Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(59,237 posts)
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 11:39 PM Jun 2015

Had Josh Duggar been prosecuted, Duggars would have lost the right to home school.

In the state of Arkansas, where the Duggars reside, it is illegal to homeschool if there is a sex offender present in the home. Yes, it turns out Arkansas has at least one very sensible home schooling law. The Act in question is No. 1787 of 2001 — passed one year before the reported start of Josh Duggar’s crimes.

It is alleged that Josh began molesting girls in 2002. The crimes were not investigated until more than three years later, after the Arkansas statute of limitations for his offences had expired. Josh continued to live in the home until 2008.

According to the police report, in 2002 a minor told Jim Bob Duggar that Josh had been fondling her while she was sleeping. Josh admitted to this in July 2002. Despite this, Jim Bob did not go to the police. It seems likely that a family as active in homeschool advocacy as the Duggars would be aware of the law in their home state.

By covering up Josh’s actions, it was possible for the Duggars to continue home schooling their children with a known sexual predator in the home.


http://www.patheos.com/blogs/leavingfundamentalism/2015/05/29/had-josh-duggar-been-prosecuted-duggars-would-have-lost-the-right-to-home-school/#sthash.6weMgEpd.dpuf

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Had Josh Duggar been prosecuted, Duggars would have lost the right to home school. (Original Post) RandySF Jun 2015 OP
It's possible he wouldn't continue to live there. Renew Deal Jun 2015 #1
Interesting,,, KarenS Jun 2015 #2
He might have been removed from the home. Kalidurga Jun 2015 #3
Of course Duggar knew about it; he voted for it in 2001, in the Arkansas House of Representatives muriel_volestrangler Jun 2015 #4

KarenS

(4,087 posts)
2. Interesting,,,
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 11:43 PM
Jun 2015

Seems like there were several reasons for them to drag their feet.

Doing the right thing was never part of their agenda.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
3. He might have been removed from the home.
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 12:31 AM
Jun 2015

If it was up to me he would have been removed at least until he was 18, he would have been ordered to have no contact with the victims until they reached an age where they could decide if they wanted to have contact with their brother. No contact with the unrelated victim. He would have gotten real counseling instead of the pseudo bullshit that he got and his sisters would have gotten real counseling as well. And the whole family would have been investigated, I don't think these things happen in a bubble. It doesn't mean the parents are guilty of anything, but the parenting skills definitely need looking at to make sure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Had Josh Duggar been pros...