Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,666 posts)
Mon May 18, 2015, 09:46 PM May 2015

Cruz warns of ‘mandatory’ same-sex marriage

Cruz warns of ‘mandatory’ same-sex marriage

By Steve Benen at the Maddow Blog

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/cruz-warns-mandatory-same-sex-marriage

"SNIP..................



A few weeks ago, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) condemned Democrats’ “devotion to mandatory gay marriage in all 50 states.” On Friday, as Right Wing Watch’s Brian Tashman noted, Cruz used the phrase again.


Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, the Republican presidential candidate who believes that the gay “jihad” may soon lead to the imprisonment of pastors and the end of free speech, told a right-wing radio host yesterday that the legalization of same-sex marriage represents the greatest threat to religious liberty in the history of the United States. […]

Cruz said that the fights over “religious freedom” laws in Indiana and Arkansas were “heartbreaking” examples of how the Democratic Party has “gotten so extreme and so radical in its devotion to mandatory gay marriage that they’ve decided there’s no room for the religious liberty protected under the First Amendment.”

It remains a deeply odd perspective. For one thing, there’s nothing “extreme” or “radical” about support for marriage equality – it’s already legal in most of the country and a clear majority of Americans already support the idea. If anyone’s taking the “extreme” view in the debate, such as it is, it’s Cruz.

..................SNIP"
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cruz warns of ‘mandatory’ same-sex marriage (Original Post) applegrove May 2015 OP
We should keep a list of Cruz's 'mistakes'. To show a pattern of him terrorizing the base. applegrove May 2015 #1
Cruz is throwing red meat to the batshit insane. eom MohRokTah May 2015 #2
Carnival Cruz throws out one of these assinine statements onecaliberal May 2015 #3
This would be hilarious if so many didn't believe it. Coventina May 2015 #4
Fascinating. Behind the Aegis May 2015 #5
My guess is Cruz is putting the idea out there that applegrove May 2015 #6
Can we at least pick the gay guy we are forced to marry? Warren DeMontague May 2015 #8
Hey Warrrrrreeeennnnn... Behind the Aegis May 2015 #10
Yes, someone who meets the exacting criteria of my value system! Warren DeMontague May 2015 #11
You can have Stipe! Behind the Aegis May 2015 #15
Doogie Howser is WAY too young for me. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #18
"Doogie" is 41. Behind the Aegis May 2015 #19
Ugh. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #20
I know excatly what he is doing. Behind the Aegis May 2015 #9
I think people should be offered the choice, in all things. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #12
I am of two minds with this situation. Behind the Aegis May 2015 #13
Good point. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #14
I get what you are saying. Behind the Aegis May 2015 #16
I hear that. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #17
AH KNEW IT Warren DeMontague May 2015 #7

Coventina

(27,120 posts)
4. This would be hilarious if so many didn't believe it.
Mon May 18, 2015, 10:02 PM
May 2015

Gay jihad?!?!?

"There is no Gay but Gay, and Madonna is the Prophet!"

Now, Adam and Steve, I pronounce you GAY MARRIED!!!

Behind the Aegis

(53,959 posts)
5. Fascinating.
Tue May 19, 2015, 12:51 AM
May 2015

He is slightly, ever so slightly, correct. As a matter of fact, something like this was already posted here at DU and received quite a warm welcome, as it would prevent "heterophobia" and the rampant discrimination against heterosexuals. No, I am not kidding, and only being slightly hyperbolic. It seems some companies, upon a positive SCOTUS ruling for marriage equality, would 'demand' same-sex couples wed if they want to keep their benefits, not taking into consideration, so it would seem, for the political landscape of certain states, which allow for gays to be denied housing, and fired from employment...legally. So, while Cruz is braying about something completely different, there is a sliver, a splinter, if you will, of truth. What a shame when a right-wing nutbar and those on the left can find common ground, even if for different reasons.

applegrove

(118,666 posts)
6. My guess is Cruz is putting the idea out there that
Tue May 19, 2015, 01:19 AM
May 2015

Last edited Tue May 19, 2015, 02:06 PM - Edit history (2)

heterosexual will be forced into a mandatory gay marriage. Ted Cruz is a terrorist. Of course when pressed he will say he did not mean it to be taken that way. But he successfully has put a rape meme in the heads of some in the base. Their senses have been assaulted by the gay people. They will make good little pasties or pawns for Ted Cruz in the months to come. And they will hate the LGBT community even more and even with nobody from the LGBT community having participated in any way. To quote Sarah Mclaughlin, Cruz is 'building a mystery'. Who knows where his narrative will go next i the dance deep within the gut of the GOP base that Cruz leads... but build it he will. And the base will be none the wiser.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. Can we at least pick the gay guy we are forced to marry?
Tue May 19, 2015, 01:32 AM
May 2015

I think I'd have lots to talk about with someone like Michael Stipe.

That guy who plays Sheldon Cooper on that annoyingly middlebrow network TV show with the hokey laugh track, not so much.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
11. Yes, someone who meets the exacting criteria of my value system!
Tue May 19, 2015, 02:57 AM
May 2015

Precisely.

Sorry, though, Stipe's in line first. Take this song, for example: "Maps and Legends". Ostensibly about the folk artist Howard Finster, it manages to touch on the notion of symbolism and language, as well as that ineffable 'what' the symbols represent ("point to&quot also evoking the old Zen line about the finger pointing at the moon; don't concentrate on the finger or you miss the moon.



I think sometimes that's why people here can't relate to each other- it's like trying to give directions to a common destination, but when operating two totally different maps.

Goes without saying that Ted Cruz is operating with a really fucked up map in his oddly bean-shaped head.

But anyway, how many other American Rock and Roll bands write songs that deep? Not many.

Behind the Aegis

(53,959 posts)
15. You can have Stipe!
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:14 AM
May 2015

LOL! I just couldn't resist using that gif!

I find things like what Cruz said both funny and scary. The absurdity is just astounding. What makes me fearful is more than a few, not limited to nutbars, will find what he is saying "truthtopower" and it presents real dangers to people like me.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
18. Doogie Howser is WAY too young for me.
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:24 AM
May 2015

Anyway, with Ted Cruz I have to beliece these are the final yowlings of dinosaurs. I hope.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
20. Ugh.
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:32 AM
May 2015

Thanks a ton.

Okay, you're right, except maybe in the part of my head that thinks it is perpetually 1991.

Behind the Aegis

(53,959 posts)
9. I know excatly what he is doing.
Tue May 19, 2015, 02:01 AM
May 2015

I am gay and have been involved in GLBT activism for years. I know the memes. I was simply pointing out others are doing the same, just not with the same motivation. Both are despicable. The difference? Only one, Cruz, is easily identified as "squirrel shit nutty", the other, is seen as "making everything fair."

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
12. I think people should be offered the choice, in all things.
Tue May 19, 2015, 02:59 AM
May 2015

The current status quo is not the fault of LGBT workers, obviously.

They should be given the opportunity to leave things as they are with their benefits, etc. if that is preferable to them.

Behind the Aegis

(53,959 posts)
13. I am of two minds with this situation.
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:10 AM
May 2015

If they are in a state where GLBT people are on equal grounds legally, then having "two systems" isn't helpful. However, if they are in a state, such as mine, where being outed as gay can cost you your job or home and/or children, then they shouldn't be forced to choose. Marriage equality would be nice, but the reality is GLBT equality isn't limited to marriage, at least not in this country.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
14. Good point.
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:13 AM
May 2015

I guess I was just operating from the spot of "they didn't ask to be put in this position, so it's sort of unfair to force them to make a change unless it's something they want". I mean, people might have reasons to not want to get married now, etc. .. It just seems like the sort of decision an employer shouldn't be making for people.

The "not two systems" thing makes sense, although one figures that if you have benefit structures for hetero married couples AND for LGBT couples in domestic partnerships or otherwise designated, you've already got two systems, presumably working. It wouldn't be all that much more onerous to let people move from one group to the other on their own terms and timeline, rather than employers'.

Behind the Aegis

(53,959 posts)
16. I get what you are saying.
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:21 AM
May 2015

The "not having two systems" is mainly for states where our equality is more or less complete. I wouldn't be opposed to a 'grandfather clause' for GLBT people, even in states where GLBT equality isn't a threat. However, as I said before, states like mine, where other areas are still under threat from anti-GLBT laws, "two systems" would still need to be in place for some. To me, it demonstrates that even though we achieved equality in one area (marriage), the lack of equality in others (employment/housing), threatens our supposed equality in the original area (marriage). What seems to be a wonderful step forward, isn't really a complete step because of other factors.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cruz warns of ‘mandatory’...