General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama stands by the term 'thugs,' White House says
President Obama doesn't regret using the term "thug" in describing the violent rioters in Baltimore this week, spokesman Josh Earnest said Wednesday."Whether it's arson or, you know, the looting of a liquor store ... those were thuggish acts," Earnest said.
In discussing the riots Tuesday, Obama assailed the "criminals and thugs who tore up the place," and described them as a distraction from the real issues of police brutality.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2015/04/29/obama-white-house-baltimore-stephanie-rawlings-blake/26585143/
Response to derby378 (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)from India obviously vs the Germanic Vandals
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)...but the article clearly indicates that the Persians have reached Thermopylae, and the linguistics battle has been joined.
ann---
(1,933 posts)Rioters who steal and set fire to the property of innocent
people are nothing less than "thugs" - regardless of their
color.
I'm sure he (and I) would call white or other rioters who did
this by the same name - they are thugs - period.
frylock
(34,825 posts)perhaps you can assist by providing such evidence?
ann---
(1,933 posts)How do you know for sure that all the thugs in Baltimore who are
looting and vandalizing property does not include whites?
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Obama is playing to that bullshit center again.
Thugs is the new N word and that is that.
Use it at your own peril
frylock
(34,825 posts)really good interview that is well worth listening to.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026598453#post14
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I use thug all the time to describe any criminal, no matter who it is.
Thugs are criminals who prey on innocent people.
840high
(17,196 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,324 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)Hole-in-freakin'-one.
Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #5)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
ann---
(1,933 posts)the thugs in Baltimore (or anywhere) not thugs.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 30, 2015, 03:32 PM - Edit history (1)
What if Bush had said it was okay to use the word thug? Would you be posting it here?
I'm trying to be honest and respectful, but this is getting ridiculous.
It's this:
Did thug used to mean a black youth? No, and I used to use it...all the time.
Has thug been co-opted by certain members of the media and voting public, not to mention politicians, to describe young black men? Hell yes. Even a blind man can see that.
JI7
(89,276 posts)One or the other . Like that mother getting her kid . She is either hero or abusive.
I refer to George Zimmerman as thug.
But when especially right wingers use it in cases of any young black male we know what they are trying to say.
derby378
(30,252 posts)Once in a while, someone will coin a new word or a new definition for an existing word. I've been there. Either it will fade into apocrypha or it will become fairly standard usage. But that's why our language has gatekeepers. Be glad we're not French.
I refuse to give racists the power to "co-opt" a word for their own nefarious purposes. I will not give them credit no matter how hard they try. To do so would be to admit that they are winning, and that cannot happen.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and neologisms (hint this is one) usually take anywhere from 5 to 10 years to make it to the official dictionary. Look it up in urban dictionaries first.
Second hint, language evolves, why Gay no longer stands for happy, even though it is still in the dictionary.
derby378
(30,252 posts)The new definition of gay evolved organically over a couple of decades, as documented in the writings of Gertrude Stein and Noel Erskine as well as movies featuring Cary Grant. What you're seeing with thug is not so much an organic evolution as it is an attempt at engineering a new definition and retrofitting it into common usage.
Sure, people objected to the "new" definition of gay, but it had been percolating on the street as far back as the 1890s. This attempt at a neologism, however, doesn't appear to have the same authenticity - it could be argued that it looks forced.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)that it is the new nigger... and I hear it regularly from many of the people in the neighborhood, who exactly am I to question that?
Moreover, while Fox started the use with Trayvon Martin this might go all the way back to 2005. That is one decade, organic and all.
Logical
(22,457 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)SM asked, and I tried to answer. No sweat, so please chill.
Butterbean
(1,014 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Or is that different?
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)and now we're all supposed to jump on that bandwagon. I refuse to go there.
840high
(17,196 posts)at least two of us.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)If Obama had said differently, would you be asking the same question?
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)That's not who I am.
SamKnause
(13,110 posts)is better suited to describe the police and their actions.
Murderous thugs.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Maybe better than for most of the other behavior it is used for.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)for some around here (not you), then so be it
BKH70041
(961 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)msongs
(67,459 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)I think you just won the internets today. Well played.
Logical
(22,457 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)He considers the tens of millions of vicious racists, Americans too
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)We all know the real atrocity is asking white people to slightly alter their vocabularies.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Thug has no color. A group of menacing bullies, male or female.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Response to frylock (Reply #31)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
frylock
(34,825 posts)I'm talking about the real world. Do a google of the word "thug". Report back with any findings of white people being referred to as such.
Response to frylock (Reply #34)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
frylock
(34,825 posts)I'm guessing you never bothered, knowing that it was a fruitless endeavor.
Response to frylock (Reply #36)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
frylock
(34,825 posts)not used so much to describe white revelers of hockey championships that torch police cars.
Response to frylock (Reply #43)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
frylock
(34,825 posts)I think you knew what I meant, but thanks for playing.
Logical
(22,457 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)and you know what? if you want to use the word, then fucking knock yourself out. just know that you're in the company of some fine, outstanding racist mutherfuckers. Kirk out.
Logical
(22,457 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)I get proven wrong on many occasions. I use it as a learning experience. I'm learning a lot today.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)he didn't misspeak - clearly he's standing by the use of the word.
frylock
(34,825 posts)or some such bullshit. IDK what the fuck his mindset is. Maybe he thinks the conservatives will invite him over to the cool table in the lunchroom or something.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)You really don't like having your error shown to you, do you?
frylock
(34,825 posts)Obama lives in a fucking bubble. It was a poor choice of words. People will defend it because they defend EVERYTHING Obama says or does, and take any perceived slight as a personal attack.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/video-professional-boxer-downs-thugs-protect-wife-article-1.2018925
http://www.delcotimes.com/general-news/20141005/thugs-pa-ironworkers-case-details-arsons-intimidation
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11408547/Jubilant-thugs-jump-for-joy-after-crocodile-tears-convince-judge-of-remorse.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2744724/Incredible-moment-tuxedo-wearing-great-grandfather-fought-THREE-crowbar-wielding-thugs-returned-home-house-burgled.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/video-romanian-thugs-brutally-spin-elderly-woman-article-1.1746847
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/racist-thugs-broke-doormans-leg-4468644
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2258964/Anti-English-assault-victim-large-section-skull-removed-horrific-street-attack-thugs-Cardiff.html
http://www.croydonguardian.co.uk/news/11830521.Vicious_Polish_thugs__hiding_in_Croydon___Have_you_seen_them_/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jailed-vile-thugs-who-beat-5388627
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/471796/VIDEO-Chilling-moment-Ukraine-thugs-beat-up-pro-Russia-supporter-and-throw-him-in-river
frylock
(34,825 posts)carry on with the use of the word, folks.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)everyone can see. it. in plain view. and beth page.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)He's changed his mind on other issues, hopefully he'll come around on this one.
Quayblue
(1,045 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,970 posts)...we have too many naughty words.
Iris
(15,671 posts)Trillo
(9,154 posts)WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Skittles
(153,212 posts)but we just need to "look forward" when people start senseless wars based on lies
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)"Whether it's arson or, you know, the looting of a liquor store ... those were thuggish acts," Earnest said.
"Whether it's arson or, you know, the looting of a liquor store ... those were criminal acts," Earnest should have said.
What the police did was the real thuggery.
Boggles the mind