General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaryland cuts tolls on Bay Bridge, ICC and other roadways
Congratulations Maryland. Now you can have roads just like Pennsylvania and Virginia.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/hogan-slashes-tolls-in-maryland/2015/05/07/096cd64e-f4d0-11e4-bcc4-e8141e5eb0c9_story.html
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)This is good for the poor and working class who have to go back and forth everyday to work in Annapolis because housing is affordable on the Eastern shore. This is really positive.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)This was done with zero public input or studies on economic impact. There is no plan for how to deal with the reduced revenue. This is pure political pandering. Four years ago the same agency said they had to raise tolls in order to maintain the bridges properly. What happened? It got cheaper to maintain bridges? I don't think so. Those working class commuters eventually will be sitting in traffic longer at the bridge as lanes are closed more because of lack of preventive maintenance and fewer workers to get the job done at night when traffic is light. Foolish move driven by politics rather than sound economics. Besides, the rates dropped for trucks and commercial vehicles also, which break up the road surface more. So now Maryland taxpayers are subsidizing commercial truck traffic on our bridges. Nice job, Governor Hogan.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)I see the republicans love it though.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I see some just have to bash the poor and working class who are my priority. I live in Maryland so I know most about this incredibly state then those of another state. We are the number 1 state in the country.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)I live in Maryland too and did not vote for this teabagger.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)But you seem to not want to give poor and working class a break on tolls. I say lower the tolls and raise property taxes. And yes I am a homeowner who pays 8 grand a year but willing to raise my property taxes to ensure the poor get a break. I live in Arnold by the way.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Besides, as I pointed out, everyone is getting a huge break on tolls - cars, light trucks, commercial trucks. That doesn't just help the poor. You want to help daily commuters, set up some kind of rebate system, don't just lower the rates for everyone.
onenote
(42,714 posts)But he didn't. In fact, he claims that he's going to make up for the lost revenue by cutting personnel etc. from the Department of Transportation.
Good luck with that approach to maintaining quality roads and bridges.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)And pay for them with the bridge tolls, as Golden Gate Transit from Marin and Sonoma to SF does.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Queen Anne's, the county closest to the Bay Bridge, has less than 50,000 people. Stevensville, at the east end of the bridge, has less than 6,000. Neighboring counties are even smaller.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Certainly not from the really affordable parts of the ES such as Dorchester County and Somerset County, for example.
Most of the folks in Queen Anne's who might be commuting can well afford the toll. Median household income is $87,000 in Queene Anne's (compared to $74,000 for the state, $46,000 in Dorchester, $38,000 in Somerset) and I suspect that most of the commuters are going to fairly high paid jobs in Annapolis or DC.
Besides, if you are commuting from the ES to Annapolis or DC, the bridge toll, even at $6 (and most commuters would pay the EZ Pass rate of $5.40) would not be a very large part of your daily RT commute costs. If you can afford to commute by private car, you can afford the toll. A much more affordable venue would be the MTA subsidized commuter bus service between Kent Island and DC (I believe it runs 6 days a week). Last I looked it was $5 one way and $170 for a monthly pass.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)As for the lost revenue, it's going to be made up by attrition at MDOT, or at least that's what was on the radio yesterday.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Reality is this could very well tank the bond rating, making it very expensive to sell bonds to replace the Rte 301 bridge in Charles County in 2020. If you have ever been on that bridge you will know why it needs to be replaced.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)All but two members of the board were appointed by Gov. O'Malley, so they could have stopped the reductions, had they wanted to.
$54 million annually is ~2% of the Maryland transportation budget and ~9% of the annual toll revenue; if that tanks the bond rating (which the MdTA stated was not an issue at all), then they have much bigger problems.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Yes, and they serve 4 year terms, meaning all of them could be up for reappointment by Hogan. 4 years ago they raised the tolls and analysts say it was necessary to pay for bonds issued during the Ehrlich administration, according to the Baltimore Sun. http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-toll-decrease-20150506-story.html
This was strictly a political decision so what the board says can be pretty much discounted.
Percent of budget is not the issue, ability to meet obligations is. Of course in the short term it will not make much of a difference. In fact, the crunch could come after Hogan is no longer governor. But he gets to say he lowered tolls. Good for him. Not so good for Maryland.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)So 6 of 8 voted to decrease the tolls so that they could keep their jobs, and as such, they can't be trusted to tell the truth. And if it's nothing more than a political issue, then I would have thought that the members appointed by a Democrat would want to hand the Republican governor a defeat.
I'm of the opinion that the doomsayers are way overreacting to this.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)right before the big recession hit. There are a couple of sizable developments of housing.
Many of my wife's relatives live over there.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Maryland is so toll-heavy that I spend $24 just in this state on my way to and from visiting relatives in New Jersey. Plus the Delaware tolls on top of that.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)on our state. I wonder how their state fair in comparison to Maryland. Not good I predict. Plus this is good for poor and working class and yet they still bash. Stunning!
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)No one is bashing the poor. This does not help the poor if it means they pay higher income taxes, sales taxes, gas taxes and rents. The money has to come from somewhere to keep up the bridges.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Too bad poster would not be more specific.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Even at 6 bucks round trip, the Bay Bridge was cheap compared to other toll bridges.
At $2.50 for EZ pass holders round trip, the Bay Bridge will be cheaper than it was in 1952 when the bridge opened as a single two lane span ($2.80). When the average household income was less than $4000 a year and gas was about 20 cents a gallon.
How is any of this fair to Maryland taxpayers, who will have to come up with the money to maintain and replace bridges? Why should we subsidize your trip to New Jersey?
kwassa
(23,340 posts)I can ride I-95 through Pennsylvania and I- 295 through New Jersey and pay no tolls at all.
Infrastructure is a public good that helps everyone. Take it out of taxes, the way it used to be done.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Tolls help to make up for some of that inefficiency. You want to be able to use your car rather than go on Amtrak? Fine, but we are going to charge you part of the extra cost of that with tolls.
Roads have never been financed only from general revenues. Tolls were used from the beginning, particularly for bridges. After the advent cars and trucks, fuel taxes and vehicle registration fees were used. Also heavy long distance trucks pay road taxes in each state.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)the beautiful new freeway between I 270 and I-95. Very underused. The same with toll express lanes in Virginia.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)I think the jury is still out on that one. Personally I would rather see toll lanes than HOV lanes because HOV is too difficult to enforce and getting a break for having one passenger is sort of a joke.
onenote
(42,714 posts)You must be very old indeed.
Toll roads have been around since the 18th Century.
LibertyLover
(4,788 posts)the cash toll on the Bay Bridge is the only cash toll that is going down - all others like at the Key Bridge and Harbor Tunnel remain the same. It's E-Z Pass users that are getting the biggest break - Bay Bridge E-Z pass toll down to $2.50 from $5.70 and 15-25% E-Z Pass toll reductions at other venues. They also removed the monthly fee on E-Z pass because they are trying to make up for the toll reductions in volume of new E-Z pass users. Hogan is an idiot. Supposedly he comes from the town I live in - Edgewater. After the election, he and his wife were trying to decide if they should sell their home because they'd be in the Governor's Mansion in Annapolis. I think they decided to keep it because someone reminded them that even if he was reelected in 4 years, a truly horrifying prospect in my book, that we have term limits for governors and he could only serve 2 terms.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Here in the panhandle of Florida we have dozens of major bridges. Only one in the surrounding 4 counties is a toll bridge.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)There are all kinds of bridges. Comparing them is apples and oranges.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)And I think they charge $1.50 cash, $1.25 SunPass.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)No toll.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)The Chesapeake Bay Bridge is on a major artery for commuters, tourism, and commerce.
Maintenance work is being done on it virtually all of the time.