Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
106 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders: This is simply beyond belief... (Original Post) Playinghardball Apr 2015 OP
The trusting person I tend to be I believe it. gordianot Apr 2015 #1
I wish it was beyond belief. nt djean111 Apr 2015 #2
Me too! polichick Apr 2015 #6
It's time to draw the line and fight. Support the Populist Movement. rhett o rick Apr 2015 #3
Good news whatchamacallit Apr 2015 #8
I think I saw the campaign bus. It said on the side in big letters rhett o rick Apr 2015 #14
;) whatchamacallit Apr 2015 #25
Real Bright Idea... busterbrown Apr 2015 #30
It's the primaries. I'm supporting the best candidate who appears to be ready to run, and that's JDPriestly Apr 2015 #40
Agree with you on everything u stated.. busterbrown Apr 2015 #44
I'd much prefer... hippywife Apr 2015 #88
He was even getting along with O'Reilly last night. He's a great interview. 7962 Apr 2015 #42
The "pragmatism" excuse is what got us where we are today. rhett o rick Apr 2015 #63
So whats your game plan.. busterbrown Apr 2015 #68
The truth is I don't think the 99% has a chance. At best H.Clinton might slow down the slide into rhett o rick Apr 2015 #70
No blood in the streets, just votes for progressive candidates. Rolling over and playing dead ... Scuba Apr 2015 #71
“Mean” what a choice of words.. busterbrown Apr 2015 #74
If they're so insane, why vote for one of them pretending to be a liberal Democrat? Scuba Apr 2015 #75
HRC gives me a little Hope.. busterbrown Apr 2015 #78
Is it a hope meme or a real meme? R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #101
I don't know I don't have a hot tub time machine or a crystal ball DrKZ Apr 2015 #81
They'll say that no matter who we nominate. They said the same things about Obama. arcane1 Apr 2015 #79
Nader fiasco? What Nader fiasco are you talking about? A Simple Game Apr 2015 #96
Blammo! hifiguy Apr 2015 #83
Whydoyouhatehillaryclintonsomuch?don'tyouknowitisjustyouhavingsourgrapes!!!!! R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #100
ShebetrayedtheDemocraticPartyanddoes'tdeserveasecondchance.com. rhett o rick Apr 2015 #102
wow! I've never seen such blatant, open cynicism, as in that post! delrem Apr 2015 #20
Guess it's what passes for democracy these days whatchamacallit Apr 2015 #23
That post was NOT about contmpt for the voter. bvar22 Apr 2015 #27
I get your point. But I read cynicism and contempt of a total nature. nt delrem Apr 2015 #37
I am one of the members here who does NOT have contempt for the voters. bvar22 Apr 2015 #49
Yes, that's understood! delrem Apr 2015 #67
Thank You for the well written and thoughtful response. bvar22 Apr 2015 #69
I'll try to find one. delrem Apr 2015 #80
My vote for post of the day, maybe of the week. What the Nader blamers don't understand A Simple Game Apr 2015 #97
Thanks. Says it all. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #38
Absolutely. BeanMusical Apr 2015 #43
sweet Jesus that's a lot of money onethatcares Apr 2015 #48
I'm disapointed , I mean it's a little scary, what would Goldman think? Dragonfli Apr 2015 #61
I personally have chosen donnasgirl Apr 2015 #12
I agree. nm rhett o rick Apr 2015 #15
Sing it! merrily Apr 2015 #32
Hillary opposes cutting the inheritance tax. DanTex Apr 2015 #52
Huh? What does Clinton have to do with my post? I am not sure what you mean by "support the rhett o rick Apr 2015 #62
Just saying that you should be thrilled that the leading candidate supports this progressive DanTex Apr 2015 #85
The leading candidate helped Bush and the Republicons lie to the American people and one of rhett o rick Apr 2015 #87
This thread is about the inheritance tax. But the Iraq War is another illustration of DanTex Apr 2015 #89
Yes Republicons in the WH are disasterous especially when they get help from Democrats rhett o rick Apr 2015 #91
Support the Populist Movement and the POPULIST MEDIA. This is going on 25 years of appalachiablue Apr 2015 #66
Don't you dare apologize for ranting. This is an important statement. rhett o rick Apr 2015 #73
You are so correct DrKZ Apr 2015 #76
I second every one of your well-chosen words, hifiguy Apr 2015 #84
This is the Berlin Wall, even with the enormous efforts of Bernie & others on M$M, Dems. are appalachiablue Apr 2015 #105
Hear, hear. woo me with science Apr 2015 #104
Thanks Woo. We have a huge, (& manufactured) problem with this 'media issue'...See #105. appalachiablue Apr 2015 #106
No doubt the Republicans anticipate that a sizable chuck of that cash will come back to them GoneFishin Apr 2015 #4
Sad that it is no longer "beyond belief" to most Americans - but expected. polichick Apr 2015 #5
The more power they have ... GeorgeGist Apr 2015 #7
So utterly true, GeorgeGist Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #18
I believe that's spelled ghoulish merrily Apr 2015 #33
I think this message could resonate. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #9
This will be vetoed by Obama and Cyrano Apr 2015 #10
If we're lucky this won't OldHippieChick Apr 2015 #31
This is why the Senate and Congressional races are so important. It is imperative to replace as many sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #11
+1 merrily Apr 2015 #34
Run, Bernie, run.. mountain grammy Apr 2015 #13
I've volunteered for him. I hope others will too. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #36
I want him in the primary.. mountain grammy Apr 2015 #47
Tar and Feathers needed. Dont call me Shirley Apr 2015 #16
No Bernie, what is beyond belief robbob Apr 2015 #17
Bernie is saying the same donnasgirl Apr 2015 #21
Hey, who cares? The Kardashians are on. Chipper Chat Apr 2015 #19
People will care when they can no longer afford DirectTV and 4G. Initech Apr 2015 #22
I don't even own, or can afford a TV, but can afford to share WiFi with a neighbor friend Dragonfli Apr 2015 #64
And there you have it. The biggest problem with todays voters. 7962 Apr 2015 #45
The biggest problem with today's voters is twofold Scootaloo Apr 2015 #57
Fucked by the GOP again..... blackspade Apr 2015 #24
Seven House Democrats voted for the bill RufusTFirefly Apr 2015 #29
They're not DINOs....just misunderstood... blackspade Apr 2015 #50
Kirsten Sinema..... typical.... truebrit71 Apr 2015 #86
I was very disappointed by the vote of my own Rep., Sanford Bishop. n/t Laelth Apr 2015 #94
Just yesterday AuntPatsy Apr 2015 #26
The downtrodden, suffering, rich, need a tax break. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #28
Thanks, Bernie Sanders. So true. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #35
WELFARE for the rich. pansypoo53219 Apr 2015 #39
keep speaking the truth Bernie. The people need to know exactly why their liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #41
Question. Stonepounder Apr 2015 #46
I like Bernie Sanders but he has said that he would only run if... StarzGuy Apr 2015 #51
K & R. He's the best and hardest working man in Washington, by far. appalachiablue Apr 2015 #53
Where is MSM ? Where is Hillary ? orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #54
The perfect scrolling ad for the Democrats in the next election LiberalLovinLug Apr 2015 #55
But but but...let's give those assholes that destroyed the economy in 2008 Rex Apr 2015 #56
K and R bigwillq Apr 2015 #58
Where are the other Democratic candidates on this issue? Have they spoken up? Enthusiast Apr 2015 #59
This is purely a symbolic vote by the House. PBass Apr 2015 #60
But there's "no difference between Dems and gop." So sayeth lazy Cha Apr 2015 #65
I see you've been reading DU again... n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #90
Yes I have.. Cha Apr 2015 #92
republicans. they give not one shit about the voters. spanone Apr 2015 #72
sanders' rhetorical style is v similar to chomsky's redruddyred Apr 2015 #77
Think of all the jobs the wealthy won't create! wolfie001 Apr 2015 #82
Bernie!! AzDar Apr 2015 #93
This thread has hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Apr 2015 #95
Look who runs the House--it's not beyond belief at all. That's their greedy agenda. nt MADem Apr 2015 #98
Run, Bernie, Run. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #99
Are GOP voters paying attention? moondust Apr 2015 #103
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
3. It's time to draw the line and fight. Support the Populist Movement.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 01:30 PM
Apr 2015

Support progressive Democratic candidates via organizations outside the Party or directly.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
14. I think I saw the campaign bus. It said on the side in big letters
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 02:33 PM
Apr 2015

"Clinton Populism brought to you by Goldman-Sachs"

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
30. Real Bright Idea...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:22 PM
Apr 2015

Nominate Bernie...Republican Corporatists, controlling billions of dollars ready for 2016.. would be overwhelmed with Joy with a Sanders Victory..As soon as Sander’s won the nomination he would be quickly pegged as a Karl Marx type Communist who would be intent on bring the evils of Marxism to Washington.....And the majority of low informed voters in this country would suck the lies and evil right the hell up... Jesus! Doesn’t the Ralph Nader fiasco scare the shit out of you? But this would be worse.. all three branches would be controlled by white TBaggers....

And I am nuts about Bernie, not crazy about Hillary..but its pragmatically the best we can do..

And please don’t tell me how weak I am. Or how I don’t hold to my convictions.. So boring..

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
40. It's the primaries. I'm supporting the best candidate who appears to be ready to run, and that's
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:46 PM
Apr 2015

Bernie.

By the way, watch Bernie's appearance on Bill O'Reilly's show. Bernie is one of the few Democrats who can talk to O'Reilly and get Bernie's not O'Reilly's message across. Bernie shows mastery in the way he dealt with the interview.

I wonder whether Clinton will appear on O'Reilly's show. I suspect she would become very rattled and show her frustration. That's why I'm betting on Bernie. Bernie is no Communist. You and I know that. In fact, his '"socialism" is more like FDR democracy. I think Bernie could win if nominated. And I am going to try to help him get the nomination or get a fair shake in the general election if he runs as an independent who caucuses with Democrats.

His voting record is stellar.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
44. Agree with you on everything u stated..
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:50 PM
Apr 2015

I would love Bernie to be Pres.. But this current plaque of ignorance in this Country scares the shit out of me..And in my opinion Hillary is 1000 times better than the alternative.

She needs all that Wall Street Money to compete.. She’s dead in the water if she doesn’t get it..
Besides I ‘m sensing a change in her politics.. Hopefully

hippywife

(22,767 posts)
88. I'd much prefer...
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 12:17 AM
Apr 2015

to read a transcript if one exists, because in order to see Bernie do this, I'd also have to watch and listen to O'Reilly. This is something I avoid as I tend to not have the stomach for that man's antics and BS.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
42. He was even getting along with O'Reilly last night. He's a great interview.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:47 PM
Apr 2015

Look it up, it was pretty interesting. Bill only had him on to be critical of Clinton, I imagine, but he covered other issues as well

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
63. The "pragmatism" excuse is what got us where we are today.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:29 PM
Apr 2015

But pragmatism shouldn't be used as an excuse to let our freedoms and liberties drain away. We are sinking deeper and deeper into tyranny every year and eventually we will all be paupers and can look back and say, "Well, at least we were pragmatic."

I say frack pragmatism, it's time to kick some Oligarchy ass.

I am glad our founders weren't pragmatic.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
68. So whats your game plan..
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:02 PM
Apr 2015

Are you prepared to arm yourself and carry the fight into the streets as our founders did?

It’s so easy to say, but u know its a fantasy..

Our only chance to prevent the Trepublicans from controlling all 3 branches of Govt..is to hope HRC can pull it off.. And we all know its about the money..

Those who supported Nader certainly thought they we’re doing the right thing..but shit, looked what happened...

By the way Bernie Sanders is a great man, whom I would definitely support as our nominee.....but these are scary times... You think we would be in the position we are in today if Gore was Pres?





 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
70. The truth is I don't think the 99% has a chance. At best H.Clinton might slow down the slide into
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:19 PM
Apr 2015

tyranny. If Bernie is the Democratic nominee, I am hoping he will wake up those lulled into complacency by the corp-Dems and Republicons. But I recognize that the Oligarchy has unlimited resources and are willing to imprison millions (as they are with the black community) and brutalize protestors. I don't support violence but we need to stand and fight them where it hurts, their profits.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
71. No blood in the streets, just votes for progressive candidates. Rolling over and playing dead ...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:23 PM
Apr 2015

... 'cause the big bad Republicans might do something mean is a sure-fire path to losing the remainder of our Democracy and ceding the entire economy to the wealthiest.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
74. “Mean” what a choice of words..
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:30 PM
Apr 2015

Like nothing really to fear here.. These people are fucking insane..And we’ve have got to give it our best shot to find someone to at least slow em down a bit...Warren isn’t running, Sanders is a man I admire but he’s old and would be labeled a Marxist out of the Gate..We don’t have a plethora of choices here..

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
78. HRC gives me a little Hope..
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:39 PM
Apr 2015

“IF” why would you use that word.. At least we could put a temporary hold on these idiots for 4 yrs with Clinton and begin the process of developing a new set of warriors..

 

DrKZ

(53 posts)
81. I don't know I don't have a hot tub time machine or a crystal ball
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:48 PM
Apr 2015

I did not vote for Nadar but I am tired of that old worn out axiom ... Do you know how many names were scrubbed from lists in North Florida in 2000? That was a huge issue far more of an issue than Nadar ... Yes, there were butterfly ballots and then there were the voting machines in Volusia that counted backwards ... I can continue. It is easy to blame people who vote the conscience which is their right to do ... it is much more difficult to look at the cold hard reality of what transpired and how about Katherine Harris Jeb and the SCOTUS?

These are frightening times and they are frightening times in terms of several significant issues the environment (and Clinton is for fracking and has been quiet on the Keystone pipeline). war and she is a neo-con I can go back to her Iraq war vote but I can also cite what happened in Honduras when her state department ovethrew a democratically elected government and what she said about children running for their lives ...

And then there is the "free trade" (Orwellian language) hoax and you must see through her populist language which is a faint faint attempt to sound like Elizabeth Warren. She is not just a neo-con but a neo-liberal (her corporate support demonstrates that)

So we do have a choice and I am tired of stupid phrases like don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good and look at 2000 and blah blah blah because this began with Ronnie Raygun and the privatization that took place the demonization of workers of teachers of schools etc was never stopped by Clinton or his foundation and her positions are just as conservative ... why do you think DeBlasio has not yet endorsed her?

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
79. They'll say that no matter who we nominate. They said the same things about Obama.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:41 PM
Apr 2015

Plus, you assume that Dems won't have any victories in congress. Isn't it possible to take congress back?

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
96. Nader fiasco? What Nader fiasco are you talking about?
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 08:03 AM
Apr 2015

You don't mean the time that Jeb Bush and the Supreme Court stole the election in Florida and then started the meme that it was Nader's fault to divert attention from the real reason? You didn't fall for that, did you? Was it Nader's fault that Gore lost his home state?

So do you assign equal blame for the other 7 candidates that each got more votes than the difference between Bush and Gore? Didn't even know that fact did you? I bet you knew about Jeb and the Supreme Court though and still blame Nader. Why repeat it, it just makes you a pawn in the Republican's game. You have to know what the problem is before you can fix it.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
100. Whydoyouhatehillaryclintonsomuch?don'tyouknowitisjustyouhavingsourgrapes!!!!!
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 11:22 AM
Apr 2015

Or some knob head told be or the such.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
20. wow! I've never seen such blatant, open cynicism, as in that post!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 02:44 PM
Apr 2015

And worse, the whole crew is proud to back it up.
The contempt for the voter being shown in that post is amazing.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
27. That post was NOT about contmpt for the voter.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:18 PM
Apr 2015

It is about Hillary's Team noticing how much America tuned in to Warren's legitimate populist message, and then trying to steal it.
This was designed to fool the "Rubes".
Obama did the same "Populist" scam while running, but he had no track record.
Hillary does have a track record.

The Populist Rhetoric falling from Hillary's lips sounds empty and insincere.
We ALL already know WHO she is, and WHOM she works for.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
49. I am one of the members here who does NOT have contempt for the voters.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:50 PM
Apr 2015

Plenty here subscribe to the myth that Nader caused Gore to lose because they are stupid voters.

Winning elections and motivating the voters is always the JOB of LEADERSHIP.
When a voter votes for someone else...that is a Failure of Leadership,
not the voters.


I DO have contempt for the 3rd Way, Centrists, DLC, Republican Lites that have infiltrated our Party, and that contempt has earned since Bill Clinton abandoned traditional Democratic Party Principles and ushered in Republican Lite.
I have nothing but respect for traditional populist Democrats.

I am also cynical about the frauds, scams, and Kabuki Theater played by our politicians.
That cynicism has been earned by being an active Democrat for over 47 years,
and watching the scams play out over the last 30 years.
Anyone who watches closely (and I mean watching C-Span at 2AM) for a few years,
and is NOT a cynic....is not watching closely enough.


[font color=firebrick][center]"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone [/font]
[/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center]
[/font]

delrem

(9,688 posts)
67. Yes, that's understood!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:50 PM
Apr 2015

I was responding to the cynicism and contempt expressed by this post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6516268

" If she can pull off the populist meme, she'll go a long way toward enlisting the support of ordinary Americans.
I think it's a good move on her part. ..."

I'm using the term in this way:

"cynical
adjective
2.
showing contempt for accepted standards of honesty or morality by one's actions, especially by actions that exploit the scruples of others."

I'm Canadian and I recall that in the '08 election it was said that Obama told the Canadian PM to pay no heed to his talk about renegotiating the FTA because it was just campaign rhetoric. Like many who read and post to DU I said "no way Obama said that!", because it'd be just too *cynical* of him if he did. Unfortunately, it turned out to be true. In this case "If she (HRC) can pull off the populist meme..." aren't HRC's words, they're the words of a DU HRC supporter, and IMO they express open cynicism.

Just my opinion, mind you, but I see nothing to contradict it.

eta: when I see increasing *cynicism* in politics, I'm increasingly *sceptical* of the politicians who express it. That doesn't make me a cynic, it means I have a fairly natural reaction when confronted by cynics.

eta2: Also, I take it as a given that third-way is *not* populist or progressive, and in fact is the contrary of it. I take it as a given that when the $2billion in IOUs are called in, it won't be to demand progressive policy.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
69. Thank You for the well written and thoughtful response.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:16 PM
Apr 2015

!

Can you document the White House aid going to Canada to tell the PM that Obama was only saying that to get votes?

That has been sticking in my craw for over 6 years.
I heard the story back then, but could only find one source, and it is a source that I don't use on DU. I was dismayed that the other Media outlets here didn't cover this story, as far as I was aware. Since I only had one source, I began to doubt that it happened.

If you could provide a Canadian source, I will be in your debt.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
80. I'll try to find one.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:45 PM
Apr 2015

By the way, thanks for your post re. Blanche Lincoln
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026524044#post16
"THIS is what happen when the people try to replace Congress:
The Arkansas Democratic Primary of 2010 was a heart breaking eye opener for the Grass Roots and Organized LABOR. We were given a Look Behind the Curtain,
and it wasn't very pretty. ..."

You are VERY good at this. Keep it up.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
97. My vote for post of the day, maybe of the week. What the Nader blamers don't understand
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 08:36 AM
Apr 2015

is how foolish they look when they assign more blame to the few that voted for Nader than the millions that voted for Bush. Not to mention where the true blame lies.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
38. Thanks. Says it all.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:42 PM
Apr 2015

Behind those law and Wall Street firm names are the interests of a lot of multinational corporations. It's all opaque. You don't really know what you are getting when you see those names. But you do not it isn't good for ordinary Americans.

BeanMusical

(4,389 posts)
43. Absolutely.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:47 PM
Apr 2015

I don't understand why it's so hard for some people to see right trough this thin facade.

onethatcares

(16,168 posts)
48. sweet Jesus that's a lot of money
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:45 PM
Apr 2015

it's no wonder we working stiffs are being swept under the rug and fighting for crumbs.

Our country is totally fucked.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
61. I'm disapointed , I mean it's a little scary, what would Goldman think?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:17 PM
Apr 2015

I like most here I assume was hoping for more of this



and a great deal of this



I hope she hasn't changed completely, everybody loves Goldman and war, this is simply unacceptable!

donnasgirl

(656 posts)
12. I personally have chosen
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 02:06 PM
Apr 2015

Directly, and I have made up my mind and will be backing Bernie Sanders unless he choses otherwise.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
52. Hillary opposes cutting the inheritance tax.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:59 PM
Apr 2015

And this bill has no chance to become law because Obama opposes it also.

So maybe it's time to support the Democratic party rather than find excuses to pretend they are the same as the Republicans.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
62. Huh? What does Clinton have to do with my post? I am not sure what you mean by "support the
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:24 PM
Apr 2015

Democratic Party." Do you mean blindly support all Democrats equally? I support Democrats that uphold Democratic principles. I do not blindly support anyone. And will you guys plez stop the old worn out Strawman that some people in DU think that the two parties are the same. I doubt that anyone here has ever said that. But it seems to be a "go to" when disparaging the Left.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
85. Just saying that you should be thrilled that the leading candidate supports this progressive
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 10:14 PM
Apr 2015

position along with many others. Rather than being "ready for someone else".

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
87. The leading candidate helped Bush and the Republicons lie to the American people and one of
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 12:10 AM
Apr 2015

the consequences was the brutal deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children. You may be able to look the other way but I won't. She lost her chance to be "progressive" when she sold out to the Bush Crime Family.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
89. This thread is about the inheritance tax. But the Iraq War is another illustration of
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 12:27 AM
Apr 2015

why Republicans in the White House are disastrous.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
91. Yes Republicons in the WH are disasterous especially when they get help from Democrats
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 12:33 AM
Apr 2015

that are supposed to keep them in check. Sorry, but I didn't see your link to the H. Clinton quote re. the inheritance tax. It's not that I doubt you, but like to have it for future reference.

appalachiablue

(41,140 posts)
66. Support the Populist Movement and the POPULIST MEDIA. This is going on 25 years of
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:47 PM
Apr 2015

corporate media consolidation allowed by Clinton's Telecom Act of 1996, like the financial deregulation of Banks in the late 90s which are now consolidated. Before that, Reagan dismissing the Fairness Doctrine and the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. These are RW Media monopolies with Hate Radio and Fox blasting throughout the country. Even NPR and PBS have come under the influence of corporate $.

No amount of liberal/left scorn, distain or indifference changes the fact that this broadcasting has altered the country for the worse, and nothing will change w/o opposing it. And no, the Internet God is not immune, it will be cut into and packaged for profit. Besides, not everyone inhabits the internet for their life and for the news or wants too.
The patchwork scene of irregular, few and sparse left radio programming isn't the answer, and FSTV is excellent but not available broadly. And the TV police who attack if you're found out- Cut it! think that ridding TVs and radios so people will love the internet, is going to end RW Hate propaganda?

The Left must find funds to provide an accessible, independent media in several formats or forget democracy. All the keyboard activism, blogs, and well done progressive news outlets on the net cannot compare to the 24/7, corporate media landscape. And for people who don't pour over DU, truthout, alternet, raw story, Daily Kos, etc, after their 60 hr. work week, errands, laundry and life,

~They'll (L elites) be singing on the mountain, but you won't be there to hear them~, as my father said.

(*Sorry for the rant, nothing personal. Just that MEDIA is left out of Dem. thinking which is heavy with critics & writers. Alternative Media is also essential, and half the battle of educating people about what's going on and Populism .

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
73. Don't you dare apologize for ranting. This is an important statement.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:25 PM
Apr 2015

We must counter the Oligarchy owned media.

appalachiablue

(41,140 posts)
105. This is the Berlin Wall, even with the enormous efforts of Bernie & others on M$M, Dems. are
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 02:35 PM
Apr 2015

handicapped by the monstrosity of RW corporate media. And nobody wants to talk about it or try to counter it. Many conservatives and populists would go APE, if they knew the reality of many anti-democratic and anti-human issues at stake. Is this 'media matter' insurmountable? or the ultimate 'Human Challenge'? H*ll no!

Hannibal crossed the Alps centuries ago, the Allies invaded Normandy to liberate France, and we sent a man to the moon for Christ's sake!

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
4. No doubt the Republicans anticipate that a sizable chuck of that cash will come back to them
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 01:30 PM
Apr 2015

one way or another.

Cyrano

(15,041 posts)
10. This will be vetoed by Obama and
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 01:52 PM
Apr 2015

there aren't enough Democratic pricks in the Senate to override his veto. (And if ever if there were, they wouldn't out themselves on such a visible issue.)

Nonetheless, the Republicans have once again shown what they are and what they believe in.

OldHippieChick

(2,434 posts)
31. If we're lucky this won't
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:24 PM
Apr 2015

make it out of the Senate. The Dems can filibuster as there are not 60 votes to stop it.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
11. This is why the Senate and Congressional races are so important. It is imperative to replace as many
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 01:53 PM
Apr 2015

of these Corporate thieves with good, Progressive, not Third Way who are on the same page as these thieves, Democrats.

With a Congress and Senate filled with Reps of the Working Class nothing like this could happen.

With all the focus on the WH races, I am worried that people won't be working as hard as they should on where the people actually still have some power.

mountain grammy

(26,622 posts)
13. Run, Bernie, run..
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 02:06 PM
Apr 2015

it's the only way the mainstream goons we call the media will cover this.

Run Bernie. Do it for 13 million people getting shafted.. There was a time the earned income credit was a huge thing for me and my kids. The only tax credit for the working poor.

mountain grammy

(26,622 posts)
47. I want him in the primary..
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:39 PM
Apr 2015

if the totally unexpected happens and he's our nominee, I'm putting a banner on my camper and hitting the road next summer and fall. I think he would be an excellent president.

Chipper Chat

(9,680 posts)
19. Hey, who cares? The Kardashians are on.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 02:43 PM
Apr 2015

Honey, can you bring me a bag of chips to go with my cheap beer? Who'd you say won American Idol? Oh crap! I cant find the right channel. Gotta get rid of these "news channels." Cable needs to delete them and add more shows like Duck Dynasty? What's that honey? We wont be able to pay the rent next month? Well, it's those damn democrats. Nothing but tax us to the hilt and spend spend spend and woohoo for the gays. And what's Obama done for us? Whatz that - just turn it to Fox News? OK, honey.

Initech

(100,079 posts)
22. People will care when they can no longer afford DirectTV and 4G.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 02:52 PM
Apr 2015

I'm at the point now where I'm having to pick between the two. Having a phone is more important than satellite television. Netflix is so much better than broadcast anyways.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
64. I don't even own, or can afford a TV, but can afford to share WiFi with a neighbor friend
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:34 PM
Apr 2015

I also own an old, but still well functioning DLP projector that combined with my laptop and a pull-down 72" projector screen gets me all the TV I could ever want, Netflix, couchtuner, Hulu and progressive news online has me covered far better than the overpriced dish and cable rackets (minus all the propaganda I might add)

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
45. And there you have it. The biggest problem with todays voters.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:54 PM
Apr 2015

The Pres talked about wishing voting was mandatory; I think the opposite. I dont want ANYONE voting who cant even name one of their Senators.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
57. The biggest problem with today's voters is twofold
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:13 PM
Apr 2015

1) The lack of quality candidates. You have rich guy #1 who only considers policy for the rich, and you have rich guy #2 who only considers policy for the rich.

2) The influence of wealth on the system makes it a nearly impossible bar to clear for anyone who doesn't have an independent 6-digit income. You can have all the ideas you want, but unless you have millions of dollars to throw out there, they're worthless; and banks won't give loans to run political campaigns.

So. if you get the same 1%-serving policy, and the game is rigged so those are the only interests that are actually interacted with, why not stay home to watch the kardashians?

of course there's activism, but American activism ,sadly, rarely gets things done. and activism that does get things done is usually eagerly attacked by both the "right" and "left" - go back to read DU during occyupy or the Ferguson protests, there's so much hate for peope daring to stand up for their own interests.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
29. Seven House Democrats voted for the bill
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:22 PM
Apr 2015

Ashford (Neb.)
Bishop (Ga.)
Costa (Calif.)
Cuellar (Texas)
Peterson (Minn.)
Ruppersburger (Md.)
Sinema (Ariz.)

Mind-boggling.
But hey, they're Democrats. So we can't say anything bad about them, right?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
28. The downtrodden, suffering, rich, need a tax break.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:21 PM
Apr 2015

Or, they'll turn off the spigot of the trickle down treasures aimed at the poor.

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
46. Question.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:08 PM
Apr 2015

What are the chances that the Senate will also vote to eliminate the estate tax?
If the Senate passes this as well, what are the chances that Obama will sign it?

Please, this is not snark. Is this just the Rethugs in the House playing to their base, knowing that this bill doesn't have a chance, or is does this nonsense actually have a chance of becoming law?

Thanks.

StarzGuy

(254 posts)
51. I like Bernie Sanders but he has said that he would only run if...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:56 PM
Apr 2015

...he could be assured he would have the financial wherewithal to run and win. I don't see him getting the necessary financial backing to mount a legit campaign. He's certainly not going get money from the Wall Street barons. I doubt that there are enough $5 contributions out there either. Just my 2 cents worth and I will be happy to vote for him if he runs...

LiberalLovinLug

(14,174 posts)
55. The perfect scrolling ad for the Democrats in the next election
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:13 PM
Apr 2015

...so you just know it will be the last thing they do.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
56. But but but...let's give those assholes that destroyed the economy in 2008
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:13 PM
Apr 2015

tax credits! That way they will know we are still totally clueless about how much they steal from the Treasury!

PBass

(1,537 posts)
60. This is purely a symbolic vote by the House.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:59 PM
Apr 2015

Just like their votes to overturn Obamacare, and to restrict or ban women's reproductive rights. It will not pass the Senate, but even if it does (it won't), it would be vetoed by President Obama.

wolfie001

(2,240 posts)
82. Think of all the jobs the wealthy won't create!
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 08:59 PM
Apr 2015

Rather, they'll stick their extra benjamins in the Cayman's never to return. This happened back in 2003, didn't help the economy at all. It helped Mitt Romney though.....

moondust

(19,988 posts)
103. Are GOP voters paying attention?
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 02:04 PM
Apr 2015

Almost none of them are in that 0.2% and no doubt many of the bubbas could use a raise rather than higher taxes.

Perhaps this is what the heavy police militarization and thuggery are all about: the oligarchs know that people will eventually revolt.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders: This is ...