Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I just DIED LAUGHING (Original Post) XemaSab Apr 2015 OP
K & R L0oniX Apr 2015 #1
SHE'S NOT RUNNING! merrily Apr 2015 #2
That's why the url begins with "draft". Dawgs Apr 2015 #5
yes, I know. merrily Apr 2015 #6
It was a joke. bvar22 Apr 2015 #10
Could you start a draft to get me on the Dallas Cowboys? snooper2 Apr 2015 #11
I'm on it. Chellee Apr 2015 #38
Not smart. tazkcmo Apr 2015 #76
Best news I've heard in a week. Spread the word, Hillary's not running! A Simple Game Apr 2015 #13
You won't let me play with the cool kids, even one time? I'm telling! merrily Apr 2015 #39
She does say that, donnasgirl Apr 2015 #15
I don't know why anyone would complain about writing in a Dem in a Dem primary. merrily Apr 2015 #37
That's what I've decided JimDandy Apr 2015 #79
lol! Marr Apr 2015 #34
lol ... Grey Poupon ,,, nicely done. eom Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2015 #3
Can someone tell me the name of this background music? mac56 Apr 2015 #4
Luigi Boccherini's Minuetto Brother Buzz Apr 2015 #9
Is your zombie corpse posting now? Cleita Apr 2015 #7
Me? XemaSab Apr 2015 #46
I'm joking. You said you DIED LAUGHING. Cleita Apr 2015 #48
I get it XemaSab Apr 2015 #67
Well he yuiyoshida Apr 2015 #8
DURec, bvar22 Apr 2015 #12
Oh, that's ripe! Eleanors38 Apr 2015 #14
Love it. Sienna86 Apr 2015 #16
Did you see Elizabeth on Jon Stewart last night. Cleita Apr 2015 #18
She would win the Democratic nomination and go on to win the general in a landslide. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #21
They would do something to her like the Dean scream to discredit her and make her Cleita Apr 2015 #23
It'll only make them *talk* that way during primary season. /nt Marr Apr 2015 #35
Sadly, I agree I'm done voting for POTUS on the basis of campaign rhetoric. merrily Apr 2015 #40
What the hell? I didn't get any T-shirts or Xmas cards. cui bono Apr 2015 #75
I got two T shirts, two or three of the good cards and one or two of the cheaper ones. merrily Apr 2015 #80
Maybe, but she doesn't appear to want that MaggieD Apr 2015 #32
I think she's had help not wanting it. merrily Apr 2015 #42
I don't think Warren dreamed of being a politician MaggieD Apr 2015 #49
I know you'll understand that I can't put any stock in someone's view of Warren's dreams. merrily Apr 2015 #50
I could be wrong.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #56
If she did say that, at some point, that changed. merrily Apr 2015 #58
Yes, clearly... MaggieD Apr 2015 #61
We've gone full circle: I think she had help not wanting to run. merrily Apr 2015 #62
Meh, there is no evidence to support that notion MaggieD Apr 2015 #64
There is evidence that challengers to Hillary are not desired. merrily Apr 2015 #65
Again, I don't see evidence of that... MaggieD Apr 2015 #66
On Maher last night she made it absolutely clear, she aint running NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #77
We all need a candidate who inspires us. We should accept nothing less. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #22
Like Obama inspired people? MaggieD Apr 2015 #33
Nothing is wrong with inspiring people. No doubt, Hillary will try to do that. merrily Apr 2015 #44
President Obama's campaign had many $5 and $10 donations. Sienna86 Apr 2015 #17
Probably not and no tularetom Apr 2015 #25
That one's been bought and sold so often, it's shopworn. I have a shiny one for sale, with a view merrily Apr 2015 #47
Wow, that's a shiny bridge, would you take a check? demwing Apr 2015 #72
The big money is the soft money. The small donations and volunteering helps merrily Apr 2015 #43
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Oh, baby! Enthusiast Apr 2015 #19
If you died you can't vote* ashling Apr 2015 #20
Damn..you put the little * thingy... Lochloosa Apr 2015 #24
This is pretty good! d_legendary1 Apr 2015 #26
K & R Thespian2 Apr 2015 #27
So Funny I Forgot to Laugh! Gamecock Lefty Apr 2015 #28
.... LiberalLovinLug Apr 2015 #29
+1000 MaggieD Apr 2015 #31
It is pretty pathetic. nt stevenleser Apr 2015 #36
On the plus side, she doesn't say things like "So Funny I Forgot to Laugh." merrily Apr 2015 #51
What, specifically, makes you believe HRC is not liberal on the issue of income inequality? MaggieD Apr 2015 #30
OK. Savannahmann Apr 2015 #45
Wow. You did all that before asking her to prove a single sweeping claim she made? merrily Apr 2015 #53
From my POV, the sweeping claim... MaggieD Apr 2015 #57
There were several in your post. merrily Apr 2015 #59
Several what? Opinions? MaggieD Apr 2015 #63
Well here is the thing about Buffet and Wall St.... MaggieD Apr 2015 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author merrily Apr 2015 #52
haha. exactly! nt m-lekktor Apr 2015 #41
Yes! obxhead Apr 2015 #54
Love it! nt Stellar Apr 2015 #60
LMAO also. GoneFishin Apr 2015 #68
I just cross posted this in the EW group Autumn Apr 2015 #69
Almost missed this one! Huge R & K!! RiverLover Apr 2015 #70
Nailed it MissDeeds Apr 2015 #71
Ba-ZAM!! hifiguy Apr 2015 #73
how dumb treestar Apr 2015 #74
A republican or Hillary , it's a no lose situation for them. bowens43 Apr 2015 #78

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
76. Not smart.
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 05:01 PM
Apr 2015

You have to think this through. First, running back? You'll get hurt silly! Large and strong men lift weights all day and practice trying to kill running backs. Second, for the Cowboys? You have a problem with post season bonuses? You want to be the back up punter for the Seahawks or Patriots. Safe and pays well. Good luck.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
13. Best news I've heard in a week. Spread the word, Hillary's not running!
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 02:07 PM
Apr 2015

Smart move on her part with the polls showing her dropping like a stone.

donnasgirl

(656 posts)
15. She does say that,
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 02:07 PM
Apr 2015

but she is still going to receive my vote, I will write her in. I know I will catch hell from some people here but I simply will not and can not back a Corporatist in any way shape or form.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
37. I don't know why anyone would complain about writing in a Dem in a Dem primary.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 04:48 PM
Apr 2015

A couple of days ago, a relative said she was writing in Warren, too. (My whole family is Democratic, except for one member of the younger generation. We can't figure out why he strayed.)

I forgot to ask her whether she meant the primary or the general. She doesn't post here, so DU rules do not apply to her.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6485759

Sienna86

(2,149 posts)
16. Love it.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 02:09 PM
Apr 2015

I personally need a candidate who understands the middle class economic crunch, the struggles of families to pay college tuition, what a gallon of milk costs, and doesn't want us to get screwed by Wall Street and big banks. I need a candidate who inspires me.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
18. Did you see Elizabeth on Jon Stewart last night.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 02:15 PM
Apr 2015

She touched on all those points clearly like she does. The audience was cheering her to the rafters every time she made a point. This woman's message is extremely popular and any candidate should be picking up on that.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
23. They would do something to her like the Dean scream to discredit her and make her
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 02:26 PM
Apr 2015

lose. I think she knows that and the fact that she's rallying people to the left may force the candidates we are forced to accept go to the left. If it's a strategy, it may work.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
40. Sadly, I agree I'm done voting for POTUS on the basis of campaign rhetoric.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:00 PM
Apr 2015

Been there, done that, got the free T shirt (two, actually) and the Christmas cards from the White House. Though, a year or two after i stopped donating, I began getting the cheaper version. Now I get none.

Can't buy me love? Wrong!

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
75. What the hell? I didn't get any T-shirts or Xmas cards.
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 04:52 PM
Apr 2015

Wonder if it has anything to do with me asking for my donation back...

merrily

(45,251 posts)
80. I got two T shirts, two or three of the good cards and one or two of the cheaper ones.
Sun Apr 12, 2015, 07:00 AM
Apr 2015

I've given away the T shirts and I'm keeping the cards to make sure I don't forget again.

Otherwise, I'd try to make up for your not getting any.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
42. I think she's had help not wanting it.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:02 PM
Apr 2015

Who could blame her? Not I. But I wouldn't be a politician. Many politicians dream of being President.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
50. I know you'll understand that I can't put any stock in someone's view of Warren's dreams.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 06:10 PM
Apr 2015

However, I did not say many Harvard professors dream of being President. I said many politicians do.

At some point, Warren did obviously dream of being of a politician. And she is one, and a very popular one, whom many people have been begging to run for POTUS.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
56. I could be wrong....
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 08:34 PM
Apr 2015

But somewhere in the back of my mind I thought I saw an interview with her where she said she never pictured herself in politics.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
61. Yes, clearly...
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 08:42 PM
Apr 2015

I think when she didn't get the CFP slot she was persuaded that running for senate was the only avenue to change open to her. But she has been pretty emphatic about not running for President. I'd vote for her in a heartbeat, of course.

But I cannot blame her for not wanting to due the run for (and win) the presidency. I am passionate about politics too, but I sure as hell would not want to be president. Sounds like 4/8 of hell to me.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
62. We've gone full circle: I think she had help not wanting to run.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 08:46 PM
Apr 2015
I think when she didn't get the CFP slot she was persuaded that running for senate was the only avenue to change open to her.


Only avenue? She had plenty of options other than politics.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
65. There is evidence that challengers to Hillary are not desired.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 09:14 PM
Apr 2015

Also evidence that, in general, the party tries to avoid primaries.

There have been statements made by Schumer and Brown and an article written VandenHeuvel and others. Lots of comments from Sanders and others about a coronation, and so on.

I've posted some links on DU. You can search DU for them. Or google the net.

No evidence to support anything you've posted on this thread that I've seen, though.

Also, I think it's funny that someone who has been telling me what Warren's dreams and thoughts are and are not and who implies that people who claim Hillary is not economically liberal are probably sexist is all about proof, but only for posts made by others.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
66. Again, I don't see evidence of that...
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 09:56 PM
Apr 2015

Just like the fact that Wall Street democrats donate to HRC doesn't mean she is not a champion for inequality.

Just like the fact that Bill believes something doesn't mean Hiliary shares his view.

Just like the fact that other democrats think other people should run in the primary doesn't mean HRC is "helping others to make a decision not to run."

And there is certainly no evidence that democrats don't like presidential primaries. They are historically robust except in the case that a sitting president is running for reelection.

Sienna86

(2,149 posts)
17. President Obama's campaign had many $5 and $10 donations.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 02:15 PM
Apr 2015

Will the Clinton campaign see the same donations? Does it matter?

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
25. Probably not and no
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 02:48 PM
Apr 2015

She's gonna get bazillions of bucks from her corporate buddies on Wall Street, and the MIC she tried to help out as SecOState, and the fanatical Israel supporters.

And then if elected, she's gonna turn around and push for policies that rein in Wall Street, the MIC and Israel.

And if you believe that,

merrily

(45,251 posts)
47. That one's been bought and sold so often, it's shopworn. I have a shiny one for sale, with a view
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:38 PM
Apr 2015

of the Bunker Hill Monument to boot. It's evocative of the monument and of an open book, a history book, I imagine. Yet, it's very modern-looking, too. Any takers?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
43. The big money is the soft money. The small donations and volunteering helps
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:04 PM
Apr 2015

keep peons like us invested in the campaign, so we vote and, hopefully, help GOTV.

And, cosmetically, it's certainly much better than all big donations and no volunteers.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
26. This is pretty good!
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 02:51 PM
Apr 2015

I know Hillary will be the only choice after everything is said and done, but damn this speaks to me on so many levels.

Gamecock Lefty

(700 posts)
28. So Funny I Forgot to Laugh!
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 03:38 PM
Apr 2015

When Warren learns to utter a few more words other than "Wall Street Bad" then maybe she, too, can run for President!

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
30. What, specifically, makes you believe HRC is not liberal on the issue of income inequality?
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 04:17 PM
Apr 2015

I feel like this is 2008 all over again, where lots of folks at DU described Obama as you wanted to see him rather than what he really was - which as we have seen is not super liberal, particularly on economic issues. I'm not bashing him, but during that campaign it was clear to me that HRC was much more liberal than he was/is.

I'd like to hear specifics on this issue from people. What evidence to you have that HRC is not a liberal on the issue of income inequality? It seems to me that lots of folks just conflate her views with Bill's when in reality she has always been much more liberal than him.

I'm willing to be wrong and listen to other viewpoints supported by evidence. But at first glance it seems sexist to me now and did back in 2008 that people conflate Bill's views with hers. She is definitely capable of independent thought (as one can clearly see if they read historical accounts of Bill Clinton's presidency).

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
45. OK.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:15 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/wall-street-republicans-hillary-clinton-2016-106070_Page2.html

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/11/why-wall-street-loves-hillary-112782.html#.VSg8CvnF_50

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clintons-complex-corporate-ties-1424403002

http://billmoyers.com/2014/11/12/hillary-clinton-wall-streets-pick-2016/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/harold-meyerson-helping-hillary-clinton-stand-up-to-wall-street/2014/10/30/2765a1fa-604f-11e4-9f3a-7e28799e0549_story.html

Problem is, some of Clinton’s long-standing supporters run those big banks. On Monday, at a campaign stop in New York, the Democrats’ presumptive presidential front-runner rephrased. “Our economy grows when businesses and entrepreneurs create good-paying jobs here in America, where workers and families are empowered to build from the bottom up and the middle out.”


http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/06/opinions/zelizer-democrats-vs-wall-street/

Any other questions?

http://fortune.com/2014/12/04/warren-buffett-hillary-clinton/

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-12-04/warren-buffett-bets-big-on-hillary-clinton

http://www.businessinsider.com/warren-buffett-didnt-realize-his-hillary-clinton-contribution-went-to-a-super-pac-2015-4

Billionaire Warren Buffett, a staunch critic of the power of super PACS in US politics, just admitted he didn't realize his $25,000 contribution to Ready for Hillary was helping fund a super PAC.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/warren-buffett-didnt-realize-his-hillary-clinton-contribution-went-to-a-super-pac-2015-4#ixzz3WwXpZ311


Sure, Warren thought you could give $25,000 to any political campaign. Right? I mean, when you're used to dealing in billions, what's a few thousand between friends?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
53. Wow. You did all that before asking her to prove a single sweeping claim she made?
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 06:18 PM
Apr 2015

And even though she kinds sorta implied anyone with your position had to be conflating her views with Bill's and therefore was sexist?

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
57. From my POV, the sweeping claim...
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 08:38 PM
Apr 2015

Seems to be in the OP, and I am respectfully asking where that meme comes from. All I got in response was a bunch of "wall street and Buffet donate to her."

Yeah, but just like they would to the campaign of any Democrat that gets the nomination or leads in the polling. Does that mean you won't vote for any Democrat in the general that Buffet or any person on Wall street donates to? Because it's inevitable.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
63. Several what? Opinions?
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 08:54 PM
Apr 2015

Yes, clearly. Hopefully well delineated. As in "seems to me..."

it seems sexist to me now and did back in 2008 that people conflate Bill's views with hers.


So I am looking for evidence that HER views would lead someone to think she does not share the typical liberal view about income inequality (and not the views of people that donate to democrats). Everything I know about her history leads me to believe she is on the correct side of that issue. But like I said, I am willing to be convinced if someone can point to words or actions of hers that I might have missed.

And also, she is NOT Bill. And it's unfair to her for people to extrapolate things Clinton or thinks and conflate them her viewpoints. For instance, she is against the keystone pipeline and Bill is for it. They are two different people. What would you call the belief and assumption that she must share her husbands views on everything by default?
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
55. Well here is the thing about Buffet and Wall St....
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 08:32 PM
Apr 2015

Buffet is a Democrat and a billionaire. Same with lots of people on Wall St. They are going to support the Democrat who they think has the best chance of winning. Regardless of who it is.

So I wouldn't base my vote on who they support. And I wouldn't hold it against any Dem candidate either. Obama took a lot of money from unions, but he didn't do much to support them.

I am not convinced that HRC is some sort of right wing oligarch (all of the sudden, to boot) based on who donates to her campaign. That just doesn't make sense to me.

Response to MaggieD (Reply #30)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I just DIED LAUGHING