General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCNN: "Walter Scott was shot dead like a runaway slave"
:large one could say that Slager shot Scott like a dog. But then again, dogs usually are not treated this badly
--- But the man was shot like a runaway slave.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/08/opinions/love-walter-scott/
Response to kpete (Original post)
Post removed
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)ps
the LAST thing that cop cares about is whether the man's family is getting child support or not
the VERY LAST
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)statement about the current child support laws. It's extremely poorly written.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)there is always a reason why they just had to shoot and kill them black men and kids
they kill black kids too
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Journal Archives
Iris
(15,662 posts)The Democratic party is anti - intellectual?
zonkers
(5,865 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)the ULTIMATE POINT
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)onecaliberal
(32,878 posts)FarPoint
(12,422 posts)I believe there needs to be a Standard of Practice for all Law Enforcement... Additionally, have a license to be a LEO like nurses for example.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)brush
(53,801 posts)the cop is 25-years-old and certainly with his academy training, physical fitness and age advantage should be able to chase and subdue the twice as old, 50-year-old man without shooting him in the back.
Duh . . . his name and address are on his license. YOU CAN FIND HIM WITHOUT HAVING TO SHOOT HIM.
Guess chasing and catching an unarmed suspect on foot is out of style in police circles nowadays.
onecaliberal
(32,878 posts)Response to NoJusticeNoPeace (Reply #3)
ladjf This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to NoJusticeNoPeace (Reply #3)
Liberal_Stalwart71 This message was self-deleted by its author.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Cops aren't allowed to shoot people dead when they don't pose a threat.
If the child support comment is about having an arrest warrant out, the penalty for that is not death (see above).
If the child support comment is on parents having to pay for the care and raising of their own children, that is how it should be. While I do think some payment judgments make it next to impossible to keep up and the penalties are sometimes (not even close to mostly) heavy, one is not a slave to them when one knowingly has children to support.
I don't know where you stand on the issue, and it really has nothing to do with the OP.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)in his first week. We had a pretty good-sized mod consensus, and someone overturned it in the middle of the night with a long-winded post. (Mods used to be able to do that back in the day, and open it back up for discussion) I still think that mod was a fucking freeper. Anyway he was allowed to think he was being all slick for years, only quite a few of us knew better. What a waste of space that dude was on DU. I still take pride that banned his lame ass by his 6th post. Ugh.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)there are many who game the jury system
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)from the moment he stepped in the door.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,679 posts)Like Forest Gump that is all I'm saying about that.
On Thu Apr 9, 2015, 07:30 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
specifically...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6482043
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Suggesting that it's okay to kill somebody who is behind on child support is way over the line
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Apr 9, 2015, 07:36 PM, and the Jury voted 7-0 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: WTF??? Hide it!
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Being a deadbeat dad is not relevant to the story.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Pissing on a dead man, eh?
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and slavery.
Which also merits a hide.
Cheers.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I'd seen his posts against police brutality and killing of unarmed black men, so I took his comment more as an MRA view that was an irrelevant distraction. In any case, the post was unclear and open to more than one interpretation.
Hong Kong Cavalier
(4,573 posts)But I don't disagree with the jury results myself.
Hong Kong Cavalier
(4,573 posts)It wasn't hidden. I eventually just put him on ignore because it was clear the mods weren't going to do anything.
Thanks for your effort to cut him off before he actually got rooted.
Hekate
(90,756 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Seems he'll be taking a timeout.
Based on the posts I've read by him, he seems to have taken a wrong turn to land here.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... may give him a new perspective.
(Ya never know.
mcar
(42,358 posts)Gee, maybe some of those runaway slaves knocked out an overseer to get away; or stole food to survive on their journey.
Let's be specific, for sure. Any alleged crime deserves the death penalty?
qwlauren35
(6,148 posts)The murdered man has been a criminal or mentally ill. Is that a reason or justification for murder? For back child support? For drunk driving? For shoplifting? For holding a broomstick or a screwdriver?
If you're looking for reasons to justify killing these men, you'll find them. Just as the cops did. Because they were criminals, because they ran, because they struggled...
So please, just go to gofundme and put in your dollars for Officer Slater. He killed some creep who didn't pay his child support and the world is better off. Except his ex is not going to get anything now... it's hard to pay back child support when you're dead.
appalachiablue
(41,159 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)That was valuable property and you could be liable.
Black lives had value.
OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)As best can be determined, in 1861, the average value of a slave was $400. Depending on how you calculate it, in today's money, that's $12,000 to $170,000.
My Great-great-grandaddy owned 83 slaves in the Wilkinson County, Mississippi, 1860 federal slave census. At an average value of $400, that's over $33,000 -- that's a LOT of money in 1861.
Here's a good article discussing the worth of a slave.
One point this article makes is the value of a slave was: Value of what his/her work produced MINUS what it cost to support the slave. Because slaves received the bare minimum of food, clothing, housing, and medical care, the costs were minimal. Compared to free labor, slaves produced more because they could be compelled to produce 24/7/365 whereas free labor wants time off.
I think I am correct in saying that beginning in the early 1840's, the most valuable export from Virginia was slaves who were exported to other states, mostly to the deep South.
While it's true slaves were beaten, tortured, and sometimes killed, they generally were kept alive because of their monetary value. A slave owner could use the value of his slaves as collateral for loans to support his plantation, his sons enrolled in Eastern universities, his wife's shopping trips to Europe -- I know -- I have plantation journals from my g-g-granddaddy and from his cousin's sugar plantation in Louisiana.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)I was born and raised there and the old guard and their children still pine for the idea of the plantation. It's a sickness that is dying a long and hard death even after 150 years.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)concept.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)They were not only valuable to their owners, there was a reward for the bounty hunters...
GusBob
(7,286 posts)It's a metaphor. Think about it
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)but semantics aside, I appreciate the CNN guy's point...
GusBob
(7,286 posts)Think harder
knows what he is talking about.
You might want to back off a bit.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Perhaps you could kindly explain it to me...
Please give me today's lesson in Black History...
Rex
(65,616 posts)In that one way.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Besides, I suggest there was a "bounty" on this man's head. But by another name. Broken tail light$200? More?
No insuranceGod knows how much. $500?
You know what I meanthose fees that were discovered to be an economic cash cow for Ferguson, charged for minor violations on mostly Black residents. There were multiple warrants out on the majority of Ferguson's Black people.
Can't pay the "bounty"?then go to jail. (Back into chains.)
And that murdering cop was definitely a hunter and a "bounty hunter" at that.
It is the twenty first century version of slavery.
libodem
(19,288 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)
.tail light excuse for stopping him seems like one of those Ferguson type ploys where Black people get shaken down by a corrupt court system for exorbitant fees.
There has to be an investigation by the DOJ of this police department as well. We know the same pattern of poor-tax abuse will exist. 'Cause this isn't just about the murdering cop who felt free to behave this way. It's about the Jim Crow that never went away.
MysticHuman
(219 posts)The truth hurts sometimes... and this truth hits you hard.
RIP Walter Scott.... may your death be a turning point in the awareness of our countries consciousness.