Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,010 posts)
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 08:28 PM Apr 2015

Borowitz Report - Americans Favor Fifteen Dollars an Hour for Congress



WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report) – Americans took to the streets in large numbers on Thursday to show their support for a fifteen-dollar-an-hour wage for members of Congress.

In major cities across the nation, fast-food workers and other service employees held signs, shouted chants, and gave impassioned speeches to demonstrate their conviction that Congress deserves a maximum hourly wage of fifteen dollars.

“Members of Congress are people, just like you and me,” Tracy Klugian, a McDonald’s employee who took part in the Washington protest, said. “They should be paid what they deserve.”

Assuming that they continue to take off approximately two hundred and forty days a year, members of Congress earning the proposed maximum would see their average annual income adjusted from a hundred and seventy-four thousand dollars to thirteen thousand five hundred dollars, a salary that many marchers called “fair and equitable.”

“I know what members of Congress will say: ‘I can’t live on that,’” Harland Dorrinson, a protester in Chicago, said. “Well, if they want to earn more, they should go out and acquire some skills.”

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/americans-favor-fifteen-dollars-an-hour-for-congress?mbid=nl_041615_Borowitz&cndid=25394153&mbid=nl_041615_Borowitz&CNDID=25394153&spMailingID=7670291&spUserID=MzM2OTE2NTg3MTcS1&spJobID=661569193&spReportId=NjYxNTY5MTkzS0
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Borowitz Report - Americans Favor Fifteen Dollars an Hour for Congress (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2015 OP
Satire aside, that sounds like a GOOD IDEA to me!!!!! MADem Apr 2015 #1
Most of them wouldn't care, they spent millions to get the damn job in the first place... Fumesucker Apr 2015 #2
Exactly. Most aren't there to make,....oh wait. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #6
OK then, we'll throw in a travel allowance...emphasis on the "allowance" libdem4life Apr 2015 #3
They should be paid nothing dumbcat Apr 2015 #4
Some act like they've been sentenced to community service. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2015 #7
Actually, that leaves them wide open to bribery in all its forms. eppur_se_muova Apr 2015 #11
Do you think $15/hr dumbcat Apr 2015 #13
how about if they pay us $15/hr for each hour they aren't at actual work?? this amount niyad Apr 2015 #5
If they cannot "acquire some skills" perhaps justhanginon Apr 2015 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2015 #9
No, pay them millions, and forbid all profiteering from their service dreamnightwind Apr 2015 #10
$15? Octafish Apr 2015 #12

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Satire aside, that sounds like a GOOD IDEA to me!!!!!
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 08:38 PM
Apr 2015

The irony is, they work so little they'd never make a forty hour week....they'd be eligible for welfare, food stamps, etc.

Bet they'd take a new view of the "Welfare State" if they had to live on that salary....

dumbcat

(2,120 posts)
4. They should be paid nothing
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 08:50 PM
Apr 2015

They should perform their task of representing their constituents as a public service.

eppur_se_muova

(36,263 posts)
11. Actually, that leaves them wide open to bribery in all its forms.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 10:51 AM
Apr 2015

One reason the Texas legislature has always been so corrupt is that the anti-government founding fathers of Texas chose that approach. It meant that only the independently wealthy could afford to enter the Lege -- and that meant mostly cotton plantation owners and big cattle ranchers (at the time), with no representation of the poor former Mexicans who made up much of the state's population. If you set out to deliberately plan a system to keep the privileged in power, you couldn't come up with anything more effective. And that was the point.

Try reading Robert Caro's bio of LBJ, particularly vol. 1, "The Path to Power", which describes Johnson's boyhood years through his start in Texas politics. His father was a member of the Lege but not wealthy, and not amenable to bribery -- the usual formula was "beef, bourbon, and blondes", provided by influence-peddlers who wanted legislation that benefited their interests -- and he suffered for it, eventually going bankrupt and losing his farm. He could have avoided impoverishing his family if only he had been open to a little corruption, and LBJ evidently considered him a fool for sticking to his ideals. Not averse to a little corruption himself, LBJ became a millionaire through several businesses whose real ownership was hidden from public scrutiny.

No, starving the watchdogs doesn't work.

dumbcat

(2,120 posts)
13. Do you think $15/hr
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 11:11 AM
Apr 2015

is going to change that? The watchdogs will be satisfied and reject bribes for that?

niyad

(113,323 posts)
5. how about if they pay us $15/hr for each hour they aren't at actual work?? this amount
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 10:06 PM
Apr 2015

goes to each constituent in their districts, with the senators each being responsible for half the population of their states.

justhanginon

(3,290 posts)
8. If they cannot "acquire some skills" perhaps
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:05 PM
Apr 2015

they could get a second job like so many of their constituents have to do. I understand Wal-Mart hires a lot of part time workers. Pays not great but thankfully you can get health insurance through ACA if you lose your seat in Congress.

Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
10. No, pay them millions, and forbid all profiteering from their service
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:02 AM
Apr 2015

I know this is an unpopular opinion, but I've thought it through after saying so here before and getting panned for it, and I'm standing my ground on this unpopular opinion.

I hate them as much as anyone, believe me.

I favor paying them literally millions a year. The legislation authorizing the pay raise needs to also contain strict regulations forbidding them from profiting in any way from their service, while they are in office and after they leave office.

It's an extremely important job, they should be paid accordingly. They're getting paid, just not by us. Who do we think they work for? The people who pay them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Borowitz Report - America...