General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumschillfactor
(7,578 posts)thank you for posting!
cwydro
(51,308 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Gothmog
(145,427 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)They'd be better if they didn't continue the misconception that these are bilateral talks between the US and Iran. There are five or six other countries involved, as well. Which makes what the republicans did even more appalling and seditious.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)Martin Eden
(12,873 posts)Pretty much nails it.
FSogol
(45,504 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)And so timely, too!
Tom_Foolery
(4,691 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,274 posts)... a lot of people in the South use this as a term of denigration, without giving any thought to where it came from. I've tried to convince my relatives not to use it, but for some it's a deeply ingrained (if unconscious) habit.
FSogol
(45,504 posts)From Elyse Bruce, a writer who analyzes idioms:
Idiomation is providing the history of the phrase here along with newspaper articles to illustrate the phrase for those who are wondering how the phrase came about and whether it is a racist slur.
Back on November 17, 2009 on the NBA website, the following was part of the article published to The Optimist page:
I know this is a basketball column, and Ill get to the Cavaliers fifth straight win in just a cotton-pickin minute. But these anemic performances by the Browns cannot stand! Not if were going to win the Lombardi Trophy before stuff starts blowing up. Im so old, I remember when the Browns used to score touchdowns. Several of them IN A SINGLE GAME!
Many more example and the whole essay here: https://idiomation.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/cotton-pickin-minute/
She concludes that "Cotton pickin minute is not a racial slur but calling someone a cotton picker could be considered an insult."
eppur_se_muova
(36,274 posts)so yes, it was intended to be hateful. Best to avoid it, even if you don't "get" it.
FSogol
(45,504 posts)is not "cottin pickin' hands."
mountain grammy
(26,638 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
--US Constitution, Article 3, Section 3
No, I don't think Senator Cotton and 46 other Republicans committed treason. But it comes pretty damn close.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)Petition - We the people.. - PASS THIS ON! SPREAD IT AROUND! - Over 224k signers in TWO DAYS!
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/file-charges-against-47-us-senators-violation-logan-act-attempting-undermine-nuclear-agreement/NKQnpJS9
we petition the obama administration to:
File charges against the 47 U.S. Senators in violation of The Logan Act in attempting to undermine a nuclear agreement.
On March 9th, 2015, forty-seven United States Senators committed a treasonous offense when they decided to violate the Logan Act, a 1799 law which forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments. Violation of the Logan Act is a felony, punishable under federal law with imprisonment of up to three years.
At a time when the United States government is attempting to reach a potential nuclear agreement with the Iranian government, 47 Senators saw fit to instead issue a condescending letter to the Iranian government stating that any agreement brokered by our President would not be upheld once the president leaves office.
This is a clear violation of federal law. In attempting to undermine our own nation, these 47 senators have committed treason.
Published Date: Mar 09, 2015
nt
Hekate
(90,751 posts)Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,583 posts)Love me some Toons!