Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPublic Citizen: Hatch Fast Track Bill Faces Broad Congressional, Public Opposition (TPP)
Hatch Bill Would Revive Controversial 2002 Fast Track Mechanism That Faces Broad Congressional, Public Opposition
Todays Proposal Replicates Language of Failed 2014 Bill, Would Expand Same Broken Trade Model That Has Led to $912 Bllion Trade Deficit, Loss of Millions of Manufacturing Jobs, Attacks on Public Interest Policies
Washington, D.C.
April 16, 2016
The trade authority bill introduced today would revive the controversial Fast Track procedures to which
nearly all U.S. House of Representatives,Democrats and a sizable block of House Republicans, already have announced opposition. Most of the text of this bill replicates word for word the text of the 2014 Fast Track bill, which itself replicated much of the 2002 Fast Track bill. Public Citizen calls on Congress to again oppose the outdated, anti-democratic Fast Track authority as a first step to replacing decades of trade policy that has led to the loss of millions of middle-class jobs and the rollback of critical public interest safeguards.
In the past 21 years, Fast Track authority has been authorized only once by Congress from 2002 to
2007. In 1998, the U.S. House of Representatives voted down Fast Track for President Bill Clinton,
with 71 GOP members joining 171 House Democrats. Todays bill explicitly grandfathers in Fast Track coverage for the almost-completed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and would extend Fast Track procedures for three to six years. The bill would delegate away Congress constitutional trade authority, even after the Obama administration dismissed bipartisan and bicameral demands that the TPP include enforceable currency manipulation disciplines. The trade authority proposal does not require negotiators to actually meet Congress negotiating objectives in order to obtain the Fast Track privileges, making the bills negotiating objectives entirely unenforceable.Congress is being asked to delegate away its constitutional trade authority over the TPP, even after the administration ignored bicameral, bipartisan demands about the agreements terms, and then also grant blank-check authority to whomever may be the next president for any agreements he or she may pursue, said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizens Global Trade Watch. Rather than putting Congress in the drivers seat on trade, this bill is just the same old Fast Track that puts Congress in the trunk in handcuffs. I expect that Congress will say no to it.
Instead of establishing a new exit ramp, the bill literally replicates the same impossible conditions
from past Fast Track bills that make the procedural disapproval mechanism to remove an agreement from Fast Track unusable. A resolution to do so must be approved by both the Senate Finance and the House Ways and Means committees and then be passed by both chambers within 60 days. The bills only new feature in this respect is a new consultation and compliance procedure that would only be usable after an agreement was already signed and entered into, at which point changes to the pact could be made only if all other negotiating parties agreed to reopen negotiations and then agreed to the changes (likely after extracting further concessions from the United States). That process would require approval by 60 Senators to take a pact off of Fast Track consideration, even though a simple majority no vote in the Senate would have the same effect on an agreement. In contrast, the 1988 Fast Track empowered either the House Ways and Means or the Senate Finance committees to vote by simple majority to remove a pact from Fast Track consideration, with no additional floor votes required. And, such a disapproval action was authorized beforea president could sign and enter into a trade agreement.Chairman Hatch said he would never accept changes that make it possible for Congress to remove Fast Track from an agreement that does not measure up, and he got his way, said Wallach.
What is being advertised as a new safeguard is not an exit from Fast Tracks confiscation of Congress policymaking prerogatives, but new curtains hung over the same brick wall.
http://www.citizen.org/documents/press-release-fast-track-introduced-april-2015.pdf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 614 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Public Citizen: Hatch Fast Track Bill Faces Broad Congressional, Public Opposition (TPP) (Original Post)
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
OP
TPP trade negotiators received multimillion dollar bonuses from CitiGroup & BOA
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
#2
We can defeat Fast Track on the FLOOR next week, if not demoralized by the committee vote which we
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
#3
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. I wonder if Jamie Dimon will be whipping for this. nt
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)2. TPP trade negotiators received multimillion dollar bonuses from CitiGroup & BOA
http://billmoyers.com/2014/02/20/obama-admin%E2%80%99s-tpp-trade-officials-received-hefty-bonuses-from-big-banks/
(so it wouldn't be surprising if Dimon would have some interest in "motivating" Congressmen to enable the process.)
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)3. We can defeat Fast Track on the FLOOR next week, if not demoralized by the committee vote which we
... lost yesterday (which is what the corporatists are counting on).