Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,438 posts)
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 06:19 AM Mar 2015

New York Times Editorial: Republican Idiocy on Iran

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/12/opinion/republican-idiocy-on-iran.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region®ion=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=0

After helping to ignite a firestorm over a possible nuclear agreement with Iran, Senator John McCain, a former Republican presidential candidate, is now sort of acknowledging his error. “Maybe that wasn’t exactly the best way to do that,” he said on Fox News on Tuesday.

He was referring to the disgraceful and irresponsible letter that he and 46 Senate colleagues sent to Iran’s leaders this week that generated outrage from Democrats and even some conservatives.

The letter was an attempt to scare the Iranians from making a deal that would limit their nuclear program for at least a decade by issuing a warning that the next president could simply reverse any agreement. It was a blatant, dangerous effort to undercut the president on a grave national security issue by communicating directly with a foreign government.


Maybe Mr. McCain, who is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, should have thought about the consequences before he signed the letter, which was drafted by Tom Cotton, a Republican of Arkansas, a junior senator with no foreign policy credentials. Instead of trying to be leaders and statesmen, the Republicans in Congress seem to think their role is outside the American government, divorced from constitutional principles, tradition and the security interests of the American people.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York Times Editorial: Republican Idiocy on Iran (Original Post) Stuart G Mar 2015 OP
"Besides being willing to sabotage any deal with Iran (before they know the final details), these pampango Mar 2015 #1
Nixon sabotaged LBJ's peace negotiations, Regan sabotaged JC hostage negotiations to win presidency stuffmatters Mar 2015 #34
And now we know what happens when... gregcrawford Mar 2015 #2
K&R!!! Cha Mar 2015 #3
Why? Scarsdale Mar 2015 #4
A clear and present danger Augiedog Mar 2015 #5
When do WE THE PEOPLE take a stand asiliveandbreathe Mar 2015 #6
"Mccain - sir, your time has come and gone..." excellent idea. Stuart G Mar 2015 #8
Indeed. Just more validation for our votes for President/Commander-in-Chief in 2008. calimary Mar 2015 #19
Well I remember one about cowboys. zeemike Mar 2015 #9
Good point. I remember that one, too. calimary Mar 2015 #20
great editorial Gothmog Mar 2015 #7
Does a politician, or anyone else, have to be convicted of treason to be called a traitor? world wide wally Mar 2015 #10
I don't think so..That these assholes would try to undermine negotiations Stuart G Mar 2015 #11
Here is the answer on that from Senator Mark Kirk...Illinois..why he signed..Traitor?. Stuart G Mar 2015 #13
Clever blurb, but what are the "facts"? world wide wally Mar 2015 #14
Has anyone ever seen.... Takket Mar 2015 #12
Really? That's the only one I don't recall well, I'll have to review it now. nightscanner59 Mar 2015 #28
well, spoiler alert inside........ Takket Mar 2015 #31
They didn't even bring Iraq to it's knees. brush Mar 2015 #33
Great editorial... Spazito Mar 2015 #15
surprised that mccain has become a traitor samsingh Mar 2015 #16
this is all because Pandora opened that box Voice for Peace Mar 2015 #17
And they will get away with it..... Marrah_G Mar 2015 #18
“Maybe that wasn’t exactly the best way to do that" napkinz Mar 2015 #21
glad to see the times doing something correct, for a change. niyad Mar 2015 #22
McCain IS a low-life scum …and i still have no regrets calling him that. Agony Mar 2015 #23
This: Republicans think they're outside the government. n/t Beartracks Mar 2015 #24
Yes! After giving Bibi a blowjob in public... HoosierCowboy Mar 2015 #25
And when their terms are up ... chemenger Mar 2015 #26
Hmm, dunno. The nursing homes are filling up as quickly as they empty beds. Fox is losing nightscanner59 Mar 2015 #29
Great editorial Gothmog Mar 2015 #27
I signed the prosecute-petition! I'm sick of this thumbing their nose nightscanner59 Mar 2015 #30
Wow, they got way more than the needed 100K sigs! Helen Borg Mar 2015 #36
NYT editorials and general news are widely read in Israel.....Bibi whining is all about the American reaction. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #32
McCain, also guilty of treason. Helen Borg Mar 2015 #35
There isn't a day that goes by that I don't feel grateful that Skidmore Mar 2015 #37

pampango

(24,692 posts)
1. "Besides being willing to sabotage any deal with Iran (before they know the final details), these
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 07:44 AM
Mar 2015
Republicans are perfectly willing to diminish America’s standing as a global power capable of crafting international commitments and adhering to them.

But perhaps President Obama described this bizarre reality best. “It’s somewhat ironic to see some members of Congress wanting to make common cause with the hard-liners in Iran,” he said. “It’s an unusual coalition.”

So far, the Iranians have largely dismissed the bumbling threat, with their foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, describing the letter as “propaganda.” But there are fears it could embolden hard-liners in Iran who, like the Republicans and some of the Democrats in Congress, oppose any nuclear agreement between Iran, the United States and its major allies.

The best and only practical way to restrain Iran from developing a bomb is through negotiating a strict agreement with tough monitoring. In rejecting diplomacy, the Republicans make an Iranian bomb and military conflict more likely.

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
34. Nixon sabotaged LBJ's peace negotiations, Regan sabotaged JC hostage negotiations to win presidency
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 07:13 PM
Mar 2015

Until the NYT connects these dots, i.e. does it's job of reporting the facts of the history of Repubs sedition of exactly this kind, it is
still giving a wink wink to the Repubs....propaganda by omission. This shouldn't be a "public scolding" by the NYT. Their obligation is to tell the whole history and truth of Republicans deadly interferences in destroying sensitive presidential negotiations for their own political gain.

Nixon and Regan both escaped punishment because both parties & the MSM kept their political poison quiet i.e. essentially let these crimes against Americans evolve into RW legend (as the ultimate "dirty tricks&quot . Even Tehran Tom/the Tehran 47's threat in the letter re: dealing with the "next" ...supposedly Repub administration ...is precisely out of the Nixon/Regan playbook

This letter and act of Repub direct defiance, of usurping and threatening our national negotiations and interest did not occur in a political or historical vacuum nor share any similarities with Jane Fonda or Nancy Pelosi (the Msm sanctioned false equivalencies from the RW) These 47 senators defined themselves as Republicans and the next leaders of the USA just as NIxon and Regan did.

I guess the only slightly surprising thing is that the 47 wrote this letter publicly, whereas Nixon/Kissinger and Regan did their mutinous
"diplomacy" in secret. That actually says something about how openly unabashed the Repubs have become in the last 50 years with their own repugnant, antidemocracy politics

The well recocognized expert on Nixon/ Regan/ recent Repub history of sedition is Robert Parry. Why is he not invited on any MSM show giving essential historical perspective for the Tehran ,and why no consultation of Parry by the NYT or any newspaper?

I hope, at least, Chris Hayes, Rachel Maddow. Bill Maher( tho hardly the MSM) book Robert Parry...set an accurate historical framework for the Tehran 47.




gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
2. And now we know what happens when...
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 07:44 AM
Mar 2015

... malicious mental defectives elect a pack of rabid hyenas to high office. Nothing good.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
4. Why?
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 08:18 AM
Mar 2015

The leaders in Iran recognize the letter as a sign of the disruptive republican obstructionism, why is the media in this country ignoring it? From day one of the first inauguration, the gop has done NOTHING for the citizens of this country, they have blocked everything President Obama has tried to do. Sometimes he has been able to roll over them, but they keep on going. Where are the jobs they promised, unless they were all military jobs? This wet-behind the ears Cotton shows up, and he is their pin up boy, leading the pack. McCain put his decision making skills on full display when he ran with Palin as his VP. He should have retired (in disgrace) after that debacle. He will NEVER recognize that the BETTER man won the election, and we should all be thankful for that.

Augiedog

(2,548 posts)
5. A clear and present danger
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 08:39 AM
Mar 2015

The Republican Party has become a clear and present danger to America, democracy and rational thinking. Good thing the Iranian leadership is smarter than these republican Morons otherwise we might all be painted with the brush of world wide derision and scorn. If these republicans are allowed to get away with this what will be their next act, and who will pay the price for it? Teheran Tom Cotton is totally unrepentant for his leadership role in this treasonous fiasco. Benedict Arnold only sold out West Point, Teheran Tom and 46 other alleged American senators sold out America and its Commander in Chief. The day after Teheran Tom sent the open letter to Iran he met with numerous big name defense contractors in off the record meetings. Why? What was he promising to these war profiteers. It appears that if the republican party gets anymore control of the U.S. Government they fully intend to sent the world on fire, possibly nuclear fire. The new Republican Party, a clear and present danger to America and the world.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
6. When do WE THE PEOPLE take a stand
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 08:39 AM
Mar 2015

against the chicken hawks? -

Brings to mind a song "Momma, don't let your baby's grow up to be soldiers"

Where are the Peacemakers.....

Mccain - sir, your time has come and gone...

Stuart G

(38,438 posts)
8. "Mccain - sir, your time has come and gone..." excellent idea.
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 09:30 AM
Mar 2015

Strange ....Mccain seems to be the only one who signed the letter that will admit this was a mistake
...Will others follow? and admit this ?
Will this cost some of these idiots the next election?
Will the main stream media continue to follow this story that shows what true "idiots" these people are?
..???????????????????????????????????

calimary

(81,383 posts)
19. Indeed. Just more validation for our votes for President/Commander-in-Chief in 2008.
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 01:52 PM
Mar 2015

Ran off and did something utterly ill-considered and thoroughly jerky before even bothering his little brain about consequences of such actions. Yeah, we sure did need a Commander-in-Chief like THAT, didn't we, STILL-SENATOR mccain? Sure glad the voters weren't fooled.

Sadly, this is proof-positive that just having been in the military in one's past does NOT entitle one to a free ride to a bigger job in politics. It certainly helps. But it's not everything. And it does NOT guarantee that individuals with that past experience have learned anything from it. TRAITOR tom, too. You'd think, having been suited up in the Middle East, he wouldn't have an appetite to provoke much more of that.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
9. Well I remember one about cowboys.
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 09:35 AM
Mar 2015

But that metaphor works too, because cowboys were a lawless bunch that would shoot up the town and had contempt for the law.
And I hope their time has come and gone, but I doubt it.

And welcome to DU.

calimary

(81,383 posts)
20. Good point. I remember that one, too.
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 01:53 PM
Mar 2015

"Mama don't let your babies grow up to be cowboys" - or something like that.

Stuart G

(38,438 posts)
11. I don't think so..That these assholes would try to undermine negotiations
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 11:28 AM
Mar 2015

....basically to return our relations with Iran back to normal..that is what this is really about..that would give Obama two ...

Cuba
Iran..

The republicans do not want that..do they?

Stuart G

(38,438 posts)
13. Here is the answer on that from Senator Mark Kirk...Illinois..why he signed..Traitor?.
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 11:32 AM
Mar 2015

WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) today issued the following statement on the role of Congress amid American-led negotiations to constrain Iran’s nuclear program:

“In exchange for allowing Iran to maintain the capabilities to build nuclear weapons, the Administration promises to “comprehensively lift” as many as 14 Iran sanctions laws, many of which passed with bipartisan veto-proof majorities. There is no Constitutional authority granting a president unilateral power to repeal American law. Sanctions should not be weakened until Iran stops its nuclear weapons program, stops supporting and exporting terrorism, stops aggression against its neighbors, stops egregious human rights abuses, and stops threatening to annihilate Israel. A better deal, with bipartisan congressional backing, is the best insurance policy against a nuclear Iran, a destructive arms race, and war in the Middle East.”

Takket

(21,600 posts)
12. Has anyone ever seen....
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 11:31 AM
Mar 2015

Star Trek vi: the undiscovered country? It is bizarre how similar this fiasco is to that movie.

Takket

(21,600 posts)
31. well, spoiler alert inside........
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 04:23 PM
Mar 2015

long story short, a disaster in the Klingon Empire means they can no longer afford hostilities with the Federation or they will eventually die. The Federation extends an olive branch and agrees to meet with their Chancellor to discuss peace. "Hard line" Klingons do not trust the Federation and oppose the Chancellor's move, and the same hostility exists in the Federation.

The irony of the film is that the most hate filled Klingons actually conspire WITH the most hate filled members of the Federation to assassinate the Chancellor to sabotage the peace process.

And here we are in 2015 where the 47 traitors are doing the same thing, working hand in hand with "hard line" Iranian haters of the west to sabotage Obama in an attempt to maintain perpetual hatred between the two nations. In the long view I see this as a delaying tactic by the GOP until the next GOP president can take power, execute whatever war pretext they will use, and commence the destruction of Iran (you thought Iraq made Halliburton rich? Wait till you see how much money we will have to pay them to bring the much more formidable Iran to its knees).

brush

(53,801 posts)
33. They didn't even bring Iraq to it's knees.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 08:59 AM
Mar 2015

They did create ISIS though.

All good results.

The warmonger/war profiteers want what they want and Obama is in the way.

Spazito

(50,404 posts)
15. Great editorial...
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 12:29 PM
Mar 2015

I am glad to see McCain being called out on this, other articles/editorials seemed to ignore his part and only focus on the 2016 potential repub candidates that signed.

Along with his "“Maybe that wasn’t exactly the best way to do that,” he also stated he thought the letter was "reasonable".

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
21. “Maybe that wasn’t exactly the best way to do that"
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 02:13 PM
Mar 2015

that's the problem with Republicans ... they act first, think about it later

are you listening, Rudy?


niyad

(113,490 posts)
22. glad to see the times doing something correct, for a change.
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 10:06 PM
Mar 2015

of course, if that paper had been doing its job this century, maybe we wouldn't be in this mess--sitting on stories of corruption, spewing reichwing propoganda as news, etc., etc. judith miller?

HoosierCowboy

(561 posts)
25. Yes! After giving Bibi a blowjob in public...
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 09:11 AM
Mar 2015

...the followup rim job was probably not in the national interest. These incidents will permanently change our relationship with Israel, and not in Israels favor.
Nice job GOP...

chemenger

(1,593 posts)
26. And when their terms are up ...
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 09:53 AM
Mar 2015

the idiots who voted these 47 assholes in will undoubtedly vote them in again ... ... ...


So who is really to blame here

nightscanner59

(802 posts)
29. Hmm, dunno. The nursing homes are filling up as quickly as they empty beds. Fox is losing
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 02:48 PM
Mar 2015

80 percent of it's viewership by the droves. More than they can likely gerrymander their way around by 2016.
It's just the dang midterm voter turnout slump of the midterms they have chance like this last debacle.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
32. NYT editorials and general news are widely read in Israel.....Bibi whining is all about the American reaction.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 12:34 PM
Mar 2015

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
37. There isn't a day that goes by that I don't feel grateful that
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 07:41 PM
Mar 2015

the duo of McCain-Palin were handily beaten.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York Times Editorial:...