General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmerrily
(45,251 posts)Just thought I'd join the crowd, for once.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)You'll probably see why later in this thread.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Running back please!
Chellee
(2,102 posts)www.draftsnooper2fortheDallasCowboysrunningbackpleasehe'dbesupergoodprobably.org
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)You have to think this through. First, running back? You'll get hurt silly! Large and strong men lift weights all day and practice trying to kill running backs. Second, for the Cowboys? You have a problem with post season bonuses? You want to be the back up punter for the Seahawks or Patriots. Safe and pays well. Good luck.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Smart move on her part with the polls showing her dropping like a stone.
merrily
(45,251 posts)donnasgirl
(656 posts)but she is still going to receive my vote, I will write her in. I know I will catch hell from some people here but I simply will not and can not back a Corporatist in any way shape or form.
merrily
(45,251 posts)A couple of days ago, a relative said she was writing in Warren, too. (My whole family is Democratic, except for one member of the younger generation. We can't figure out why he strayed.)
I forgot to ask her whether she meant the primary or the general. She doesn't post here, so DU rules do not apply to her.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6485759
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)to do also.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)mac56
(17,574 posts)Brother Buzz
(36,466 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)I've been on timeouts for fighting with AverageTroll, but I've never been banned.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Never mind.
I thought you meant that I had gotten the pizza delivery, yaknow?
yuiyoshida
(41,861 posts)Obviously didn't need any more Grey Poupon!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)and closer to the truth than I would like to admit.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Sienna86
(2,149 posts)I personally need a candidate who understands the middle class economic crunch, the struggles of families to pay college tuition, what a gallon of milk costs, and doesn't want us to get screwed by Wall Street and big banks. I need a candidate who inspires me.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)She touched on all those points clearly like she does. The audience was cheering her to the rafters every time she made a point. This woman's message is extremely popular and any candidate should be picking up on that.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Seriously.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)lose. I think she knows that and the fact that she's rallying people to the left may force the candidates we are forced to accept go to the left. If it's a strategy, it may work.
Marr
(20,317 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Been there, done that, got the free T shirt (two, actually) and the Christmas cards from the White House. Though, a year or two after i stopped donating, I began getting the cheaper version. Now I get none.
Can't buy me love? Wrong!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Wonder if it has anything to do with me asking for my donation back...
merrily
(45,251 posts)I've given away the T shirts and I'm keeping the cards to make sure I don't forget again.
Otherwise, I'd try to make up for your not getting any.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)... and who could blame her?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Who could blame her? Not I. But I wouldn't be a politician. Many politicians dream of being President.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)... let alone president.
merrily
(45,251 posts)However, I did not say many Harvard professors dream of being President. I said many politicians do.
At some point, Warren did obviously dream of being of a politician. And she is one, and a very popular one, whom many people have been begging to run for POTUS.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)But somewhere in the back of my mind I thought I saw an interview with her where she said she never pictured herself in politics.
merrily
(45,251 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I think when she didn't get the CFP slot she was persuaded that running for senate was the only avenue to change open to her. But she has been pretty emphatic about not running for President. I'd vote for her in a heartbeat, of course.
But I cannot blame her for not wanting to due the run for (and win) the presidency. I am passionate about politics too, but I sure as hell would not want to be president. Sounds like 4/8 of hell to me.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I think when she didn't get the CFP slot she was persuaded that running for senate was the only avenue to change open to her.
Only avenue? She had plenty of options other than politics.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)At least I haven't seen any.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Also evidence that, in general, the party tries to avoid primaries.
There have been statements made by Schumer and Brown and an article written VandenHeuvel and others. Lots of comments from Sanders and others about a coronation, and so on.
I've posted some links on DU. You can search DU for them. Or google the net.
No evidence to support anything you've posted on this thread that I've seen, though.
Also, I think it's funny that someone who has been telling me what Warren's dreams and thoughts are and are not and who implies that people who claim Hillary is not economically liberal are probably sexist is all about proof, but only for posts made by others.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Just like the fact that Wall Street democrats donate to HRC doesn't mean she is not a champion for inequality.
Just like the fact that Bill believes something doesn't mean Hiliary shares his view.
Just like the fact that other democrats think other people should run in the primary doesn't mean HRC is "helping others to make a decision not to run."
And there is certainly no evidence that democrats don't like presidential primaries. They are historically robust except in the case that a sitting president is running for reelection.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Maher offered a million if she did
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Sienna86
(2,149 posts)Will the Clinton campaign see the same donations? Does it matter?
tularetom
(23,664 posts)She's gonna get bazillions of bucks from her corporate buddies on Wall Street, and the MIC she tried to help out as SecOState, and the fanatical Israel supporters.
And then if elected, she's gonna turn around and push for policies that rein in Wall Street, the MIC and Israel.
And if you believe that,
merrily
(45,251 posts)of the Bunker Hill Monument to boot. It's evocative of the monument and of an open book, a history book, I imagine. Yet, it's very modern-looking, too. Any takers?
demwing
(16,916 posts)Great, the check's in the mail
merrily
(45,251 posts)keep peons like us invested in the campaign, so we vote and, hopefully, help GOTV.
And, cosmetically, it's certainly much better than all big donations and no volunteers.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)*does not apply in all jurisdictions
Lochloosa
(16,068 posts)I was going to say you could in Florida..
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)I know Hillary will be the only choice after everything is said and done, but damn this speaks to me on so many levels.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)When Warren learns to utter a few more words other than "Wall Street Bad" then maybe she, too, can run for President!
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I'm not bashing Warren. But this video is bunk as far as I am concerned.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I feel like this is 2008 all over again, where lots of folks at DU described Obama as you wanted to see him rather than what he really was - which as we have seen is not super liberal, particularly on economic issues. I'm not bashing him, but during that campaign it was clear to me that HRC was much more liberal than he was/is.
I'd like to hear specifics on this issue from people. What evidence to you have that HRC is not a liberal on the issue of income inequality? It seems to me that lots of folks just conflate her views with Bill's when in reality she has always been much more liberal than him.
I'm willing to be wrong and listen to other viewpoints supported by evidence. But at first glance it seems sexist to me now and did back in 2008 that people conflate Bill's views with hers. She is definitely capable of independent thought (as one can clearly see if they read historical accounts of Bill Clinton's presidency).
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/11/why-wall-street-loves-hillary-112782.html#.VSg8CvnF_50
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clintons-complex-corporate-ties-1424403002
http://billmoyers.com/2014/11/12/hillary-clinton-wall-streets-pick-2016/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/harold-meyerson-helping-hillary-clinton-stand-up-to-wall-street/2014/10/30/2765a1fa-604f-11e4-9f3a-7e28799e0549_story.html
http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/06/opinions/zelizer-democrats-vs-wall-street/
Any other questions?
http://fortune.com/2014/12/04/warren-buffett-hillary-clinton/
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-12-04/warren-buffett-bets-big-on-hillary-clinton
http://www.businessinsider.com/warren-buffett-didnt-realize-his-hillary-clinton-contribution-went-to-a-super-pac-2015-4
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/warren-buffett-didnt-realize-his-hillary-clinton-contribution-went-to-a-super-pac-2015-4#ixzz3WwXpZ311
Sure, Warren thought you could give $25,000 to any political campaign. Right? I mean, when you're used to dealing in billions, what's a few thousand between friends?
merrily
(45,251 posts)And even though she kinds sorta implied anyone with your position had to be conflating her views with Bill's and therefore was sexist?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Seems to be in the OP, and I am respectfully asking where that meme comes from. All I got in response was a bunch of "wall street and Buffet donate to her."
Yeah, but just like they would to the campaign of any Democrat that gets the nomination or leads in the polling. Does that mean you won't vote for any Democrat in the general that Buffet or any person on Wall street donates to? Because it's inevitable.
merrily
(45,251 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Yes, clearly. Hopefully well delineated. As in "seems to me..."
So I am looking for evidence that HER views would lead someone to think she does not share the typical liberal view about income inequality (and not the views of people that donate to democrats). Everything I know about her history leads me to believe she is on the correct side of that issue. But like I said, I am willing to be convinced if someone can point to words or actions of hers that I might have missed.
And also, she is NOT Bill. And it's unfair to her for people to extrapolate things Clinton or thinks and conflate them her viewpoints. For instance, she is against the keystone pipeline and Bill is for it. They are two different people. What would you call the belief and assumption that she must share her husbands views on everything by default?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Buffet is a Democrat and a billionaire. Same with lots of people on Wall St. They are going to support the Democrat who they think has the best chance of winning. Regardless of who it is.
So I wouldn't base my vote on who they support. And I wouldn't hold it against any Dem candidate either. Obama took a lot of money from unions, but he didn't do much to support them.
I am not convinced that HRC is some sort of right wing oligarch (all of the sudden, to boot) based on who donates to her campaign. That just doesn't make sense to me.
Response to MaggieD (Reply #30)
merrily This message was self-deleted by its author.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)LOVE IT!
Stellar
(5,644 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Thanks, and I just died laughing
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)K&R
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)LOVE it!
treestar
(82,383 posts)those two would vote Republican