Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 12:01 PM Apr 2015

You see, whether it is Brown being executed or Walter Scott, the cop gets this benefit of the doubt

...

What do I mean?

You see, the ONLY reason the DOJ couldn't file charges against Darren Wilson was based on the evidence, they could NOT prove Wilson was NOT in fear for his life. (this is the benefit a cop gets that nobody else getts)

Why?

Because there was conflicting testimony and NO video. So all he has to say is even though the kid was unarmed, he was afraid for his life.

SAME exact thing this other cop TRIED to say about Walter Scott, but there was video.

That video by the way, all you have to do is turn Scott around, facing the cop, move him maybe 5 feet closer to the cop and you have the Brown Wilson deal, still far away when being shot and unarmed and not posing a threat.

Same thing...different day

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You see, whether it is Brown being executed or Walter Scott, the cop gets this benefit of the doubt (Original Post) NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 OP
George Zimmerman got the same benefit of the doubt Bjorn Against Apr 2015 #1
Yep...we cant even get some folks around here to agree that Michael Brown's dead mutilated body NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #2
So in other words NobodyHere Apr 2015 #5
No that is not what I said at all Bjorn Against Apr 2015 #6
The end result is the same NobodyHere Apr 2015 #7
... of course, especially when there's mounds and mounds of descrepencies like Wilson and Z uponit7771 Apr 2015 #9
Discrepancies are why we have TRIALS, too bad Michael Brown's dead body, his head with NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #14
No, I am saying that the victim is innocent until proven guilty Bjorn Against Apr 2015 #11
Strawman, the concept of plausibility CAN BE injected into peoples decisions... that's a known know uponit7771 Apr 2015 #8
Lots of people get this benefit RealityAdvocate Apr 2015 #3
Of course whites, but cops can use the excuse of personal or public safety to kill anyone, anywhere NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #4
Cops have a tough job....I couldn't do it. nt clarice Apr 2015 #10
Did I miss the trial? nt B2G Apr 2015 #12
NO trial...EXACTLY NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #13
I'm talking about Scott B2G Apr 2015 #15
Oh, I see...Too bad Brown doesnt get a trial in your world... NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #16
He got a Grand Jury and a DOJ investigation B2G Apr 2015 #17
GJ was a completen joke, the fix was in...DOJ ONLY ONLY ONLY decided they NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #18
What should Brown have been tried for? pintobean Apr 2015 #19
BROWN IS A VICTIM, TRIALS ARE FOR THE VICTIMS NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #20

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
1. George Zimmerman got the same benefit of the doubt
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 12:13 PM
Apr 2015

What needs to happen is that the concept of innocent until proven guilty needs to apply to shooting victims.

If the killer can not prove that the person whose life they took was guilty then it should be presumed that they took the life of an innocent person.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
2. Yep...we cant even get some folks around here to agree that Michael Brown's dead mutilated body
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 12:16 PM
Apr 2015

deserved at least a trial

He was unarmed.

I mean, oh shit, lets stop fucking pretending who is and isnt full of shit about race...i cant call them racists on DU even if they are

get in trouble that way

 

NobodyHere

(2,810 posts)
5. So in other words
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 12:48 PM
Apr 2015

You want to take away the concept of "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" from accused murderers?

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
6. No that is not what I said at all
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 01:23 PM
Apr 2015

The state would still have to prove that the accused killed the person they are accused of killing.

 

NobodyHere

(2,810 posts)
7. The end result is the same
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 03:17 PM
Apr 2015

You want to put the burden on the defendant to prove that s/he didn't break the law.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
14. Discrepancies are why we have TRIALS, too bad Michael Brown's dead body, his head with
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 04:27 PM
Apr 2015

kill shots in it, didnt warrant a trial, eh!

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
11. No, I am saying that the victim is innocent until proven guilty
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 04:01 PM
Apr 2015

If there is no proof that the victim posed a threat then it should be considered a crime to take their life.

uponit7771

(90,364 posts)
8. Strawman, the concept of plausibility CAN BE injected into peoples decisions... that's a known know
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 03:22 PM
Apr 2015

... Zimmerman getting closer to a threat he ID'd and that was running away from him and then killing said threat because of it's reaction to Zimmerman chasing him... is reason enough to doubt Zimmermans word

 

RealityAdvocate

(106 posts)
3. Lots of people get this benefit
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 12:18 PM
Apr 2015

This is how the system is supposed to work. Unfortunately whites tend to get this benefit more than minorities. And cops more than the general public.

Cops get the system we deserve.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
4. Of course whites, but cops can use the excuse of personal or public safety to kill anyone, anywhere
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 12:20 PM
Apr 2015

at anytime.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
18. GJ was a completen joke, the fix was in...DOJ ONLY ONLY ONLY decided they
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:35 PM
Apr 2015

could not, without video, prove Wilson didnt fear for his life


We really are wasting our time, you and me

Practically the ENTIRE Black and Latino community of America agrees with me, all Fifty million or so of them, and they agree with me because they LIVE this life and know what the hell they are talking about

The debate is over, we know what is happening...they know

you can keep denying it if you want, if it makes you feel better

THE SAME GRAND JURY THAT WAS INCORRECTLY TOLD A COP CAN SHOOT SOMEONE RUNNING AWAY

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
20. BROWN IS A VICTIM, TRIALS ARE FOR THE VICTIMS
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:39 PM
Apr 2015

you dont give a shit about these victims anyway, so why are you fucking with me???

some of us no longer have a sense of humor on this topic

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You see, whether it is Br...