Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 05:50 PM Apr 2015

FBI would rather prosecutors drop cases than disclose stingray details



FBI would rather prosecutors drop cases than disclose stingray details

New documents released by NYCLU shed light on Erie County's use of spying tool.

by Cyrus Farivar - Apr 7, 2015 4:35pm CDT


Not only is the FBI actively attempting to stop the public from knowing about stingrays, it has also forced local law enforcement agencies to stay quiet even in court and during public hearings, too.

An FBI agreement, published for the first time in unredacted form on Tuesday, clearly demonstrates the full extent of the agency’s attempt to quash public disclosure of information about stingrays. The most egregious example of this is language showing that the FBI would rather have a criminal case be dropped to protect secrecy surrounding the stingray.

Relatively little is known about how, exactly, stingrays, known more generically as cell-site simulators, are used by law enforcement agencies nationwide, although new documents have recently been released showing how they have been purchased and used in some limited instances. Worse still, cops have lied to courts about their use. Not only can stingrays be used to determine location by spoofing a cell tower, they can also be used to intercept calls and text messages. Typically, police deploy them without first obtaining a search warrant.

Ars previously published a redacted version of this document in February 2015, which had been acquired by the Minneapolis Star Tribune in December 2014. The fact that these two near-identical documents exist from the same year (2012) provides even more evidence that this language is boilerplate and likely exists in other agreements with other law enforcement agencies nationwide....

Read more:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/04/fbi-would-rather-prosecutors-drop-cases-than-disclose-stingray-details/#p3
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI would rather prosecutors drop cases than disclose stingray details (Original Post) think Apr 2015 OP
I understand why people hate and don't trust the government. nt Logical Apr 2015 #1
If it is being done in the line of civilian criminal law there is no right to secrecy. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #2

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
2. If it is being done in the line of civilian criminal law there is no right to secrecy.
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 05:55 PM
Apr 2015

We the people have absolute final say about the laws and the methods of their enforcement. We are the sole and final arbiters of government power.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI would rather prosecut...