General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI wonder who Bernie & Liz will vote for if Hillary is Democratic Nominee for President
Any ideas?
Scott Walker?
Jeb Bush?
Hillary Clinton?
we can do it
(12,185 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)He would be the only Republican I'd ever vote for.
Jacob Koppel "Jake" Javits (May 18, 1904 March 7, 1986) was a Republican Party politician who served as a United States Senator from New York from 1957 to 1981. He was one of the most liberal of liberal Republicans serving in Congress in the 20th Century.[1] He was originally allied with Governor Nelson Rockefeller, and fellow Senators Irving Ives and Kenneth Keating. He voted with Democrats more often than with Republicans. He was regarded as the most far to the left of all Republicans in the Senate. No Republican in the Senate ever had a lower rating from the American Conservative Union. His highest rating was 11% in 1983, his lowest were 5 years of 0.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve with this post.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)OP is trying to suggest that folks who support either Bernie or Warren should support HRC if she's the nominee simply because they would probably vote for HRC. It's simply another 'Y'all need to vote for Hillary' posting.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)despite the/any differences they might have with her on some issues is divisive?
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...and vote for Republicans is extremely divisive.
I was here in 2004 and 2008. I remember the divisiveness well.
Autumn
(45,094 posts)at least that's what DF said on meet the press.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Since he's a Democratic Socialist. Last time around that was Stewart Alexander. Dunno if they'll run him again this next time yet.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)The corporate MO: Try to get people fighting over the shiny horse race while avoiding at all costs discussion of the actual policy positions held by the candidates.
There are six or eight OP's like this every day, repeating the Third Way talking points. This is now what passes for political discourse in a pseudo-democracy with a well-funded propaganda machine.
djean111
(14,255 posts)And I don't really care, none of my business. Invasive, kind of. Not to mention unverifiable.
Oh, is this a you should vote for Hillary thing?
dissentient
(861 posts)want to vote for someone.
It is the sheeple who need someone to tell them how and who they should vote for, IMHO.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)'cause, you know, IWR.
Sid
think
(11,641 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Assuming, of course, that she is the nominee. Anyone who expects otherwise is not paying attention.