Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 11:09 AM Mar 2015

“Idiocy”: New York Times editorial board scorches GOP’s nuclear sabotage

Gray Lady goes after 47 Senate Republicans in unusually blistering language

LUKE BRINKER


In keeping with the generally staid disposition of the Gray Lady, one might have expected the New York Times editorial board to chide the Republican senators seeking to torpedo the Iran nuclear talks as “misguided,” “wrongheaded,” “imprudent,” or some such. But instead, the Times on Thursday published a scathing editorial condemning the GOP’s diplomatic sabotage in unusually blistering language: The GOP’s stunts, the headline announces, reflect nothing less than “Republican Idiocy on Iran.”

Denouncing Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-AR) “disgraceful and irresponsible” letter to the Iranian leadership — signed by 46 other GOP senators — the Times’ editors contend that by warning Iran’s leaders that a future president could nix a nuclear deal, Republicans engaged in “a blatant, dangerous effort to undercut the president on a grave national security issue by communicating directly with a foreign government.”

“Besides being willing to sabotage any deal with Iran (before they know the final details), these Republicans are perfectly willing to diminish America’s standing as a global power capable of crafting international commitments and adhering to them,” the editors write, echoing the criticism put forth by Vice President Joe Biden, who issued a statement this week arguing that the letter conveys “a highly misleading signal to friend and foe alike that that our Commander-in-Chief cannot deliver on America’s commitments — a message that is as false as it is dangerous.”

Although many Cotton detractors seized on the Iranian foreign minister’s swift dismissal of the communiqué, the Times notes that it could nevertheless “embolden hard-liners in Iran” who seek confrontation, not conciliation.

“In rejecting diplomacy, the Republicans make an Iranian bomb and military conflict more likely,” the Times concludes. For many, that may be precisely the point.

###

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/12/idiocy_new_york_times_editorial_board_scorches_gops_nuclear_sabotage/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Idiocy”: New York Times editorial board scorches GOP’s nuclear sabotage (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2015 OP
Republicans, if anything Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2015 #1
"the Republicans make an Iranian bomb and military conflict more likely” IDemo Mar 2015 #2
Exactly, and it's time for the NYT and other newspapers to spell out that point in their Nay Mar 2015 #4
Eeyup. nt hifiguy Mar 2015 #5
Just wanted to throw this in for good measure - calimary Mar 2015 #3
In all seriousness, Cotton looks like the kind of hifiguy Mar 2015 #6
EEEEUUUUWWWWW!!! Now that you mention it... calimary Mar 2015 #8
They will wear the criticism like a badge of honor QED Mar 2015 #7

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,422 posts)
1. Republicans, if anything
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 11:19 AM
Mar 2015

Are showing how much they intend to (not) respect/honor agreements and how they should not be trusted to be in the WH (or any elected position, really).

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
2. "the Republicans make an Iranian bomb and military conflict more likely”
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 11:34 AM
Mar 2015

That would be Mission Accomplished from their point of view.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
4. Exactly, and it's time for the NYT and other newspapers to spell out that point in their
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 03:01 PM
Mar 2015

editorials, rather than leave it unsaid.

calimary

(81,367 posts)
3. Just wanted to throw this in for good measure -
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 02:31 PM
Mar 2015

from one of the NYTimes' direct competitors - which NAILED it earlier this week:

[img][/img]

I've said it before but I love rubbing it in: I just LOVE LOVE LOVE seeing rand paul's photo on there. I hope the Dems use this as a campaign tool - for THAT tool in particular! He with the Brillo pad on his head who fancies himself as the next President. Yeah, rand paul. That means YOU, TOO. TRAITOR!!!

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
6. In all seriousness, Cotton looks like the kind of
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 03:49 PM
Mar 2015

skeevy weirdo/perv who hangs out at the bus station trolling for runaways.

QED

(2,747 posts)
7. They will wear the criticism like a badge of honor
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 03:53 PM
Mar 2015

Cotton is delusional and the GOP lemmings are following him over a cliff of crazy because hey, "ain't nobody gonna out crazy us!"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»“Idiocy”: New York Times ...