Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The FCC has released the net neutrality order (Original Post) onenote Mar 2015 OP
here's part of it steve2470 Mar 2015 #1
Quick scan through looks fairly comprehensive to my non expert eye. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #6
I think this is the order steve2470 Mar 2015 #2
Wow! That's as clear as mud. nt elias49 Mar 2015 #3
Um, yeah actually it is :) snooper2 Mar 2015 #4
I got lost in the other 582 pages. elias49 Mar 2015 #5
Yes. Regulations need to be detailed when dealing geek tragedy Mar 2015 #8
Sure, but they then cease to be clear and simple. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2015 #11
There is actually only 8 pages of regulations (Appendix A) Trekologer Mar 2015 #9
This actually sounds.... sendero Mar 2015 #10
So much for the idiotic conspiracies. joshcryer Mar 2015 #7
So what about all the GOP talking heads who said Takket Mar 2015 #12

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
6. Quick scan through looks fairly comprehensive to my non expert eye.
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 10:37 AM
Mar 2015

Thanks Obama...like for real and to the millions who supplied some heat to the kitchen it sounds like the FCC was impacted by it.

Kudos to Wheeler for taking this seriously and going against his industry as well.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
4. Um, yeah actually it is :)
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 10:15 AM
Mar 2015

1. Clear, Bright-Line Rules
14. Because the record overwhelmingly supports adopting rules and demonstrates that three
specific practices invariably harm the open Internet—Blocking, Throttling, and Paid Prioritization—this
Order bans each of them, applying the same rules to both fixed and mobile broadband Internet access
service.


No Blocking. Consumers who subscribe to a retail broadband Internet access service
must get what they have paid for—access to all (lawful) destinations on the Internet. This essential and
well-accepted principle has long been a tenet of Commission policy, stretching back to its landmark
decision in Carterfone, which protected a customer’s right to connect a telephone to the monopoly
telephone network.
Thus, this Order adopts a straightforward ban:
A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such
person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or nonharmful
devices, subject to reasonable network management.



No Throttling. The 2010 open Internet rule against blocking contained an ancillary
prohibition against the degradation of lawful content, applications, services, and devices, on the ground
that such degradation would be tantamount to blocking. This Order creates a separate rule to guard
against degradation targeted at specific uses of a customer’s broadband connection:
A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is
so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content,
application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network
management.

The ban on throttling is necessary both to fulfill the reasonable expectations of a
customer who signs up for a broadband service that promises access to all of the lawful Internet, and to
avoid gamesmanship designed to avoid the no-blocking rule by, for example, rendering an application
effectively, but not technically, unusable. It prohibits the degrading of Internet traffic based on source,
destination, or content.17 It also specifically prohibits conduct that singles out content competing with a
broadband provider’s business model.



No Paid Prioritization. Paid prioritization occurs when a broadband provider accepts
payment (monetary or otherwise) to manage its network in a way that benefits particular content,
applications, services, or devices. To protect against “fast lanes,” this Order adopts a rule that establishes
that:
A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such
person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. Yes. Regulations need to be detailed when dealing
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 09:12 AM
Mar 2015

with matters as complicated and pervasive as telecommunications.

Unless you would prefer Reagan-style deregulation.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
11. Sure, but they then cease to be clear and simple.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:34 AM
Mar 2015

The whole reason that "lawyer" exists as a profession is that it is not possible for a system of laws to be simultaneously just and comprehensible to the layperson, and obviously the former is the correct side to err on.

Trekologer

(997 posts)
9. There is actually only 8 pages of regulations (Appendix A)
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 09:29 AM
Mar 2015

The rest is background on the issues and the FCC's justification, plus 40 (!!!) pages of objections by the two Republican commissioners.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
10. This actually sounds....
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 09:36 AM
Mar 2015

.... pretty good. There was certainly a lot of angst on both sides. This looks like net neutrality to me, whatever else that might be in the order notwithstanding.

Takket

(21,592 posts)
12. So what about all the GOP talking heads who said
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:42 AM
Mar 2015

The government was going to control the internet and regulate what content we can see? Anything like that in there?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The FCC has released the ...