Fox’s Megyn Kelly Won’t Be Too Mean To Duggars About Kid-Diddling Because Bill Clinton. Really.

[niyad]

(there is a video at the link, for those who can stomach it)

The Clenis Rises Again


Fox’s Megyn Kelly Won’t Be Too Mean To Duggars About Kid-Diddling Because Bill Clinton. Really.

So here is a thing we know. We know that Josh Duggar did naughty sex things to five little girls, four of whom were his sisters. And Ma and Pa Duggar — being strict adherents of a religious cult that believes if you inappropriately touch your sister, it’s because her unholy whore hole was just askin’ for it, like the Bible says — thought it best to keep that quiet instead of, like, protecting their daughters. How do we know this? Because the Duggars released statements admitting that Josh did a bad, but he is sorry and his family is all A-OK with that now, and none of them have denied any of the details in the police report or any reported details about how they “handled” Josh’s molestation of his sisters.

So of course Fox News is the perfect place for the family to appear in public for the first time since the story broke, because Fox is the official sympathetic ear for disgusting people and criminals, as long as they are the conservative kind. The interview airs later this week, but Megyn Kelly had a chat with fellow Fox personality Howard Kurtz, who used to be some kind of so-called journalist before he stopped pretending altogether, to give us a hint of what kind of hard-hitting journalism we can expect from the self-described “tough but fair journalist”: This isn’t going to be a cross-examination of a family. It’s going to be an interview. I want to hear their story, and I think America wants to hear their story now.

What’s been remarkable to me, as, I admit, somebody who doesn’t watch this show, is to see how many in the media have handled it, from jumping to “they’re the worst, the house of horrors, you know, this family is sick sick sick,” to people like this woman on CNN trying to make this the problem of the Republican presidential field.

. . . . . . .

Bill Clinton was accused of RAPE. He has been accused by several women of sexually assaulting them. But the fact that a presidential candidate has posed with some random member of the family that’s going through this issue is somehow a problem for the GOPers?!?!

. . . . .




Read more at http://wonkette.com/587217/foxs-megyn-kelly-wont-be-too-mean-to-duggars-about-kid-diddling-because-bill-clinton-really#7yxu2LLJBHOWbLJO.99

[malthaussen]

1. What, she couldn't work in Benghazi? n/t

[niyad]

2. give her time!!

[mercuryblues]

3. The rape

that I associate with the Clinton name is when his young cousin was raped by a serial rapist, Wayne DuMond. Huckabee pushed for him to be paroled. Upon which, DuMond raped and murdered another woman. As a matter of fact, there was a big push from right wingers to pardon him. Because Dumond A/ found Jesus and B/ was railroaded by Clinton into prison.

Kelley can eat my shit

[niyad]

4. this is the first I had heard of clinton being accused of rape. affairs, yes, but not rape.

kelly needs a job where she never has to exercise her brain. . .oh, wait, she already has one.

[mercuryblues]

5. Juanita Broaddrick

accused him of rape in '98. There was no evidence to prove or disprove the allegations. That is all media like faux needs to say this under the veneer of honesty. Clinton was a womanizer that is for sure, but a rapist? Stories like this make me believe that is why the RWers believe all women lie about rape.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_Broaddrick