General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI paged through the new issue of TIME magazine today looking for Bernie. Guess what?
Their coverage of presidential politics, vis a vis poverty, violence and the war on crime, includes Hilary, O'Malley (who hasn't announced he's running), JEB! And Walker, Carson, Paul and Perry.
No Bernie that I can find anywhere in the magazine.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)means college education is provided by the government, etc.
I am also a Democratic Socialist, I wonder how the people will take the message if they EVER HEAR IT.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)They are exactly on schedule with my predicitons.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Apparently, a straightforward reporting of events is right out.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)He will get far less coverage than Howard Dean did. Dean wasn't a threat...Bernie is.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)By Jim Naureckas
FAIR, May 6, 2015
In the New York Times presentation, only Republicans have choices.
SNIP...
So why treat the presidential contest as though theres a race for the Republican spot, while Democrats only get to express their feelings about their one predetermined choice?
Actually, if youre a real polling nerd, and you click on the link to the Full New York Times/CBS News Poll, you find that the Times (and CBS) actually did ask voters about other Democratic candidatesbut the Times chose not to share those results with readers in any kind of reader-friendly form.
In case youre curious, the percentage of Democrats who say they would consider voting for Sanders has risen from 14 percent in February to 23 percent nowbut 61 percent say they havent heard enough to be able to say which is, of course, in part a function of journalists treating next years Democratic contest as a foregone conclusion.
If the New York Times were to say that theyre treating the 2016 Democratic race as a foregone conclusion because it is a foregone conclusion, I would point them to Gallups October 2007 roundup of what that election cycles year-before-the-election polling showed:
Gallups 2007 national presidential polling strongly points to Clinton winning the 2008 Democratic nomination. Barring something unusual or otherwise unexpected, she is well positioned for the 2008 Democratic primaries.
SNIP...
Clintons nomination seems almost inevitable, Gallup concludedthough it added that under extreme circumstances, a strong Democratic candidate can blow a big lead. Apparently 2008s circumstances turned out to be extreme.
CONTINUED...
http://fair.org/home/nyt-presents-2016-race-as-gop-candidates-vs-hillary-clinton/
MADem
(135,425 posts)TIME is a GOP fishwrap, but they're covering Senator Sanders--in fact, they gave him a BYLINE yesterday:
http://time.com/3850839/bernie-sanders-usa-patriot-act/
IDEAS POLITICS
Bernie Sanders: Its Time To End Orwellian Surveillance of Every American
Sen. Bernie Sanders May 7, 2015
I voted against the Patriot Act every time, and it still needs major reform.
I welcome a federal appeals court ruling that the National Security Agency does not have the legal authority to collect and store data on all U.S. telephone calls. Now Congress should rewrite the expiring eavesdropping provision in the so-called USA Patriot Act and include strong new limits to protect the privacy and civil liberties of the American people.
Let me be clear: We must do everything we can to protect our country from the serious potential of another terrorist attack. We can and must do so, however, in a way that also protects the constitutional rights of the American people and maintains our free society.
Do we really want to live in a country where the NSA gathers data on virtually every single phone call in the United Statesincluding as many as 5 billion cellphone records per day? I dont. Do we really want our government to collect our emails, see our text messages, know everyones Internet browsing history, monitor bank and credit card transactions, keep tabs on peoples social networks? I dont.
Unfortunately, this sort of Orwellian surveillance, conducted under provisions of the Patriot Act, invades the privacy of millions of law-abiding Americans.....
I think criticism is fair when it's deserved, but the GOP - influenced media, like CNN and TIME and others, HAVE been covering this dark horse candidate--far more than they have done in the past.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)To call them on their bias. They replied that they had covered him last week when he announced, oh and had him on for half an hour LAST Summer....
Complete tweet thread is here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026641641
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)and for a few years after. By chance, my daughter brought a copy home last week because it had an article about Cuba. The magazine is pathetic, like most American "journalism."
nikto
(3,284 posts)You can bet righty and Korporate think-tanks are working late-hours on the problem as you read this.
Once they figure out how to attack him, the viciousness and smears will be relentless.
But for now, ignoring him will have to do.
captainarizona
(363 posts)No free media for bernie so you and bernie will have to be creative and do media guerrilla theater. Here is start go to where central american children are being jailed and have bernie and his supporters block the streets around it. Hold black lives matter rallys in red state large cities.