Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJeb Bush, Taking His Time, Tests the Legal Definition of Candidate
Jeb Bush, Taking His Time, Tests the Legal Definition of CandidateBy ERIC LICHTBLAU and NICK CORASANITI at the NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/04/us/politics/jeb-bush-taking-his-time-tests-the-legal-definition-of-candidate.html?_r=0
"SNIP................
For a candidate to avoid restrictions by simply not declaring his candidacy, he said, makes a mockery of the law.
The issue is not one of mere semantics. If Mr. Bush did declare that he is running, it would bring a raft of election restrictions, including a limit of $2,700 on contributions, and a ban on coordinating with a super PAC he has used to raise money.
But much of campaign finance law is a subject of dispute, and defining who is a candidate is no exception.
David M. Mason, a former F.E.C. commissioner, said a 1981 case involving the possible presidential campaign of the former Florida governor Reubin Askew gives politicians wide latitude to take steps to explore a run.
..............SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 574 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeb Bush, Taking His Time, Tests the Legal Definition of Candidate (Original Post)
applegrove
Jun 2015
OP
morningfog
(18,115 posts)1. You can still coordinate with SuperPACs after declaring, ask Hillary.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)3. Ask Hillary what?
Got any links?
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)5. I have no links unfortunately,
but I heard that too, and heard the head of the
FEC admit that they refuse to do anything about
these rule breakings, since they are a 3:3 group.
Obviously they know, what some of the candidates
are doing, but are unwilling to step in.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)6. Ask Hillary how to spit in the face of campaign finance law
by coordinating with multiple SuperPACs as an announced and running candidate. The PACs she is coordinating with take and spend unlimited soft money. If a repub did it we'd be pissed all the hell. We should be with Hillary doing it too.
There were several posts here on it over the last few days, and Hillary's supporters were defending her actions.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)2. Come on Jebbie ......... plenty of room in the clown car
applegrove
(118,696 posts)4. The GOP loves to push the rules around.
kentuck
(111,104 posts)7. Good info!
Thanks!