Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,127 posts)
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:04 PM Apr 2015

Why must we humiliate those in poverty?

By Dana Milbank

Rick Brattin, a young Republican state representative in Missouri, has come up with an innovative new way to humiliate the poor in his state. Call it the surf-and-turf law.

Brattin has introduced House Bill 813, making it illegal for food-stamp recipients to use their benefits “to purchase cookies, chips, energy drinks, soft drinks, seafood or steak.”

“I have seen people purchasing filet mignons and crab legs” with electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards, the legislator explained, according to The Washington Post's Roberto A. Ferdman. “When I can't afford it on my pay, I don't want people on the taxpayer's dime to afford those kinds of foods either.”

Never mind that few can afford filet mignon on a less-than-$7-a-day food-stamp allotment; they're more likely to be buying chuck steak or canned tuna. This is less about public policy than about demeaning public-benefit recipients.

The surf-and-turf bill is one of a flurry of legislative proposals at the state and local level to dehumanize and even criminalize the poor as the country deals with the high-poverty hangover of the Great Recession.

http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20150409/OPINION04/150409142

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

2naSalit

(86,723 posts)
1. A couple possible reasons
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:18 PM
Apr 2015

and not mutually exclusive:

They think it gives them more "license" to look down at the impoverish - many are there as a result of their policies...

It satisfies their need to control those less able to defend against discrimination...

The "selected" think they have a supremacy edict and this is how they perceive their duty to those who "selected" them...

The "control-freak" mindset is justified in making certain discriminatory policies keep the poor poor so they can serve as the other side of the superiority paradigm... and a self-fulfilling prophecy of a sort.

For starters.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
2. If I had a dime
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:22 PM
Apr 2015

for every right wing shithead that claims he witnessed someone buying Filet and Crab Legs I'd probably be able to eat Filet and Crab Legs twice a week.


It's easy to call them out on it and catch them in a web of RW spun bullshit and we should do that at every opportunity.

raccoon

(31,112 posts)
14. Reminds me of a time when some RWNJ called into a local radio station and CLAIMED he gave a $20 to
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 03:01 PM
Apr 2015

one of those people holding a "work for food" sign. And said he later saw the guy buying beer.

I KNEW it was a lie. Most people wouldn't give them $20, to begin with. But to me it didn't pass the smell test.


ck4829

(35,079 posts)
6. "I can't afford it on my pay" Yeah right.
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:26 PM
Apr 2015

Something tells me this guy hasn't even been in a grocery store for a very long time.

Warpy

(111,312 posts)
7. Guilt and a reluctance to realize that for a few twists of luck
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:26 PM
Apr 2015

we would be in exactly the same position as the poor people we're trying to humiliate. Only by denying their essential humanity can we live with the fact that we're also teetering on the edge of the abyss most of the time.

Pretending they're an inferior species helps us feel safer. I guess humiliating them makes a legislator feel positively godlike. I suppose mandating nothing but oatmeal might cause him to rise to heaven immediately.

I don't know anyone on food stamps who eats chuck roast. Hamburger is a treat and it's stretched in a starchy casserole. Most of the meat I see at the checkout with a welfare cardholder is cheap cuts of pork and lunch meats. Beef is way out of the budget.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,189 posts)
8. Wait, do you mean State Representatitive Rick Brattin?
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:27 PM
Apr 2015

That State Representatitive Rick Brattin?

Because the only Rick Brattin I know is a State Representatitive Rick Brattin.

And there's no finer State Representatitive Rick Brattin than Missouri State Representatitive Rick Brattin!
.
.
.
.
.
.

For God's sake, our laws are being written by people who can't even spell their own job title:

https://www.facebook.com/rick.brattin.3?fref=ts

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,189 posts)
11. I bet a poor person once used auto-correct though.
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:34 PM
Apr 2015

Lazy bums. Shouldn't even be on computers. Don't they know how much computers cost?

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
9. Poor boy. He only gets an annual salary of $35,915.
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:28 PM
Apr 2015

Put him on food stamps with a food stamp income and see how many steaks he buys.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
12. Because we're afraid we'll be joining them...
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:39 PM
Apr 2015

...and hope vainly that our little rah-rahs for Team Haves will secure our positions.

Same reason we made fun of kids in grade school. Fear.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
13. Classic deflection
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 01:52 PM
Apr 2015

If any of us could see how much tax money Brattin has squandered on his own special snowflakeness, we might show up with pitchforks.

By deflecting the entire burden of deficits on the backs of the least of these, he takes the target off of himself.

I do hope for special places in hell for these sorts.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why must we humiliate tho...