Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,677 posts)
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 08:19 PM Mar 2015

New Generation Takes Over for the Clintons

New Generation Takes Over for the Clintons

by Taegan Goddard at the Political Wire

http://politicalwire.com/2015/03/15/new-generation-takes-over-for-the-clintons/

"SNIP.................


The New York Times profiles Robby Mook, who was just 12 when Bill Clinton was elected president but will now be managing Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

“Over more than two decades in national politics, the Clintons have amassed an army of well-meaning defenders who will bring to 2016 old battle wounds and axes to grind that date back to the White House and Arkansas — perhaps not the ideal message in a presumptive campaign that seeks to reintroduce the 67-year-old Mrs. Clinton as a fresh, forward-looking candidate.”

“It falls largely on Mr. Mook, and the band of young operatives he has assembled (called the Mook Mafia), to move the grievance-laden Clinton machine into the modern political age. The success of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign will rest in part on whether this younger generation of earnest, data- and social-media-savvy operatives can prevail.”



...............SNIP"
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Generation Takes Over for the Clintons (Original Post) applegrove Mar 2015 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Mar 2015 #1
If my math is correct these sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #2
quick how old is Jeb Bush or Mitt Romney dsc Mar 2015 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Mar 2015 #4
again neither Bush nor Romney started in politics last week either dsc Mar 2015 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Mar 2015 #7
I am pretty damn sure that Bush is reaching out to all voters dsc Mar 2015 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Mar 2015 #9
You are quite right, but don't sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #5

Response to applegrove (Original post)

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
2. If my math is correct these
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 08:33 PM
Mar 2015

are people in their thirties now. Well, good luck to them
to convince the 20 year olds to go out and vote.

Still, I will wait for the message, which will be more important
than the person.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
3. quick how old is Jeb Bush or Mitt Romney
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 10:10 PM
Mar 2015

I bet articles about them don't include their ages. Romney is close to Clinton's age and Bush is probably less than 5 years younger than she is.

Response to dsc (Reply #3)

dsc

(52,162 posts)
6. again neither Bush nor Romney started in politics last week either
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 10:22 PM
Mar 2015

but I bet I couldn't find an article on them that mentioned their age if I tried to find one.

Response to dsc (Reply #6)

Response to dsc (Reply #8)

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
5. You are quite right, but don't
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 10:19 PM
Mar 2015

get the gender problem correctly. A man, let's say Reagan,
seems to have no problem with age, IF,IF the Party is with
him. An older woman has a far more serious problem, even
with party approval.

I still want Bernie to run, but since the party does not
want him to run, his age is becoming a problem.

Let me state it differently: If the repugs felt they would need
him, they would run Kissinger, no questions asked. His problem
is that he is not a born citizen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Generation Takes Over...