Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 02:11 PM Jun 2015

Marco Rubio, Pervert

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/11/florida-adoption-bill_n_7565046.html


Sen. Marco Rubio (R) was among the Florida state legislators who voted for the so-called "Scarlet Letter" law in 2001 that required single mothers to publish their sexual histories in the newspaper in order to place their babies up for adoption.

Five U.S. congressmen -- Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart (R), Lois Frankel (D), Jeff Miller (R), Gus Bilirakis (R) and Dennis Ross (R) -- were state legislators at the time and voted for the controversial bill. Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D), Frederica Wilson (D), Daniel Webster (R) and Bill Posey (R), who were also state legislators back then, voted against it.

The law, which passed with overwhelming majorities in the House and Senate, required unwed moms who wished to put their babies up for adoptions to post details about their recent sexual encounters in the newspaper in an attempt to contact the father, even if the woman was a victim of rape or incest. The purpose of the bill was to inform estranged biological fathers that their children were being adopted and give them the chance to intervene.

The "Scarlet Letter" law gained media attention this week after The Huffington Post reported that former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) had advocated for the public shaming of unwed parents in his 1995 book. Bush allowed the controversial law to go into effect in 2001, but signed a repeal of it two years later after it was successfully challenged in court.

The fact that Rubio, a 2016 presidential candidate, supported the bill could inoculate Bush from criticism that he allowed it to go into effect if Bush decides to throw his hat in the ring. The Gainesville Sun reported in 2002 that some lawmakers -- including Frankel, a longtime women's right activist -- did not realize the newspaper publication provision was in the bill when they voted for it. "I have to admit I'm horrified that I voted for this," Frankel told the Sun at the time.

Rubio and the other current members of Congress who supported the bill did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

I am speechless. War on women? Fuck YEAH!

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
1. It's hard to believe that passed in THIS century. Disgusting. That should finish both him and Jeb,
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 02:16 PM
Jun 2015

but we all know it won't.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
3. Thought they were pro-life, they should applaud women who carried a baby to put it up for adoption
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 02:29 PM
Jun 2015

Instead of aborting it, right? Aren't the the uterus police? The ones who care so deeply about every zygote?
What's up with shaming and humiliating the women who chose to give a baby up for adoption?

(Disclaimer: I am totally prochoice. I support whichever choice a woman makes, and to me there is no one choice that is better than the other)

SunSeeker

(51,728 posts)
4. That law makes it clear "pro-lifers" are about punishing women for having sex, not saving babies.
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 04:25 PM
Jun 2015

Mind you, these are the same folks who don't want to provide health care for the baby once it is born, nor give the mom a living wage so she can feed the baby.

 

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)
10. What about trans men who were pregnant when identifying as female? I realize "war on women"...
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 04:57 PM
Jun 2015

is politically catchy but it's very divisive to exclude trans men.

libodem

(19,288 posts)
11. What a perfrct excuse
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 05:00 PM
Jun 2015

For abortion. Adoption needs to be as private as possible to especially protect underage girls. Are they trying to prevent any one from relinquishing their child?

Good lord that's a punitive breech of privacy. Why allow rapist/molesters access to their kids? That IS perverted.

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)
13. I heard Jeb Bush say on TV the other day (it might have been a tape from an earlier time- not sure)
Fri Jun 12, 2015, 05:17 PM
Jun 2015

that the newspaper postings by the mom before adoption of the child was to get father's to pay child support.

If that was even part of the reasoning at the time, it was an extremely poor reason - to sacrifice the privacy of a mother in hopes of getting a few dollars of child support.
Likely many or most of those fathers were unable to pay any support money. Some may not have even been aware that they had fathered a child.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marco Rubio, Pervert