Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 09:02 AM Apr 2015

Social Justice

Social Justice is a way forward, not backward. It is not some dividing creation that people use to keep us fighting with one another.

I've read the previous sentence so many times, that I think it's time to put that one to rest.

The only people who feel that social justice is used to divide all us plebes are the ones who really only have self interest.

Every single gain, made economically, has begun with a social justice movement.

1) Womans suffrage
2) Civil Rights
3) Unions
4) Federal Minimum wage
5) Medicare/Medicaid
6) LGBT rights

These things improved the lives of all. And believe me people fought against it tooth and nail... that is why they are called struggles. They are not some mystical thing created to keep the middle class down and fighting with one another. I find that previous statement to be repulsive. It makes the success of these movements seem like those who participated were the enemy. When in fact, they were ones making the real sacrifices for something better. Not some keyboard warrior, sitting behind a desk, pounding out on a keyboard the tired old talking points of the MRA movement that social justice is a bad thing.

Think about how intertwined social justice movements were to lift ALL. Mostly economic justice. You cannot separate the two.

If you want to make some changes to the way things exist now, I would agree, but don't think I'm going to be dismissive the way some are about how the above gains were made. To do so is ignoring the history of how things actually were changed. No, they didn't happen because the mystical powers created them to divide us.





1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Social Justice (Original Post) boston bean Apr 2015 OP
Words of Harvey Milk to the CA Democratic Committe, 1978 Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #1
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
1. Words of Harvey Milk to the CA Democratic Committe, 1978
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 09:54 AM
Apr 2015

" Why are we here? Why are gay people here? And what's happening? What's happening to me is the antithesis of what you read about in the papers and what you hear about on the radio. You hear about and read about this movement to the right. That we must band together and fight back this movement to the right. And I'm here to go ahead and say that what you hear and read is what they want you to think because it's not happening. The major media in this country has talked about the movement to the right so the legislators think that there is indeed a movement to the right and that the Congress and the legislators and the city councils will start to move to the right the way the major media want them. So they keep on talking about this move to the right.
So let's look at 1977 and see if there was indeed a move to the right. In 1977, gay people had their rights taken away from them in Miami. But you must remember that in the week before Miami and the week after that, the word homosexual or gay appeared in every single newspaper in this nation in articles both pro and con. In every radio station, in every TV station and every household. For the first time in the history of the world, everybody was talking about it, good or bad. Unless you have dialogue, unless you open the walls of dialogue, you can never reach to change people's opinion. In those two weeks, more good and bad, but more about the word homosexual and gay was written than probably in the history of mankind. Once you have dialogue starting, you know you can break down prejudice. In 1977 we saw a dialogue start. In 1977, we saw a gay person elected in San Francisco. In 1977 we saw the state of Mississippi decriminalize marijuana. In 1977, we saw the convention of conventions in Houston. And I want to know where the movement to the right is happening.

What that is is a record of what happened last year. What we must do is make sure that 1978 continues the movement that is really happening that the media don't want you to know about. That is the movement to the left. It's up to CDC to put the pressures on Sacramento--but to break down the walls and the barriers so the movement to the left continues and progress continues in the nation. We have before us coming up several issues we must speak out on. Probably the most important issue outside the Briggs--which we will come to--but we do know what will take place this June. We know there's an issue on the ballot called Jarvis-Gann. We hear the taxpayers talk about it on both sides. But what you don't hear is that it's probably the most racist issue on the ballot in a long time. In the city and county of San Francisco, if it passes and we indeed have to lay off people, who will they be? The last in, and the first in, and who are the last in but the minorities? Jarvis-Gann is a racist issue. We must address that issue. We must not talk away from it. We must not allow them to talk about the money it's going to save, because look at who's going to save the money and who's going to get hurt.

We also have another issue that we've started in some of the north counties and I hope in some of the south counties it continues. In San Francisco elections we're asking--at least we hope to ask-- that the U.S. government put pressure on the closing of the South African consulate. That must happen. There is a major difference between an embassy in Washington which is a diplomatic bureau. and a consulate in major cities. A consulate is there for one reason only -- to promote business, economic gains, tourism, investment. And every time you have business going to South Africa, you're promoting a regime that's offensive.

In the city of San Francisco, if everyone of 51 percent of that city were to go to South Africa, they would be treated as second-class citizens. That is an offense to the people of San Francisco and I hope all my colleagues up there will take every step we can to close down that consulate and hope that people in other parts of the state follow us in that lead. The battles must be started some place and CDC is the greatest place to start the battles.
I can't forget the looks on faces of people who've lost hope. Be they gay, be they seniors, be they blacks looking for an almost-impossilbe job, be they Latins trying to explain their problems and aspirations in a tongue that's foreign to them. I personally will never forget that people are more important than buildings. I use the word "I" because I'm proud. I stand here tonight in front of my gay sisters, brothers and friends because I'm proud of you. I think it's time that we have many legislators who are gay and proud of that fact and do not have to remain in the closet. I think that a gay person, up-front, will not walk away from a responsibility and be afraid of being tossed out of office. After Dade County, I walked among the angry and the frustrated night after night and I looked at their faces. And in San Francisco, three days before Gay Pride Day, a person was killed just because he was gay. And that night, I walked among the sad and the frustrated at City Hall in San Francisco and later that night as they lit candles on Castro Street and stood in silence, reaching out for some symbolic thing that would give them hope. These were strong people, whose faces I knew from the shop, the streets, meetings and people who I never saw before but I knew. They were strong, but even they needed hope.

And the young gay people in the Altoona, Pennsylvanias and the Richmond, Minnesotas who are coming out and hear Anita Bryant on television and her story. The only thing they have to look forward to is hope. And you have to give them hope. Hope for a better world, hope for a better tomorrow, hope for a better place to come to if the pressures at home are too great. Hope that all will be all right. Without hope, not only gays, but the blacks, the seniors, the handicapped, the us'es, the us'es will give up. And if you help elect to the central committee and other offices, more gay people, that gives a green light to all who feel disenfranchised, a green light to move forward. It means hope to a nation that has given up, because if a gay person makes it, the doors are open to everyone.

So if there is a message I have to give, it is that I've found one overriding thing about my personal election, it's the fact that if a gay person can be elected, it's a green light. And you and you and you, you have to give people hope."
http://www.danaroc.com/guests_harveymilk_122208.html

Gosh, he's talking about all sorts of not so gay stuff, Prop 13 as a racist law, the striving of people of all sorts for justice and economic parity.
I love this speech because my father, who was a FDR Democrat and WW2 Vet had also explained to me that he thought Prop 13 was racist law. It's about property taxes, so Dad was pretty insightful about seeing how economic laws are often also about social issues, that a tax code law could in fact suppress the working classes and particularly working people who were black or Latin.
Many on DU are behind both Harvey and my Dad, circa 1978.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Social Justice