Do the repukes have "new" information on Benghazi? Or will they just rehash what has already

[CTyankee]

been gone over?

Another question: where do the repukes get the idea that the American voters are INTERESTED in hearing about Benghazi?

[truebluegreen]

1. 'Course not; yes; and "in their fever dreams." nt

[giftedgirl77]

2. No, yes & out of there ass?

[louis-t]

3. They still have "a lot of questions".

[CTyankee]

4. I wonder about those "questions"...

My guess is that if they keep throwing this shit some of it will stick to HRC...but if those "questions" are simply a rehash then the coverage they get will reveal nothing new, nothing different and folks will start getting suspicious of the GOP, not Hillary...

At least, that is my prediction and my hope...

[louis-t]

8. They have no new questions. That's just an excuse

to keep the base riled through 2016.

[CTyankee]

9. the problem is that they don't get anywhere with this except with their small base.

The general public doesn't care. It's fine to roil your base every now and again but you aren't making any progress with the vast majority of voters...

[louis-t]

10. And they are spending buttloads of money to do it.

Taxpayer money.

[Thinkingabout]

5. They will be reading the Clinton Cash looking for information.

[CTyankee]

7. well, seeing the grilling that Schweizer guy is getting even in the MSM, it's not going

so well...Stephanopoulos was trying to nail him down on something and he was vague. It was obvious that he got nuthin'. That book is not going over well...

[hobbit709]

6. Three guesses: First two don't count.

[kentuck]

11. It fits their ad campaign against Hillary in their battle for the White House.

"What difference does it make at this day and time!" paraphrasing Hillary at hearing. It is meant to be a personal, unflattering attack ad.

[AgingAmerican]

12. Their whole premise is made up

There was never any 'information' to begin with.