General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew CNN Poll: Voters want someone willing to undo Obama policies
I'll say it again: Never overestimate the American voter. Yeah, yeah. That's mean and elitist. Well, just look at election 2014.
If you could create the perfect candidate to succeed Barack Obama as president, what would their background be and what would they think?
A new CNN/ORC poll finds most Americans say they would like a candidate who's a seasoned political leader, someone with an executive background, and someone who's willing to change Barack Obama's policies.
Rather than assessing the traits of individual candidates, the poll asked respondents to think about their perfect candidate and choose between two statements relating to several different traits often found in presidential candidates.
<snip>
Three statements generated wide-reaching support. Fifty-nine percent of Americans say they'd like a candidate who has been in the public eye as a political leader for many years over one who's new to the political scene. Further, 59% say they prefer a candidate with executive experience over one who's worked as a legislator, and 57% say their perfect Obama successor would change most of the policies enacted by Obama's administration.
There's a link to the poll at the site below.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/22/politics/2016-election-poll-perfect-candidate/index.html
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)especially the whole executive beeswax, meant to favior GOP.
LakeVermilion
(1,044 posts)On the other hand, it might reflect the disdain that the Obama administration has had in regard to public education. They have thrown a lot of hard working educators under the bus.
MANative
(4,112 posts)identify or explain any of Obama's policies, with the single likely exception of the ACA. I'd bet that the questions were worded in the generic rather than specific to any actual Obama initiative, enacted or not. "Do you want someone to keep or change the policies of the Obama Administration?" would sound about right.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The candidate would change most of the policies of the Obama administration 57%
And this is why you get fairly useless results from such polls.
They don't specify the specific policies the person wants changed, or HOW they want them changed.
Are those polled against letting the poor have healthcare? We don't know.
Are those polled against using drone strikes all around the world? We don't know.
Are those polled against allowing gays in the military? We don't know.
Are those polled against keeping for-profit insurance companies in between you and your doctor? We don't know.
They could be 'against' most policies from the right or the left, and 'most' apparently means 'any policy I can think of while being polled'. And most people more easily remember things they're against than things they're for.
MANative
(4,112 posts)of people who will even think to question what the poll asked and what its results mean (absolutely nothing of worth) is horribly depressing.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Obamacare or universal healthcare.
calimary
(81,487 posts)that claim not to like the ACA. It will likely be interpreted as "thinks Obamacare sucks" BUT may just as likely be "don't like it because it didn't go far enough."
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)FOr example dissatisfaction with Obama's approach occurs on the right and left for quite different reasons, but when summed together don't reflect that difference...
Reducing polling into simple dialectic interpretation is even dumber than trying to have representative national leadership inside winner takes all system for the highest branch of government.
DamnYankeeInHouston
(1,365 posts)bigtree
(86,005 posts)...that's a rather misleading headline for such an ambiguous poll.
'would change most of Obama's policies' - not undo, or repeal, but 'change.' Btw, is it really a surprise to find that 94% of republicans want to see that 'change' of his policies - or that only 22% of Democrats polled want those changes?
Which policies would they change? Who the hell knows from this poll? I'll bet this isn't something that's especially unusual for a two-term lame-duck, but it's definitely the type of push-polling I'd expect from CNN, and not something which I'd give any serious consideration.
cali
(114,904 posts)hatrack
(59,592 posts)We'd better get right to work, huh?
onenote
(42,763 posts)The only surprise is that it wasn't 99.9 percent. And the 22 percent of Democrats who want change almost certainly don't want the same change as the repubs. In other words the poll results are basically worhless.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Freedumb!
global1
(25,270 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)If anything, President Obama didn't (or wasn't able to) go far enough? Remember all the "socialist" rhetoric the Republicans threw at him? I wish we'd seen a little more socialism.
Granted I'm not a big fan of the President's gun policies, but he never got them enacted anyway.
Obamacare? Should have been single-payer, universal healthcare in my opinion. Limbaugh wants to call that socialism? Fine with me. I think most people are starting to understand what nuts he and his ilk are anyway.
GeorgeGist
(25,323 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,713 posts)and I'm not a diehard supporter, but...
Hillary wins on at least two of those items.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)If other polls come in this way, and this one isn't an outlier, Hilary won't stand a chance. Honestly, I'm stunned by these statistics.
Wounded Bear
(58,713 posts)Jeb hasn't held office in years, and hasn't been much in the public eye during that time because of the name recognition.
Hillary has been kept in the public eye through the endless Benghazi investigations and other RW bullshit. They hate her and they've been giving her a lot of free publicity.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)As several other comments stated, few people could actually identify what the policies of Obama's administration have been.
Even the ACA would be a hard one to tease out since the actual experience of that has been largely controlled by the States.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)With this story, CNN has sent a message to Iran that the president's policies can be changed AND that a majority of the American people are looking for someone who WILL change president Obama's policies.
I think that undermines the president's Iran negotiations even more than just suggesting that the president's Executive agreements can be changed by the next president, so if there was even a question that the idiotic letter the Republicans wrote was a violation of the Logan Act, this story should be a slam dunk.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)I wasn't one of the people arguing that the republican's letter, scummy and inappropriate as it was, amounted to any sort of actionable treason or sedition, but for those people who did argue that, doesn't it weaken president Obama's bargaining position even more to say that not only CAN the next administration undo executive actions from the Obama Administration but also that a majority of the American public (at the moment, if this poll is believed) are looking for a president who WILL do that?
Pisces
(5,602 posts)he gets.
demwing
(16,916 posts)of allowing a black man to live in the White House?
samsingh
(17,601 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,380 posts)Fuck that.
PM Martin
(2,660 posts)Is that what most Americans want?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)March 13-15, 2015. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage points.
This sample includes 605 interviews among landline respondents and 404 interviews among cell phone respondents.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/03/22/2016.wish.list.pdf
51% wants a candidate that agrees with them on all major issues.
57% want to undo all of Obama's policies.
Sounds to me like their sample was a bit skewed toads the right.