General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInside the Happiness Racket
I think that up to $85K or so money can buy happiness, but more than that doesn't make anyone happier. The amount tells us pretty much what is needed to get basic economic security.
http://inthesetimes.com/article/17929/inside-the-happiness-racket
Why has this private, personal emotion gained so much public importance? In the 19th century, captains of industry worried about the toll that repetitive physical labor would eventually take on a workers body. Today, in the knowledge economy, they worry about the gradual depletion of mental productivitythe creeping of boredom, apathy, pessimism and absenteeism among workers that in turn threatens a companys bottom line.
When an employee is unhappy at work, it stands to reason that one of two things is fundamentally at fault: the employee or the work. The happiness industry exonerates capitalism. Its not that the job is underpaid, the hours unreasonable or the product pointless. Its that the employee is just unhappy. She should be encouraged to eat better, exercise and practice mindfulness. Or, if those things fail, seek a pharmaceutical remedy. In the American Psychiatric Associations 1980 revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the number of official forms of mental illness ballooned by more than half, followed by a similar rise in the number of antidepressant drugs approved to treat them.
Then, of course, theres retail therapy, based on the hope that money really can buy happiness. The British economist William Stanley Jevons theorized that the value of a commodity might lie in whether we believe it will make us happy, rather than in any inherent quality, such as the labor that went into producing it. The supposedly objective capitalist market was suddenly transformed into a vast psychological audit.
But what makes us happy? Ask someone and they will most likely answer with fuzzy metaphorical language rather than quantifiable data. For treatment purposessuch as getting a miserable, unproductive patient back to worksuch narratives are time-consuming and scientifically useless. Nor are they much help to marketers: Any viewer of Mad Men is familiar with the idea that ads work best when they appeal to the desires we didnt even know we had.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Thanks for posting. I will have to read the article a bit later, but from the OP, I very much agree with the premise.
eridani
(51,907 posts)With the mythbusting powers for which she is acclaimed, Ehrenreich exposes the downside of Americas penchant for positive thinking: On a personal level, it leads to self-blame and a morbid preoccupation with stamping out negative thoughts. On a national level, its brought us an era of irrational optimism resulting in disaster. This is Ehrenreich at her provocative bestpoking holes in conventional wisdom and faux science, and ending with a call for existential clarity and courage.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)George Carlin said he was a pessimist when it came to his world view and an optimist when it came to his personal life. I have dealt with depression and anxiety all my life stemming from losing my mom to breast cancer when I was 3. I know how short life can be and how happiness truly is worth pursuing. I also know that there are great injustices in the world that we must fight. My husband had a heart attack last week and here I am on a political message board talking politics and social and economic injustice and yet I am so incredibly grateful I still have the love of my life with me today. We should fight injustice, but life is short. I say find what brings you real joy. It may sound like a cliche but it is so true.
zazen
(2,978 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Bookmarking for later this morning.