General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"I clearly didn't lie. Here's how I know." . . . Please come CAPTION Bill O'Reilly!!!
Last edited Wed Apr 8, 2015, 09:37 AM - Edit history (1)
Bill (an infancy, youth and adolescence choking on soap) O'Reilly is saying: "Listen, I'm so truthful I would have told you I lied, but I never did, did I? . . . Not once! . . . That's like a hundred percent of the time!!!! . . .So I clearly didn't lie. . . . Just what's so wrong with that logic, I'd like to know."
*******************************************************************
Above CAPTION inspired by the following Media Matters story about their ebook on O'Reilly's obsessive need to embellish the realities of the world, in terms of his realities, it's more like buffering the polish on his favorite turd:
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/04/07/media-matters-presents-killing-truth-an-ebook-o/203182
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)skip fox
(19,359 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Liartainmnent should be banned, or at least not called "news", or come with warning labels.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)and since he didn't lie,..... and turned over anything that would have shown him to be a liar, clearly he is not a liar.
but no, you can't verify if he is lying, just take his word for it. Oooops, I forgot, he destroyed his server, but again, clearly since he did not turn anything over that showed any lying, obviously he did not lie. So stop lying about it.
Now, with that type of fucked up logic, should he be in charge of anything ?
skip fox
(19,359 posts)Should he be the representative for the credibility of a brand of thinking that elevates private interests over public good, superstition over science, military over peaceful solutions, etc., etc.?
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)Should a person who obviously is not being genuine, and who has a history of not being genuine and honest, but DOES have an ability to sidestep and deflect direct truthful answers be allowed to "inform" the public of thier version of the truth regarding both domestic and global policy ?
or should they just be crowned a presumed presidential nominee? Both parties would have the same answer, "my liar is telling the truth, and your liar is lying"
skip fox
(19,359 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)but the stuff that comes out of his mouth is even worse .
skip fox
(19,359 posts)God must have told me something wrong. . . . His ways are mysterious, ladies and gentlemen!"