Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 02:46 AM Jun 2015

Fast-track Hands the Money Monopoly to Private Banks — Permanently

http://ellenbrown.com/2015/06/11/fast-tracking-tisa-stealth-block-to-monetary-reform/

The BOE report confirmed what money reformers have been saying for decades: that banks do not act simply as intermediaries, taking in the deposits of “savers” and lending them to borrowers, keeping the spread in interest rates. Rather, banks actually create deposits when they make loans. The BOE report said that private banks now create 97 percent of the British money supply. The US money supply is created in the same way.

Graeber underscored the dramatic implications:

. . . [M]oney is really just an IOU. The role of the central bank is to preside over a legal order that effectively grants banks the exclusive right to create IOUs of a certain kind, ones that the government will recognise as legal tender by its willingness to accept them in payment of taxes. There’s really no limit on how much banks could create, provided they can find someone willing to borrow it.


Politically, said Graeber, revealing these facts is taking an enormous risk:

Just consider what might happen if mortgage holders realised the money the bank lent them is not, really, the life savings of some thrifty pensioner, but something the bank just whisked into existence through its possession of a magic wand which we, the public, handed over to it.


If money is just an IOU, why are we delivering the exclusive power to create it to an unelected, unaccountable, non-transparent private banking monopoly? Why are we buying into the notion that the government is broke – that it must sell off public assets and slash public services in order to pay off its debts? The government could pay its debts in the same way private banks pay them, simply with accounting entries on its books. What will happen when a critical mass of the populace realizes that we’ve been vassals of a parasitic banking system based on a fraud – that we the people could be creating money as credit ourselves, through publicly-owned banks that returned the profits to the people?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fast-track Hands the Money Monopoly to Private Banks — Permanently (Original Post) eridani Jun 2015 OP
This - and this OP should have a lot more recs, IMO - djean111 Jun 2015 #1
What some guy figured out around Napoleon's time. Octafish Jun 2015 #2
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. This - and this OP should have a lot more recs, IMO -
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 08:32 AM
Jun 2015
If money is just an IOU, why are we delivering the exclusive power to create it to an unelected, unaccountable, non-transparent private banking monopoly? Why are we buying into the notion that the government is broke – that it must sell off public assets and slash public services in order to pay off its debts? The government could pay its debts in the same way private banks pay them, simply with accounting entries on its books. What will happen when a critical mass of the populace realizes that we’ve been vassals of a parasitic banking system based on a fraud – that we the people could be creating money as credit ourselves, through publicly-owned banks that returned the profits to the people?


I believe that the aim of all the new "trade" agreements is to privatize everything and hand over government to corporations. Pure and simple.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
2. What some guy figured out around Napoleon's time.
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:00 AM
Jun 2015

“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” -- Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild.



Baron de Rothschild and Prescott Bush, sharing a moment and a bit o' information in this small world, looks like mid-1950s.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fast-track Hands the Mone...