General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDavid Brooks Warns of Economic Collapse and War Without TPP
The Washington chattering class is really upset that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) looks like its going down. David Brooks pulls out all the stops today, using his NYT column to yell at "Tea Party" Democrats for not supporting the fast-track authority that would facilitate the passage of the TPP.
Unfortunately, Brooks was largely unarmed with facts when it came to the attack. To start, he tells readers;
"The North American Free Trade Agreement, for example, probably didnt affect the American economy too much. But the Mexican economy has taken off. With more opportunities, Mexican workers feel less need to sneak into the U.S."
<snip>
Got that, the Chinese are coming. So if we don't pass a trade pact that will make the countries of Pacific region pay more for our drugs and other protected products they will all turn to China.
Are you scared yet?
Okay, look for more of these hysterical diatribes as the one percent tries their best to sell the TPP. They have tons of money and power, so they may pull it off, but at least we get the entertainment value of these people making fools of themselves.
<snip>
http://www.cepr.net/blogs/beat-the-press/david-brooks-warns-of-economic-collapse-and-war-without-tpp
and here is the piece by that ratfucker. If these "arguments" seem familiar, it's because they're remarkably similar to the ones we see here from the DU pro-TPP contingent, the White House and the repukes:
The Democratic Tea Party
Last week, the Congressional Democrats defeated the underpinnings of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement. Lets count up the things these Democrats will have done if this policy stands.
Impoverish the worlds poor. Theres an argument over what trade agreements do to workers in the nations rich countries, but there is no question they have a positive impact on people in the poorer ones.
The North American Free Trade Agreement, for example, probably didnt affect the American economy too much. But the Mexican economy has taken off. With more opportunities, Mexican workers feel less need to sneak into the U.S. As Fareed Zakaria has pointed out, a regime that was anti-American has turned into one that is pro-American.
In Asia, the American-led open trade era has created the greatest reduction in poverty in human history. The Pacific trade deal would lift the living standards of the poorest Asians, especially the 90 million people of Vietnam.
As Tyler Cowen, an economist at George Mason University, wrote in his Marginal Revolution blog: Do you get that progressives? Poorest country = biggest gainer. Isnt that what we are looking for?
<snip>
Imperil world peace. The Pacific region will either be organized by American rules or Chinese rules. By voting against the trade deal, Democrats went a long way toward guaranteeing that Chinese rules will dominate.
As various people have noted, the Democratic vote last week was a miniversion of the effort to destroy the League of Nations after World War I. It damaged an institution that might head off future conflict.
<snip>
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/david-brooks-the-democratic-tea-party.html
Rex
(65,616 posts)What kind of garbage is that? You don't know?
NRaleighLiberal
(60,018 posts)Johonny
(20,880 posts)What part of the service sector is booming? My bank has replaced all my tellers, the check out line is all being turned to self service, the phone banks are all manned by robo-callers... seriously David Brooks is stuck in the 1990s. The service economy is dying fast. The world of automation is coming and it doesn't need you to serve anyone... People stuck in the past have no business explaining to us the Future economy to come. David Brooks is a fool with a nice vocabulary.
ananda
(28,874 posts)nt
samsingh
(17,600 posts)underpants
(182,868 posts)Can you imagine a world, our world, with wars going on??
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,502 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)and TP his house with rolls of this to show him that we can have fun giving him the TPP (Toilet Paper Party) he so much wants!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)for global peace and prosperity. To a large extent they were building on Woodrow Wilson's "The removal, so far as possible, of all economic barriers and the establishment of an equality of trade conditions among all the nations consenting to the peace and associating themselves for its maintenance" and his League of Nations idea both of which were destroyed by the republican Senate and presidents in the 1920's.
Most of us agree with the 'trade is good' concept but question whether TPP is consistent with what Wilson, FDR and Truman pushed.
marmar
(77,088 posts)All the TPP would do is accelerate those things.