Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 04:06 PM Apr 2015

2016 presidential candidates address inequality (sort of)

http://jimhightower.com/node/8589

At last, America's political leaders indicate that they now feel the pain of the poor and of the millions of working families slipping out of the middle class.

Congress had previously paid no attention to the ever-widening chasm between the rich and the rest of us, but it has recently emerged as a central issue for such Republican presidential contenders as Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Marco Rubio. They are publicly lamenting the wealth gap and – by gollies – proposing solutions. Alas, though, the "solution" proposed by each of them is not to provide help for those who've been knocked down, but to offer aid to the same corporate elites who've been knocking down the middle class and holding down the poor.

Specifically, their solution is to cut taxes on corporations and the rich, do away with environmental and labor protections, and cut or privatize government programs – from Head Start to Social Security – that ordinary people count on. For example, Sen. Rubio proposes to kill the food stamp program (even though the need for it is greater than ever) and redirect that money into what he calls a subsidy for low-wage workers. Does he think we have sucker-wrappers around our heads? That's not a subsidy for workers, but for low-wage employers. Why should taxpayers subsidize the poverty pay of profitable giants like McDonald's, rather than making them pay living wages and cover their own labor costs?

I guess we should count it as progress that candidates are at least having to admit that inequality is a problem, but come on – offering the same old failed, anti-government snake oil is an insult to the American people. Jeb Bush shows how vacuous their flim-flammery is by saying that, to address the ever-widening wealth and income gap, he'll "celebrate success and… cherish free enterprise." Gosh, what a comfort that'll be to America's hard-hit majority.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2016 presidential candidates address inequality (sort of) (Original Post) KamaAina Apr 2015 OP
They are appealing to middle class white america, and nobody else NoJusticeNoPeace Apr 2015 #1

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
1. They are appealing to middle class white america, and nobody else
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 04:14 PM
Apr 2015

Middle class white America, or upper middle class, doesn't give two shits about the poor or everybody having healthcare.

In fact, they believe the problem isnt profits by corps but poor people getting food stamps.



I am surrounded by republican voters right now, all of them middle class, so to speak, and I guarantee if I ask them which is a bigger problem, corporate welfare or individual welfare, every single one of them will say individual is the bigger problem.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2016 presidential candida...