General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEscort Has Message For Wall Street Men: You Are Bad In Bed
"They want to talk a lot more than you think," says the author of the post, whose self-described physical attributes include having the kind of "tiny but curvy body that drives men wild" along with auburn hair and almond-shaped eyes.
"They want to vent about their kids' private schools, their bosses, their bonus talks, their friend beating them at squash," she continues. "They have big egos and are big babies. If I made any sign that they weren't the best lover ... they started asking all these questions and putting me down."
Next, the escort gets to what it is she'd really like to inform those former clients:
"No, actually, you're really small and you're bad in bed."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/02/escort-says-wall-street-men-bad-in-bed_n_1472459.html
trotsky
(49,533 posts)is a desire to put your partner's needs ahead of yours, and consider lovemaking a true success only if you've pleased THEM.
Is it a surprise the banksters can't put someone else's feelings ahead of their own?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)edcantor
(325 posts)Seriously, I know guys with guns, and I've seen them in the shower at the gym.
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)I shoot competitively and a lot of women shoot, too.
We don't tolerate sexist remarks about women, I would appreciate it if we didn't make them towards men, either.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)the size of their dick, then went to "i wonder if there has ever been a study". hm.... would be interesting to disprove no correlation.
i agree, it is a crappy thing to post. with no substance.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)the whole purpose is not putting any effort into being a "good lover". it is all about getting him off, hence the bucks.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)and the professionals that Marv Alpert and David Vitter were employing would seem to be less about 'getting off' and more about replacing their mother. Many wall streeters grew up with nannies and I think that shapes their view.
also, IMHO a slight majority of american men are duds in bed.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)barbtries
(28,811 posts)i can't help but wonder how many of these assholes are going oh shit! she's talking about me!
varelse
(4,062 posts)most of us have blinders on when it comes to our own flaws.
varelse
(4,062 posts)she clearly hates this one. I don't really blame her for that - I wouldn't do this even if I had the body for it.
I hope that most married men aren't like her customers
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The rest are a mixed bag, pretty much like humans in general.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)How about the ones that frequent men's rooms in airports?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Alcibiades
(5,061 posts)That she's no longer an escort.
varelse
(4,062 posts)I hope she enjoys the rest of her life and gets to do something she doesn't hate
lunatica
(53,410 posts)So I'd say both sides of the equation are equal. Both sides get what they want.
If both are willing then they should go for it. They're adults.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)of course, knowing Wall Street types, they probably think it's some other guy and not them...
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)seems par for the course.
Edweird
(8,570 posts)Last edited Fri May 4, 2012, 10:21 AM - Edit history (1)
It looks like the bankers aren't the only ones full of themselves in this.
"She says she tried out "sugar daddy" websites after she quit being an escort, thinking she might find someone looking for "something long term," but found them to be no better -- perhaps because some were still Wall Street types. "
Sounds to me like she and the bankers are more suited for each other than she is willing to acknowledge.
To quote Lord Edmund Blackadder: "If I wanted a lecture on the rights of man, I'd have gone to bed with Martin Luther".
treestar
(82,383 posts)guitar man
(15,996 posts)She needs to try out a poor guy to have a baseline comparison.
Alcibiades
(5,061 posts)To the folks who think she shouldn't have written this, why did you click on this one? Because it's interesting. I am certain most prostitutes have interesting stories, no matter where they work.
Secondly, the escort does not say that ALL the wall streeters she serviced had small penises and were bad in bed:
"Some, though, were animals in bed. It's like they have all this testosterone and power and it is somehow really hot with the right person. And some are really handsome and well-dressed. There have been a few where I've actually been jealous of their wives, even though they're there sleeping with me. It's a weird feeling. It's easier with the ugly or arrogant ones."
She was talking, rather specifically, about some of her suboptimal clients:
"But after a few months it became exhausting. They have big egos and are big babies. If I made any sign that they weren't the best lover, or that their dick wasn't the biggest dick I'd ever seen, they started asking all these questions and putting me down like: "Oh, well you've just seen more cock than a normal, nice girl would."
No, actually, you're really small and you're bad in bed."
But of course this repost leads with "Wall Street types have small penises and are bad in bed." It gets people to click on it. That being said, I do think that there is a selection effect: if you have a small penis and are bad in bed, your six or seven figure income does not really matter: you still wind up paying for it. And it's clear from the article that these men were seekiong not just sex, or a sexual manifestation of their economic power (though there's certainly that) but intimacy. That would probably incite some resentment, because what she wants is money, and intimacy is not for sale.