General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould The Confederacy's Defeat Be A National Holiday?
In a speech one month ago, the first black president of the United States challenged millions of white Americans to resist the convenient allure of overlooking the countrys blemished moral record. It was a dual challenge, actuallyfirst to the classical understanding of American exceptionalism, but also to Americas persistent critics, who abjure the concept of exceptionalism altogether.
What greater expression of faith in the American experiment than this? President Barack Obama said. What greater form of patriotism is there than the belief that America is not yet finished, that we are strong enough to be self-critical, that each successive generation can look upon our imperfections and decide that it is in our power to remake this nation to more closely align with our highest ideals?
This was both a rejection of the fairytale America perpetuated by American conservatives, in which national virtue overwhelms sin, and a statement of faith in the countrys robust capacity for self-improvement. And he delivered it in Selma, Alabamaa Southern city whose folksy name evokes state-sanctioned, state-administered violence against black citizenson the fiftieth anniversary of Bloody Sunday. Selma would be a perverse venue for celebrating the Jingos exceptional America, but it was the perfect backdrop for Obamas more nuanced rendering: the convening point of the march to Montgomery, on a bridge named after Edmund Pettusa vicious white supremacist, who committed treason against the United States as a Confederate general, and later terrorized former slaves as an Alabama Klansman and Democratic Senator.
In the self-critical America of Obamas imagination, more people would know about the Edmund Pettus bridge and its namesake. The bridge itself wouldnt necessarily be renamed after Martin Luther King or John Lewis or another civil rights hero; because it is synonymous with racist violence, the bridge should bear Pettuss name eternally, with the explicit intent of linking the sins of the Confederacy to the sins of Jim Crow. But Obamas America would also reject the romantic reimagining of the Civil War, and thus, the myriad totems to the Confederacy and its leaders that pockmark the South, most of which don't share the Pettus bridge's incidental association with the struggle for civil rights.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121406/civil-war-150th-anniversary-confederacy-defeat-should-be-holiday
The answer is YES. And I'm a Southerner, btw. We should celebrate the fall of traitors to the Union.
And when the current round of NRAGOPteahadist traitors lose their grip on Congress, state houses, and the majority of governor's seats, we should celebrate that victory as well.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)We are so behind Europe in national holidays. Of course over there they actually get them off or are paid fairly for them.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)used to burn crosses (I think some racist still do), and let people chip away at the big Confederate carving on the side of the mountain. It would be cathartic.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)If we need the "holiday" at all.
TeamPooka
(24,232 posts)meow2u3
(24,764 posts)So what if the neo-Confederates get their undies in a wad. The more they whine and the louder they scream that the traitors, i.e., the Confederacy, lost, the better I feel.
I have no tolerance for traitors, especially those who look to overthrow constitutional democracy and replace it with some twisted theocratic tyranny--the very tyranny neo-Confederates accuse the President of being.
clydefrand
(4,325 posts)Well..... the Confederacy never rose in the first place, how can it do it 'again'?
hatrack
(59,587 posts)I rather enjoy the sound of it!
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Sounds like a fine reason for a day off, but I don't think we could even mandate MLK's birthday today.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 6, 2015, 03:15 PM - Edit history (1)
Ms. Yertle
(466 posts)to the spirit of Abraham Lincoln, who won the war. He wanted reconciliation and healing, and didn't want the south treated as conquered territory.