woman assuming perceived markers of blackness in order to pass as black, to be erroneous, ahistorical, and dangerous.
Transracial is a term that has long since been defined as the adoption of a child that is of a different race than the adoptive parents. The term most often refers to children of color adopted by white families in the Global North, and has been extensively examined and documented for more than 50 years by academics and members of the adoption triad: adoptees, birthparents, and adoptive parents.
Dolezal and others have perpetuated the false notion that a person can simply choose to identify as a different race or ethnicity. As extensive evidence-based research and first-person narratives have shown, we do not live in a so-called post-racial society. Damaging forces like racism make it virtually impossible for those with black or brown bodies to simply put on or take off race in the same or similar manner that Dolezal has employed. For transracial adoptees, navigating and negotiating the racism in our families, schools, and communities is a regular and compulsory part of our lives.
We also join others who have raised concerns about the misappropriation of the word trans, and the analogy made between Dolezals deception and the experiences of transgender people. For transgender people who have struggled to live their truths in the face of horrific violence and discrimination, we reject this flawed comparison and find it to be irresponsible and offensive.
As our collective cultural awareness and knowledge of racial and gender identities continue to evolve, it is clear that our understanding of them, as well as our understanding of the relationship between them, is outmoded and in need of better expression. The widespread and acute public response to Dolezal signals the pressing need for critical thinkers of all backgrounds to turn their attention to refining language and theory to better reflect our ever-changing lived experiences.
Writer and adoptee Lisa Marie Rollins recently wrote about Dolezals deception and how it derails meaningful conversations about adoption and race. As Rollins explains, the process of transracial adoptees asserting ourselves as people of color is often challenged by either white people or the very communities that mirror our racial and ethnic identities.
In Dolezals interview on NBCs Today show, she justified passing as black in order to be recognized as her sons parent. This questionable and even extreme approach to parenting goes against how families with transracial adoptees should actually tackle issues related to race. Scholars including Barbara Katz Rothman, Heather Jacobson, and Kristi Brian, among others, have examined how adoptive parents incorporate and support familial understanding of their childrens birth culture.
Adoption scholar Dr. John Raible affirms how a deeper consciousness of issues related to race may occur among white families with transracial adoptees. But this does not mean that white parents become people of color in the process. Instead, adoptive families need to create spaces for transracial adoptees to explore and construct their own identities.
Many of us in the adoption community have experienced the complex, tenuous, and life-long process of claiming our authenticity, making Dolezals claims and the current discussion all the more destructive.
We invite people to become active allies of transracial adoptees. It begins by listening. Actively listen to those who speak about and from the transracial adoption experience.
If you are an ally, we challenge you to examine the various ways that you appropriate our voices, cultures, and identities. Stand behind those of us who are working to dismantle this racist narrative that abuses, discredits, and erases the lives of transracial adoptees, and erases an entire field of academic inquiry. And use your privilege to lift up marginalized voices that need to be heard.
Finally, we encourage people to take time and explore the many articles, organizations, and experts who have worked on transracial adoption issues in order to educate themselves on this important current issue.
Co-opting the term transracial to describe Dolezals behavior exposes the deep denial and erasure of decades of research, writing, and art of transracial adoptees. Thats why we need everyone to stop trying to make this new definition of transracial happen. Its not (and should not) be a thing.
https://medium.com/@Andy_Marra/an-open-letter-why-co-opting-transracial-in-the-case-of-rachel-dolezal-is-problematic-249f79f6d83c
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 533 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An Open Letter: Why Co-opting “Transracial” in the Case of Rachel Dolezal is Problematic (Original Post)
meegbear
Jun 2015
OP
Spazito
(50,365 posts)1. Excellent...
"Co-opting the term transracial to describe Dolezals behavior exposes the deep denial and erasure of decades of research, writing, and art of transracial adoptees. Thats why we need everyone to stop trying to make this new definition of transracial happen. Its not (and should not) be a thing.""
I am appalled at the co-opting of the term, it is a false and damaging misuse of it's true meaning.
Thank you for posting this, it is a must-read, imo.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)2. someone who gets it
I think it is disturbing that repuke talking points are being presented on DU as "inquiries"
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)3. Excellent clarification nt