Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Mon May 11, 2015, 06:48 PM May 2015

Texas (R): Rape victims shouldn’t receive abortion coverage because their claims aren’t “measurable"

http://www.salon.com/2015/05/07/texas_republican_rape_victims_shouldnt_receive_abortion_coverage_because_their_claims_arent_measurable/

Texas Republican State Sen. Donna Campbell fought an amendment on Wednesday that would allow exceptions for rape and incest victims from a measure that otherwise prohibits all insurance coverage for abortion. Instead, the GOP lawmaker countered the proposal with her own, which would require victims to report their assaults to police in order to receive exemptions, because otherwise the state might be “enabling” perpetrators.

“I’m concerned that we may be unintentionally providing cover for perpetrators of crimes,” Campbell said. She was then challenged by Democrat Kirk Watson, who pressed her to consider the real-life implications of the law and her amendment.

“Would you agree with me that there are instances where a woman could be raped, and because she fears for her life otherwise, would not want to report that to law enforcement officials?” Watson asked. “Can you conceive of that situation?”

Campbell agreed, but continued by identifying the measure as as strictly “an insurance bill.” “Instead of encouraging that hypothetical situation from moving into protection for her by law enforcement, we’re saying, let’s cover that violation with an insurance payment,” she said. “When she gets the abortion…are we empowering the perpetrator, because now out of a coercion…she gets an abortion, and it’s paid for by an insurance company — and then it may happen to her again?”


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas (R): Rape victims shouldn’t receive abortion coverage because their claims aren’t “measurable" (Original Post) KamaAina May 2015 OP
So if someone runs a red light, hits a pedestrian Ilsa May 2015 #1
Even worse. malthaussen May 2015 #7
There are so many things I want to say about this guy that would even make the Rude Pundit blush. madinmaryland May 2015 #2
Believe it or not, the guy is a gal! KamaAina May 2015 #3
Oh jeez. That is just bizarre. madinmaryland May 2015 #4
"are we empowering the perpetrator" by....what? I am stumped here. uppityperson May 2015 #5
Those last couple of sentences hifiguy May 2015 #6
That's DOCTOR Donna Campbell, by the way. Paladin May 2015 #8
Bill Frist's wife, perhaps? KamaAina May 2015 #9

Ilsa

(61,698 posts)
1. So if someone runs a red light, hits a pedestrian
Mon May 11, 2015, 06:52 PM
May 2015

who needs medical care, the driver's insurance shouldn't pay because it enables bad drivers?

malthaussen

(17,217 posts)
7. Even worse.
Mon May 11, 2015, 07:04 PM
May 2015

The pedestrian in your hypothetical would not be in fear of his life. Whereas the woman in Watson's hypothetical is unwilling to report the rape because she fears for her life.

-- Mal

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
3. Believe it or not, the guy is a gal!
Mon May 11, 2015, 06:55 PM
May 2015

Texas Republican State Sen. Donna Campbell fought an amendment on Wednesday that would allow exceptions for rape and incest victims from a measure that otherwise prohibits all insurance coverage for abortion.

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
5. "are we empowering the perpetrator" by....what? I am stumped here.
Mon May 11, 2015, 07:00 PM
May 2015

If she gets raped and gets and abortion, then he won't ever have to suffer the consequences and can just rape her again? I mean, wtf?

He will suffer if she bears his child? Huh. nope, that can't be it.
Women who are pregnant or had a child never get raped? Huh. Nope.
He rapes her, then coerces her into and abortion, which he doesn't have to pay for, and so then can rape her again.

Nope. Still stumped for wtf she is talking about.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
6. Those last couple of sentences
Mon May 11, 2015, 07:01 PM
May 2015

are an exercise in mental gymnastics that defy gravity and logic on a scale heretofore not seen. Even Princess Sparklemoose would be proud of the sheer illogic and incomprehensibility of that derailed train of "thought."

Paladin

(28,276 posts)
8. That's DOCTOR Donna Campbell, by the way.
Mon May 11, 2015, 07:13 PM
May 2015

Besides being a right-wing nut case state senator, she's also an emergency room physician.

Her campaign ads didn't show her going about helping people in an ER; they showed her at a gun range, firing a pistol multiple times.

Just wanted to give you an idea of the sort of person you're dealing with.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas (R): Rape victims s...