General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn A.I.G. Case, Surprise Ruling That Could End All Bailouts
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/business/dealbook/surprise-ruling-finds-bailout-shorted-aig.htmlWhen the Federal Reserve propped up A.I.G. in September 2008, unlike its approach with most of the big banks, it threw out the companys chief executive and took control of 79.9 percent of the company, nearly wiping out many of its shareholders. Taxpayers got all of their money back, and then some, receiving a profit of more than $20 billion.
But in a stunning ruling, Judge Thomas C. Wheeler of the United States Court of Federal Claims said on Monday that those terms were too draconian. In other words, he suggested taxpayers should have offered A.I.G. a more generous deal.
The judges decision could have far-reaching consequences should another financial crisis occur and if history is any guide, one will. Legal experts say that the ruling, coupled with certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law enacted after the crisis, makes it unlikely the government would ever rescue a failing institution, even if an intervention was warranted.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)There shouldn't be 'too big to fail'.
TexasTowelie
(112,362 posts)I held stock in a company that was a counter-party to the AIG derivatives contract so while AIG was about to go under the stock tripled. I saw that the housing market was over-inflated back in 2003 and when I had a chance to make some money in 2004 I invested in that stock. It was probably the best financial move I ever made.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Despite its government-sounding name, isn't the Federal Reserve actually a private entity? Because I'm pretty sure I wasn't consulted on the subject of bailing out these financial miscreants. My feeling was more in line with that sign someone had saying "JUMP! YOU FUCKERS!"
We'll see if Judge Wheeler's ruling holds up through the appeals process.
Sanity Claws
(21,852 posts)Isn't the logical conclusion that next time Around better terms will be offered to the institution that's too big to fail? Logical insofar as our government is owned by these bastards.