General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSunsetting A Few Parts Of The PATRIOT Act May Be Symbolic And Good, But It Won't Really Change Much
If Congress does nothing, section 215 will sunset. And this is exactly what reformers should be asking for. The fact is, sunset is the only thing that will definitely stop massive spying under section 215. It wont stop mass surveillance more generally, but killing the law that NSA and FBI have abused for years is the first step.
But, still, she says, it's important and will have an impact. In particular, she notes that while basic reform -- a la the USA Freedom Act -- might have made sense before, "the political winds have shifted." In particular, she points to the the big 2nd Circuit appeals court ruling that noted that Section 215 never really authorized the bulk records collection program in the first place -- along with a growing number of elected officials who appear to believe the intelligence community has gone too far. Her fear, is that if we passed something like the USA Freedom Act, it will take away any chance at real reform, whereas sunsetting may force the issue:
While section 215 covers business records, section 214, also known as the "pen register/trap & trace" authority, covers the acquisition of communications metadata (things like dialed phone numbers and email or Internet Protocol addresses) in real time.
Years before the current version of the NSA telephone program under 215 was born, the government employed similar arguments to persuade the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to bless a bulk program vacuuming up international internet metadata under the aegis of section 214. Though that program was ended in 2011likely at least in part because NSA was able to obtain much of the same data by collecting it overseas, with fewer restrictionsthe authority is permanent.
Also permanent are National Security Letters or NSLs, which that allow the FBI to obtain a more limited range of telecommunications and financial records without even needing to seek judicial approval. Unsurprisingly, the government loves these streamlined tools, and used them so promiscuously that the FBI didnt even bother using 215 for more than a year after the passage of the Patriot Act. Inspector General reports have also made clear that the FBI is happy to substitute NSLs for 215 orders when even the highly accommodating FISC manages a rare display of backbone. In at least one case, when the secret court refused an application for journalists records on First Amendment grounds, the Bureau turned around and obtained the same data using National Security Letters.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150529/12193431151/sunsetting-few-parts-patriot-act-may-be-symbolic-good-it-wont-really-change-much-itself.shtml
delrem
(9,688 posts)But it is only now that debate is ended that there seems to be any media awareness of it, and articles like this are exceedingly rare. Where was the debate?
Don't tell me that idiots yelling "hang Snowden after a quick military trial" vs folks saying "hey hey hey, hold on -- hold on -- this is about information that we NEEDED to know" was a debate, and that this legislation is some response to that debate. I don't see the US gov't putting matters up to public debate, *before* they're written as final copy, at any level. Hardly anyone seems to notice that this is the modus operandi.
A lot of these these politicians still want to "get" Snowden, right?
Is there something about this legislation, the way it's introduced as letting PATRIOT act provisions for spying "sunset" so there can be a corrected FREEDOM act, that retroactively suggests or even establishes that all spying to this point has been "legal" and "by the book"? So there's no need, ever, to *examine* what happened in an open court of law?
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Were all gonna die!
Its fear politics and seemly very successful.
Don't miss the John Oliver video its good to have a laugh.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017269005