General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI've seen many threads speculating on when Bernie will drop out...
...and I notice no one has suggested that even if he were behind Hillary after super Tuesday he might very well decide to take it all the way to the convention.
Look at it this way-many have suggested his entire purpose is to move the party to the left. He knew from the start that his path to the White House would be narrow.But he CAN definitely push his ideals all the way and because he is a democratic socialist it means there could be no repercussions-the DNC needs him in the caucus if he remains as a senator and it is not worth their while to try to "punish" him. I for one would gladly continue my (limited) financial support to keep his positions front and center in a democratic dialogue.
So while some might hope that wishing would make it so I believe my dog might stay in the fight till the final whistle blows...
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Don't candidates usually decide that for themselves?
But I've seen speculation here that he would decide to drop out early, but it occurs to me that even if he lost every primary there would be no need to drop out-He has stated repeatedly that he is about the message and not the messenger. If he could demonstrate even a relatively low-say 25%-level of support nationwide he could convince the DNC of the need to incorporate his position into the party platform.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)No they are not.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)this is way early, he is performing way better than the other two democrats in the race.
But then again, we read the exact same language in 2008. The parallels to THAT race are starting to be extremely striking.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Before he passes America's Next President in the polls. It might already be too late in New Hampshire, dammit!
Regards,
TWM
peacebird
(14,195 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)And they, as well as any threads speculating when any announced candidate will drop out, are extremely premature.
The very last thing we need is for Hillary Clinton, or any candidate at all, to simply coast to the nomination without any challenger. It's generally okay for that to happen with a sitting President, but not any other year.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)some threads that bristled with hostility at the very thought Bernie might run, but I'm not going to bother to try to find any such.
I'm glad you haven't seen any, and maybe they really aren't out there, and the OP here is simply mistaken.
TBF
(32,106 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 15, 2015, 01:59 PM - Edit history (1)
...but even if I am wrong I still think people discussing him dropping out really don't understand the man they're facing. He can lose and still give his ideals a win. Hillary can't...
Edit:spelling-I hate when some idiot (me) uses the wrong "their".
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)just added my 2 cents.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)just an interesting observation!
Autumn
(45,120 posts)the nomination and the Presidency. The more people that hear him the stronger his campaign grows.
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)...that's why in their first rallies Bernie talked about his positions and Hillary talked about her Mommy.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)with gallons of hairspray.
bluesbassman
(19,379 posts)I'm a great tipper so I'm sure the servers will be happy!
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)That is not logical.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Right after the conclusion of his 2nd term
mmonk
(52,589 posts)There's not much reason for us to vote for except for game changers (for those of us who live in DickSea and have to endure crooked and rigged elections).
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and way back when, I only saw one or two. Don't have a clue why you'd bring such a topic up now.
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)link from today...
dirtydickcheney
(242 posts)MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)Evidently I have all the right people on ignore.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Scott Walker or Jeb Bush's IQ, what little there is, each time they open their mouths.
I could have written that better, but the thread is silly so I was silly.
I do wish those who interview him would stop referring to him as a "Socialist"
he is NOT one of them, he is a "Democratic Socialist"
I know I heard it over the weekend, not sure where, maybe Maher
MADem
(135,425 posts)The whole primary system used to be a lot more truncated. Now, with primaries everywhere, and a huge number of them being showpieces, candidates have to spread a lot more cash around than they used to have to do.
The GOP Clown Car Crew will start dropping like flies because they've got to spend the most money, early on, to try to break out from the pack--they'll be placing big bets on individual primaries and if they don't prevail or have a strong showing, they won't be able to go to the well for more to go on to the next contest.
The people running for the Democratic nomination don't quite have this problem--there are fewer of them, first of all, and when the field is smaller, there's more time for every candidate to get a little air time, and that can obviate the requirement to buy a lot of ads and pound people to death with imagery and repeated pleasantries. It's not quite the shoving and backstabbing effort that a primary with ten or fifteen candidates might be.