General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"unelectable"
Last edited Wed Apr 29, 2015, 01:15 PM - Edit history (1)
It is a tried and true tactic to repeat this about a candidate until they are saddled with the "unelectable" label.
It is very effective. Before you know it, the meme is being repeated over, and over, and cited as 'conventional wisdom'.
Why would we do this to a candidate who is only running to represent our best interests?
I'll have to admit, I am a bit suspicious of those who keep repeating this about Bernie Sanders like a mantra. What's the deal?
I am more specifically thinking of those who seem so eager to make sure they repeat this meme wherever others are expressing enthusiasm.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)What's the deal?
I mean... cough... strawman.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)That is the DU mantra. The projection on DU is astounding sometimes.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)speaking pragmatically, Bernie has almost no chance of getting the nomination.
Which isn't quite the same as saying "unelectable" since that term implies not enough of voting public will pull the lever for him.
The chance of the Democratic party getting behind Sanders is very slim. I erred in saying zero earlier. But it isn't likely.
But it is an exciting development. He's going to make things move a bit to the left and that is a great thing.
IMO, Sanders deserves support for the benefits he brings to the primary process.
Pretty sure I'll send him a small amount.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Many here are unable to objectively look at things and come to realistic conclusions that conflict with what they want or feel. And my comments can apply equally to Hillary as well, forget that Hillary is a woman and then decide if she is still a great candidate.
The average of age a President is 55 upon taking office the first time, you can sort the link by the age they were when they assumed office: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_age
and most of them were either the vice president or a Governor prior to being President
And just because you and others here on DU like/love Bernie Sanders or Hillary does not mean it the rest of the country will, nor does it mean they think they are voting against their best interests by not voting for Bernie or Hillary.
My more cynical view is that the Democratic Party is NOT going to allow some Senator from Vermont, who has spent his entire career as an independent, take the Democratic nomination from someone in the Democratic party who has put their time in working up through the political ranks of the Party
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)It's more then 14 months until the Democratic National Convention at which the nominee will be choosen. A lot can happen between now and then.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)the glass ceiling, breathing fresh air. we see we can when, having busted the glass seeing.
sanders is another opportunity. i think we are more comfortable with that now. especially seeing how clinton will be there if not sanders. at this point. clinton being another that does not fall under historical and whatever else.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)and upset. I also think you are allowing yourself to be at least partially blinded by what you want to happen as opposed as to what is likely to happen.
Again it is more then 14 months to the national convention and just over 18 months to the election, so a lot can happen between now and those two dates.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)what is this upset? you try to give me. i see win win win all the way around. but, i am way ahead of that ole 8 ball.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)nor have I been posting anything in favor of a specific person.
The OP asked a question and I gave him what I think was an accurate answer as to why some candidates are viewed as unelectable
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)nenagh
(1,925 posts)I was watching the Ed Show when Ed was talking to Bernie Sanders about Fast Tracking the TPP...
Bernie said, to the best of his knowledge, that the TPP/ Fast Track, had not been mentioned on CNN, ABC, CBS etc.
That Ed was practically the only voice to discuss the issue..
Then the show cut away to Pres Obama live...criticizing MSNBC, Ed essentially, for his negativity about the TPP.
I'm so relieved and thankful that Bernie's decision to run for Pres... will mean that as he speaks out about the TPP..that the MSM will be forced into some discussion about it..
G_j
(40,367 posts)is a moment of truth. I am elated also.
nenagh
(1,925 posts)Thank you
boston bean
(36,223 posts)Answer: MANY.
So, take it for what its worth.
G_j
(40,367 posts)although quite a stretch, as her numbers say otherwise.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)book.
that is what many of us have been addressing the last couple weeks.
i agree. so, i have chosen to take action, and start proving the "unelectable" is only if we create that.
brooklynite
(94,670 posts)Thanks for letting us know...
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)MineralMan
(146,324 posts)A lot of people have been involved in presidential campaigns over the years. They have lots of experience in understanding how voters behave. I'm one of them, and have been active in those campaigns since 1960, when I was just a sophomore in high school. I follow every election closely, and participate in campaigns actively.
Bernie Sanders has a very difficult road ahead of him, even to get the Democratic nomination. You'd be amazed at how many people have never heard his name, and that will be true throughout the campaign. At least half the population couldn't tell you who the current VP is. And then, there's campaign funding. Overcoming the inertia of voters is very, very expensive. How much money can Sanders raise for a primary campaign? I don't know, but it will make a huge difference.
We'll know what his chances are of getting the Democratic nomination on Super Tuesday in 2016. Unless he is very close in primary results to Hillary Clinton, he won't have much choice except to drop out of the race. The same is true of the other candidates who enter the primary race. It's going to be up to his supporters to help him, and the time to start is right now.
Is Senator Sanders electable? Nobody knows the answer to that, but we will know, long before the nominating convention. If you want Sanders on the ballot in November, there's a lot of work to do to make him electable. Right now, he's not, because Hillary Clinton has a huge lead in current polling. That will have to change drastically.
Start the campaign now, if you want him to win. Campaign very, very hard. It's going to be a tough pull.
It's up to us. I am just wishing people will be sensitive to the fact that saying he has "zero chances" etc. potentially discourages people from even trying. A big plus for Sanders is that the people who do know him are incredibly enthusiastic and motivated. Enthusiasm can not be overestimated as a factor. Obama was not that well known either, but he somehow managed to harness a huge reservoir of enthusiasm. As a supporter, I want to push back against absolutist statements that I've seen a lot of: "He has zero chances". For one thing, I don't believe that. It will be a tough pull for certain, but not impossible. It's up to the people.
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)Frankly, I wouldn't characterize his chances at all. If his enthusiastic supporters can win him a primary or two, his chances will improve. Lots of people were enthusiastic about Dennis Kucinich, too, but he never managed to win even a single primary. That should be job one for Sanders supporters. He will desperately need an early primary win. Failing that, his campaign will be short.
I'm not in an early primary state. Our precinct caucuses in MN are on Super Tuesday in 2016. I'll caucus for Sanders, but Minnesota will almost certainly go for Clinton in the caucuses on March 1. She's very popular here. The Iowa caucuses are going to be important, because they will have an impact on campaign financing, as they always do.
Sanders needs a primary win. Not a second-place finish with a wide margin. That won't help. He needs to win an early primary. So, that's where efforts need to go.
that is the kind of constructive input that makes DU worthwhile.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Republicans present a clear and present danger.
brooklynite
(94,670 posts)And this this is a political blog where issues like electability get discussed?
And people who don't like Hillary Clinton say the same thing?
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)the left of Lieberman is suggested as a presidential candidate.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)A rumpled-looking self-described Democratic-Socialist with a very noticeable Brooklyn accent just ain't gonna win a national election.
It's not fair, it's not right, and I'm afraid it's completely true.
G_j
(40,367 posts)I wouldn't be so sure that they aren't.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)straight talk, no bullshit, and authentic focus on real folks.
randome
(34,845 posts)If the moment changes, the pendulum swings, the stars align, our views will likely change as well.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Precision and concision. That's the game.[/center][/font][hr]
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Gothmog
(145,475 posts)I do not see Bernie being able to do this
99Forever
(14,524 posts)It comes basically from two kinds of people. Tools and fools.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The Old Testament Prophets of DU are much more confident with themselves than anyone else really is.
A bumper-sticker of one-dimensional wisdom here, a chicken mcnugget oracle there, and before we know it, Madame Marie begins falling for her own auguries.
No mountain is climbable until someone climbs it, no river is swimmable until someone swims it.