Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,367 posts)
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:13 AM Apr 2015

"unelectable"

Last edited Wed Apr 29, 2015, 01:15 PM - Edit history (1)

It is a tried and true tactic to repeat this about a candidate until they are saddled with the "unelectable" label.
It is very effective. Before you know it, the meme is being repeated over, and over, and cited as 'conventional wisdom'.
Why would we do this to a candidate who is only running to represent our best interests?
I'll have to admit, I am a bit suspicious of those who keep repeating this about Bernie Sanders like a mantra. What's the deal?
I am more specifically thinking of those who seem so eager to make sure they repeat this meme wherever others are expressing enthusiasm.



36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"unelectable" (Original Post) G_j Apr 2015 OP
That descriptor is used much more often about Hillary on DU. onehandle Apr 2015 #1
Yup. "If we nominate Hillary we lose, if we nominate Bernie we win". JaneyVee Apr 2015 #10
weird, I haven't encountered that mantra once Voice for Peace Apr 2015 #31
Well, I know the word "pragmatic" isn't popular for many on DU. However, KittyWampus Apr 2015 #2
It's people looking at historical trends and reality Lurks Often Apr 2015 #3
ya. we could have looked at historical trends and reality in electing a black man, or a woman. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #9
There are always outliers, but historical trends are often useful Lurks Often Apr 2015 #14
here is how i see our opportunity. we busted the glass ceiling. we are comfortable having busted seabeyond Apr 2015 #15
Shrug, we'll find out soon enough, but I think you are going to be disappointed Lurks Often Apr 2015 #23
hey... if you cannot even consider it, it isnt gonna happen. what is this... disappointed? seabeyond Apr 2015 #26
I have no problem with Bernie or Hillary or anyone else contending for the nomination Lurks Often Apr 2015 #32
yes. i agree. and i disagreed with your presentation and stated why. that is all. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #33
Ok Lurks Often Apr 2015 #35
Slightly OT, but, nenagh Apr 2015 #4
every minute of air time Bernie gets G_j Apr 2015 #5
"a moment of truth"...I will think of that often... nenagh Apr 2015 #13
You know how many people on this website have claimed Hillary unelectable? boston bean Apr 2015 #6
it's the same thing G_j Apr 2015 #12
anyone that works at contaminating a candidate with whatever coating of negative, is suspect in my seabeyond Apr 2015 #7
IMPORTANT NEW DU RULE: Only POSITIVE comments about a candidate are acceptable brooklynite Apr 2015 #22
you are just being silly, right? seabeyond Apr 2015 #25
Well, some people think he is unelectable. MineralMan Apr 2015 #8
I agree G_j Apr 2015 #16
I wouldn't say that his chances are zero. MineralMan Apr 2015 #17
thanks G_j Apr 2015 #20
I will gladly support the Democratic nominee. JaneyVee Apr 2015 #11
You DO realize that this discussion is ONLY happening among a bunch of bloggers here? brooklynite Apr 2015 #18
the one that annoys me is the bringing up of the Dukakis or Mondale campaigns whenever anybody to m-lekktor Apr 2015 #19
I wish it weren't so, but it is. Adrahil Apr 2015 #21
How do we know that people aren't ready for a bold straight talker with a Brooklyn accent? G_j Apr 2015 #27
that's how I see it as well. Voice for Peace Apr 2015 #30
Most of us are on the same side. 'Unelectable' simply refers to the view of the moment. randome Apr 2015 #24
I don't think he's unelectable. Voice for Peace Apr 2015 #28
To win the 2016 election, the Democratic nominee will need to raise at least one billion dollars Gothmog Apr 2015 #29
IMNSHO 99Forever Apr 2015 #34
The Old Testament Prophets of DU are much more confident with themselves than anyone else really is LanternWaste Apr 2015 #36

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
1. That descriptor is used much more often about Hillary on DU.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:19 AM
Apr 2015

What's the deal?

I mean... cough... strawman.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
10. Yup. "If we nominate Hillary we lose, if we nominate Bernie we win".
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:06 PM
Apr 2015

That is the DU mantra. The projection on DU is astounding sometimes.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
2. Well, I know the word "pragmatic" isn't popular for many on DU. However,
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:23 AM
Apr 2015

speaking pragmatically, Bernie has almost no chance of getting the nomination.

Which isn't quite the same as saying "unelectable" since that term implies not enough of voting public will pull the lever for him.

The chance of the Democratic party getting behind Sanders is very slim. I erred in saying zero earlier. But it isn't likely.

But it is an exciting development. He's going to make things move a bit to the left and that is a great thing.

IMO, Sanders deserves support for the benefits he brings to the primary process.

Pretty sure I'll send him a small amount.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
3. It's people looking at historical trends and reality
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:36 AM
Apr 2015

Many here are unable to objectively look at things and come to realistic conclusions that conflict with what they want or feel. And my comments can apply equally to Hillary as well, forget that Hillary is a woman and then decide if she is still a great candidate.

The average of age a President is 55 upon taking office the first time, you can sort the link by the age they were when they assumed office: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_age

and most of them were either the vice president or a Governor prior to being President

And just because you and others here on DU like/love Bernie Sanders or Hillary does not mean it the rest of the country will, nor does it mean they think they are voting against their best interests by not voting for Bernie or Hillary.

My more cynical view is that the Democratic Party is NOT going to allow some Senator from Vermont, who has spent his entire career as an independent, take the Democratic nomination from someone in the Democratic party who has put their time in working up through the political ranks of the Party

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
9. ya. we could have looked at historical trends and reality in electing a black man, or a woman. nt
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:05 PM
Apr 2015
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
14. There are always outliers, but historical trends are often useful
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:32 PM
Apr 2015

It's more then 14 months until the Democratic National Convention at which the nominee will be choosen. A lot can happen between now and then.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
15. here is how i see our opportunity. we busted the glass ceiling. we are comfortable having busted
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:42 PM
Apr 2015

the glass ceiling, breathing fresh air. we see we can when, having busted the glass seeing.

sanders is another opportunity. i think we are more comfortable with that now. especially seeing how clinton will be there if not sanders. at this point. clinton being another that does not fall under historical and whatever else.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
23. Shrug, we'll find out soon enough, but I think you are going to be disappointed
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:57 PM
Apr 2015

and upset. I also think you are allowing yourself to be at least partially blinded by what you want to happen as opposed as to what is likely to happen.

Again it is more then 14 months to the national convention and just over 18 months to the election, so a lot can happen between now and those two dates.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
26. hey... if you cannot even consider it, it isnt gonna happen. what is this... disappointed?
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 01:01 PM
Apr 2015

what is this upset? you try to give me. i see win win win all the way around. but, i am way ahead of that ole 8 ball.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
32. I have no problem with Bernie or Hillary or anyone else contending for the nomination
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 01:07 PM
Apr 2015

nor have I been posting anything in favor of a specific person.

The OP asked a question and I gave him what I think was an accurate answer as to why some candidates are viewed as unelectable

nenagh

(1,925 posts)
4. Slightly OT, but,
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:37 AM
Apr 2015

I was watching the Ed Show when Ed was talking to Bernie Sanders about Fast Tracking the TPP...

Bernie said, to the best of his knowledge, that the TPP/ Fast Track, had not been mentioned on CNN, ABC, CBS etc.

That Ed was practically the only voice to discuss the issue..

Then the show cut away to Pres Obama live...criticizing MSNBC, Ed essentially, for his negativity about the TPP.

I'm so relieved and thankful that Bernie's decision to run for Pres... will mean that as he speaks out about the TPP..that the MSM will be forced into some discussion about it..



boston bean

(36,223 posts)
6. You know how many people on this website have claimed Hillary unelectable?
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:03 PM
Apr 2015

Answer: MANY.

So, take it for what its worth.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
7. anyone that works at contaminating a candidate with whatever coating of negative, is suspect in my
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:03 PM
Apr 2015

book.

that is what many of us have been addressing the last couple weeks.

i agree. so, i have chosen to take action, and start proving the "unelectable" is only if we create that.

brooklynite

(94,670 posts)
22. IMPORTANT NEW DU RULE: Only POSITIVE comments about a candidate are acceptable
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:57 PM
Apr 2015

Thanks for letting us know...

MineralMan

(146,324 posts)
8. Well, some people think he is unelectable.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:04 PM
Apr 2015

A lot of people have been involved in presidential campaigns over the years. They have lots of experience in understanding how voters behave. I'm one of them, and have been active in those campaigns since 1960, when I was just a sophomore in high school. I follow every election closely, and participate in campaigns actively.

Bernie Sanders has a very difficult road ahead of him, even to get the Democratic nomination. You'd be amazed at how many people have never heard his name, and that will be true throughout the campaign. At least half the population couldn't tell you who the current VP is. And then, there's campaign funding. Overcoming the inertia of voters is very, very expensive. How much money can Sanders raise for a primary campaign? I don't know, but it will make a huge difference.

We'll know what his chances are of getting the Democratic nomination on Super Tuesday in 2016. Unless he is very close in primary results to Hillary Clinton, he won't have much choice except to drop out of the race. The same is true of the other candidates who enter the primary race. It's going to be up to his supporters to help him, and the time to start is right now.

Is Senator Sanders electable? Nobody knows the answer to that, but we will know, long before the nominating convention. If you want Sanders on the ballot in November, there's a lot of work to do to make him electable. Right now, he's not, because Hillary Clinton has a huge lead in current polling. That will have to change drastically.

Start the campaign now, if you want him to win. Campaign very, very hard. It's going to be a tough pull.

G_j

(40,367 posts)
16. I agree
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:45 PM
Apr 2015

It's up to us. I am just wishing people will be sensitive to the fact that saying he has "zero chances" etc. potentially discourages people from even trying. A big plus for Sanders is that the people who do know him are incredibly enthusiastic and motivated. Enthusiasm can not be overestimated as a factor. Obama was not that well known either, but he somehow managed to harness a huge reservoir of enthusiasm. As a supporter, I want to push back against absolutist statements that I've seen a lot of: "He has zero chances". For one thing, I don't believe that. It will be a tough pull for certain, but not impossible. It's up to the people.

MineralMan

(146,324 posts)
17. I wouldn't say that his chances are zero.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:53 PM
Apr 2015

Frankly, I wouldn't characterize his chances at all. If his enthusiastic supporters can win him a primary or two, his chances will improve. Lots of people were enthusiastic about Dennis Kucinich, too, but he never managed to win even a single primary. That should be job one for Sanders supporters. He will desperately need an early primary win. Failing that, his campaign will be short.

I'm not in an early primary state. Our precinct caucuses in MN are on Super Tuesday in 2016. I'll caucus for Sanders, but Minnesota will almost certainly go for Clinton in the caucuses on March 1. She's very popular here. The Iowa caucuses are going to be important, because they will have an impact on campaign financing, as they always do.

Sanders needs a primary win. Not a second-place finish with a wide margin. That won't help. He needs to win an early primary. So, that's where efforts need to go.

brooklynite

(94,670 posts)
18. You DO realize that this discussion is ONLY happening among a bunch of bloggers here?
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:54 PM
Apr 2015

And this this is a political blog where issues like electability get discussed?

And people who don't like Hillary Clinton say the same thing?

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
19. the one that annoys me is the bringing up of the Dukakis or Mondale campaigns whenever anybody to
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:56 PM
Apr 2015

the left of Lieberman is suggested as a presidential candidate.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
21. I wish it weren't so, but it is.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:57 PM
Apr 2015

A rumpled-looking self-described Democratic-Socialist with a very noticeable Brooklyn accent just ain't gonna win a national election.

It's not fair, it's not right, and I'm afraid it's completely true.

G_j

(40,367 posts)
27. How do we know that people aren't ready for a bold straight talker with a Brooklyn accent?
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 01:02 PM
Apr 2015

I wouldn't be so sure that they aren't.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
24. Most of us are on the same side. 'Unelectable' simply refers to the view of the moment.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 12:58 PM
Apr 2015

If the moment changes, the pendulum swings, the stars align, our views will likely change as well.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Precision and concision. That's the game.[/center][/font][hr]

Gothmog

(145,475 posts)
29. To win the 2016 election, the Democratic nominee will need to raise at least one billion dollars
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 01:04 PM
Apr 2015

I do not see Bernie being able to do this

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
36. The Old Testament Prophets of DU are much more confident with themselves than anyone else really is
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 01:19 PM
Apr 2015

The Old Testament Prophets of DU are much more confident with themselves than anyone else really is.

A bumper-sticker of one-dimensional wisdom here, a chicken mcnugget oracle there, and before we know it, Madame Marie begins falling for her own auguries.




No mountain is climbable until someone climbs it, no river is swimmable until someone swims it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"unelectable"