Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HomerRamone

(1,112 posts)
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 09:42 PM Jun 2015

What’s Wrong with the Administration’s Trade-Deal Arguments

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/eric-zuesse/62575/what-s-wrong-with-the-administration-s-trade-deal-arguments

The system in these ’trade’ deals does not allow nations to sue international corporations, but it does allow international corporations to sue any signatory nation that, a given suing international corporation alleges, has violated the treaty’s international standard — in other words, that has applied or instituted a standard higher than the international treaty allows...

So: what’s really at issue here is a transfer from national democratic sovereignty to, instead, international-corporate sovereignty, in which international corporations will have locked-in an international dictatorial control over a large portion of what it is that national governments do, and necessarily must do, in order to serve the public good.

The whole thing is a corrupt con-job.

What is at stake here is nothing less than whether the future of the world will be national democratic governments, or instead an international fascist government. Regardless of whether the old ideal of an international democratic world-federalist government (the old idea of a world government) was a good one, the bringing-about of an international corporate dictatorship is a monstrosity: the very opposite of an international democracy.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What’s Wrong with the Administration’s Trade-Deal Arguments (Original Post) HomerRamone Jun 2015 OP
You nailed it. djean111 Jun 2015 #1
It is the same bullshit "arguments" as always. We are supposed to buy because it is a new salesman. TheKentuckian Jun 2015 #2
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. You nailed it.
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 09:49 PM
Jun 2015

And soon you will hear about how this helps poor Vietnamese farmers.
Who will also get screwed.
I have called and emailed and signed, but I think this is in the bag. AF1 trips for the recalcitrant Dems, I hear.
So all I can do is never vote for anyone who votes yes on this, or anyone who helped to craft it, or anyone who has shilled for it.
And Obama endorsing Dems who vote yes, to help them with the next elections? Oh, as if THAT would change my mind. Bwah! The guy who is in bed with the GOP for this, thinking an endorsement from him for someone I won't vote for because they voted yes? What kind of logic is that?

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
2. It is the same bullshit "arguments" as always. We are supposed to buy because it is a new salesman.
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 10:18 PM
Jun 2015

Then down the line if there is any meat left to pick off the bones there will be another salesperson using the same pitch and as always "this time it will be different" will be declared as another pig in the poke is shoved down our gullets.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What’s Wrong with the Adm...